this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
93 points (98.9% liked)

World News

49977 readers
1993 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Call me old, but I don't think that under 16s should be allowed on a dating site even without an social media ban.

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago

I'm confused. Teens officially on a dating site??? Like, without needing to lie about their age??? First time hearing about this.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

So far, I thought this was the norm. Dating apps are basically all 18+ here, although I did encounter kids posing as adults while I still used them

[–] Master167@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree.

Should a government be forcing this? I don't think so. Especially if that requires providing personal information to the internet to enforce compliance.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Who but the government would enforce the law? Because if there is none, there is no reason for the dating app to self-limit their customer base. They might write "you have to be 18+ to use this app" in the T&Cs, but nobody could held them responsible if school kids hang out there with fictional birthdays.

[–] apenstaartje@lemmy.cafe 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No one under 16 should be on a dating app

[–] shads@lemy.lol 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No silly you need to upload your drivers license to some shady 3rd party age verification service to protect 16 year olds from accidentally using dating sites.

They even pinky promised to not store your data in some vibe coded system that will leak it all the first time a hacker so much as scans for api end points.

Now stop asking questions and grant front camera permissions so our AI that is maybe 75% accurate cab guess your age.

[–] chiocciola@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 day ago

Fucking leaky vibes.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, “even dating apps” is kind of strange wording.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 8 points 1 day ago

Especially dating apps would make so much more sense

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

The pieces of software the article mentions are:

Meta – Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp

Snap

Tiktok

YouTube

X

Roblox

Pinterest

Discord

Lego Play

Reddit

Kick

GitHub

HubApp

Match

Steam

Twitch

Sketchy ID verification aside, I agree with everything except for GitHub and YouTube.

YouTube is such a resource for DIY and learning, you just can't ban kids from it, even if parts of it are sketchy. A restricted mode for kids would be better.

GitHub is also a huge database of knowledge, important for being techy and computer literate, and doesn't really even have much on the way of social features. Banning this would be asinine.

I was initially against Steam, but then I realized that parents could still buy their kids games, and it's probably better to force parents to take responsibility for that anyways.

[–] theUwUhugger@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is lemmy not on the list?!??? WHAT WERE THEY THINKING? We are so gonna be flooded with teens…

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The rest of the world

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good. The vast majority of social media is corporate cancer and kids should have a chance to develop critical thinking skills before they start using it.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

where else do you passively get information?

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

People seem to forget that a great multitude of information sources existed prior to social media - even on the Internet.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

I mean, probably best to keep <16yos off dating apps...

The rest of it, yeah. I heard Github is also possibly on the list? XD

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every time I hear about another overreach from the eSafety commissioner I think I of this song https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fw-1K8Fr4QA

Big Mother is watching you. Mother’s protecting you. Mommy knows what’s right for you.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

btw you know she worked as a "government relations manager" for twitter, adobe and microshit before landing this job