Great, another coward judge.
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
257 points (100.0% liked)
politics
25783 readers
2736 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The land of no consequences.
Do the courts not see how continuing to declare this man guilty but impose no consequences is begging for vigilante violence? Perhaps once the violence is directed at the courts they'll care.
The whole idea is the erosion of institutions. Oligarchs need the government to be ineffectual, hypocritical, and incompetent. Destroying public service and replacing with private markets is one of the few areas of extraction left.
An ineffectual, hypocritical, and incompetent government makes the unregulated company town run and the factories with slave labor seem better in comparison. They're still worse, but that'll change with enough anti-government in the government.
Trump broke the law and nothing happened? A tale as old as time...
"Nothing we can do, it's the other branch of government's problem"
True as it can be
Barely even friends
Then somebody bends
Unexpectedly
How many fucking instances are there of this convicted felon doing X, but paying NO CONSEQUENCES whatsoever?
He has the ultimate get out of jail free card
Why even bother hearing the case if you're not going to do anything about it regardless of the outcome? To waste everyone's time?
Well, they can probably get the one month pay they lost out on. They just can't get their jobs back.
That being said, I both agree and disagree with this ruling. I disagree that there is no irreparable harm by Trump not providing a reason. The law requires it to create transparency and accountability. However, I agree that technically, the inspectors general are not the people harmed by this. So it shouldn't have been them suing Trump, it should have been democrat congressmen and congresswomen who are owed an explanation.
It's on a record he broke law. Can't do anything while he has presidential immunity. He won't have presidential immunity forever.
But there is something the courts can do that doesn't involve punishment: simply order the administration to re-hire the IGs with back pay and scrub the termination from the record. That's the actual legal remedy in this situation.
If Trump makes it to 2026 I'll be mildly surprised.
Oh sweer summer child, hes never facing consequences if he didnt in the 4 years he wasnt president after starting a coup.
This, they have shown they are afraid of Luigi and Tyler.
That shows us how they think they will be held accountable
"Judge finds Trump violated law" has been the headline for like a decade now.
as well as the whole "does nothing about it" part.
What the fuck?
Trust in the system bro, it’s got checks and balances.
Checks and balances!*
*The checks and balances have now been replaced with criminals and pedophiles. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
More like cheques and account balances.
“Even assuming that the IGA comports with Article II, Plaintiffs’ inability to perform their duties for 30 days is not irreparable harm. Moreover, if the IGs were reinstated, the President could lawfully remove them after 30 days by providing the required notice and rationale to Congress.”
The "irreparable harm" is that the president is being allowed to break the law without consequence. Reinstate them, and if he wants to fire them again, make him do it.
As usual
Judge finds Trump violated law
Authoritarians can have a little ignoring of the laws, as a treat
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
I have no words left