this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
177 points (94.5% liked)

Political Memes

1844 readers
276 users here now

Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] monogram@feddit.nl 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Can I choose to be mad about all of them?

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Consistency is good, provided the reason for being mad is valid.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 37 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The bald Monk lady wasn’t particularly popular as a casting choice IIRC and this implies that Romani people can’t have a pale complexion which isn’t true at all.

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I don't know this one but it looks like the bald monk lady was supposed to be Tibetan, not Romani? She's definitely not Tibetan.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I mentioned two separate characters in my comment, the Tibetan monk first, and the second being the Romani character. I’m not sure how that was unclear.

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It was unclear because you switched topic mid sentence without even using a comma. We ain't mind readers.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 1 points 4 hours ago

While that would have made it more explicit yes, it wasn't that hard to figure out they were talking about two different characters when you understand that the bald monk wasn't labelled romani

[–] reev@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 hours ago

I think the "this" in "this implies" can read as referring to the casting choice for the tibetan monk, not to the meme itself.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 17 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

She's a recast of an Orientalist character because they decided that was less problematic than the Orientalism

But they still did the rest of the Orientalism and Wong was the best part of the movie so...

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They made her Celtic...

Not that any of that matters. She was ok on the movie, so very few people complained and no studio amplified the race-rage to cover up for the people complaining that the movie sucks.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

A Celt with a shaved head wearing Asian robes, living in a Tibetan monastery that Dr. Strange reaches after backpacking through Asia looking for spiritual enlightenment lol

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

They can teleport anywhere in the word at will. If anything, they should have been more diverse.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Sure. Doesn't stop it from being blatant Orientalism on screen while not even bothering to cast an Asian person for the role.

At least give her a knot tattoo or something, damn, that's just some bald white lady that you made vague and irrelevant Druidic implications about otherwise.

It'd have been really cool if they had each sorcerer using distinct styles based on different traditional mysticisms but maybe that's a bit much to expect of Disney.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Somehow, it's more normal than everybody in a group that recruits people from all over the world for tens of thousands of years having the same ethnicity...

But I understand if you are complaining it's different from the comics. As I said, it doesn't matter.

No, I'm saying what they did was still blatant Orientalism they just wouldn't even let an Asian actor have the leading part.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 34 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I saw something that it only works if the character was in a book that hasn't had a movie adaptation yet. In the Shawshank Redemption, "Red" was originally a white irishman. But because bigots don't read books, it didn't upset anyone when Morgan Freeman played him.

[–] RaoulDuke@piefed.blahaj.zone 24 points 16 hours ago

I love that they throw in the “because I’m Irish” in the movie.

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

In case anyone else was wondering...

  1. Tonto
  2. Ra's al Ghul
  3. The Ancient One
  4. Scarlet Witch
  5. The Little Mermaid
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, has anyone considered that people simply weren't familiar with the source material for the rest of these?

[–] Upperhand@lemmy.world 21 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Uhh, off the top of my head, Nick Fury was white, but Jackson was awesome, and no one wants anyone else to have that role. kingpins is white but Michael Clarke Duncan fucking rocked that shit. Heimdell was Idris Elba, and he was awesome in that part. Zendaya, as mj was the best mj so far. I'm sure there's more, so maybe stop rage baiting...

[–] protist@mander.xyz 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't the point of this meme to mock the people who are enraged?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 14 hours ago

Some kind of selective rage even

[–] Delusions@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 15 hours ago

Actually Nick fury was black in ultimate universe before the movies and drawn to look like Sam Jackson on purpose

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Rage bait is the life blood of social media.... I should go read a book

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 11 points 16 hours ago

Role. Actor.

Role. Actor.

Role. Actor.

Role. Actor.

Role. Actor.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago

It really do be like that.

A lot. No seriously like an alarming amount of "a lot"

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

As I said before:

They hate live action Ariel because she's "ugly."

And that is so much worse. Especially when people see nothing wrong with that statement.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine being so vain that you get angry that a movie role is played by someone that you think is ugly.

How pathetic.

I'm not sure if that's worse than being a racist piece of shit about it, but it can't be far behind.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Well that's just it; it's tied up in racism. They're calling Ariel ugly because she's an African American woman.

I mean... I'm fine with people complaining about actors not fitting roles, but that's not the case here.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Oh. Was my comment too subtle?

I'll clarify: if anyone actually thinks that an actor playing a role is ugly, and gets mad about it, that's pathetic. But we all know why their calling her "ugly" don't we?

And if that's not blatant enough: they're calling her ugly because she's black, not because she's unattractive. And I don't mean to imply she's unattractive by this, just that her attractiveness isn't the actual problem.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It's especially ridiculous because:

  • A: Halle Bailey's painfully gorgeous

  • B: She's got this... How do I describe it? 'Mythologic' look? Like she's how I'd picture a siren out of The Odyssey or something like that.

Again, I'm all for actors matching their characters, and soulless 'diversity' casting just for the veneer of inclusivity can be less than ideal, but that's not close to the case here. The rage around Ariel was just totally absurd (and absolutely racist).

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

Imagine getting mad because a black girl played a mermaid in a Disney movie.