this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
315 points (95.9% liked)

Linux Gaming

21321 readers
417 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Playing some Counter-Strike 2 and then a GNOME donation notification pops up 😅

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

GNOME alone is like 60% of the reason why stock Ubuntu and all of its derivatives suck. It's like a mashup of ChromeOS and MacOS, two of the most god awful UX designs this past decade.

Compiz by itself kicks GNOME out of the water, despite it being a now legacy compositor from 2007.

Most annoyingly, even RPM distros like Fedora offer it as default, despite having a fully supported KDE option right there, along with any other DE that you might want like XFCE, LXQt, Cinnamon, MATE, etc.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 hours ago

I don't completely hate MacOS, it's pretty nice IMO.

GNOME instantly gets replaced by KDE Plasma though. With Cosmic also installed for some fun alpha testing.

[–] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 hours ago

📎 Looks like you're trying to hold B! Would you like help with that?

[–] sefra1@lemmy.zip 14 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

Nevermind the donation pop-up, how can people use gnome? It's unusable, it interface is literally the worse UI I've ever had the displeasure of using only second to macOS.

I believe that gnome is actually what is keeping many people away from gnu/linux, since it's default on many distros, people install "linux" and they get gnome and gnome sucks so they hate on linux instead of hating gnome.

[–] nlgranger@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Gnome also has a few nice things that I miss whenever I try kde or cosmic. It really depends on what you need from your DE.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

I do not like cosmic. They remove random features i use a ton.

Like accessing a file address in the address bar. Why. Why can it not show the file path.

Also keyboard shortcuts rarely work. If I extract and archive, I have to mouse it all. No alt+e for extract here, nope.

Also pop shop on popos is horribly optimized.

[–] sfjvvssss@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I use it and like it. No strong opinion here, it just works well for me.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

I was into it back when Gnome 3 came out... the problem is that I had to fill too many "holes" (for me, maybe not for everyone) in the functionality with extensions and those were quirky as fuck. You never knew what was going to stop working (or work differently) any day but without them, I could not function properly

And just to give you an idea of how tolerant I am with risk... my daily driver now is Garuda Linux with Hyprland instead of a desktop that I configured from scratch... my browser of choice is FireDragon which is a fork of Floorp which is a fork of Firefox

I am certain it is better now than it was back then... but once you are comfortable with an environment, it is a pretty tall order to switch around.

[–] yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Well, I use it, I like it, and I can confidently say it's not for everyone

You gotta think the gnome way. Like, for example, I don't feel the absence of the minimize button because I adopted gnome's workspace-based flow

It doesn't get in my way, I don't even feel its existence most of the time. Gnome 3 sucked and definitely got in my way but beware that I am talking about gnome 4x here.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Context: I'm an i3 and plasma user depenending on my machine with one exception.

I find Gnome to be in the way 100% of the time, until I put the mist and konquer down and start using the touchscreen. Its a nice DE for touch oriented devices, but it really sucks to navigate with moist and keybread imho.

Edit: the one time I don't fix my spelling someone comes along and says something. I'm gonna make it worse 😈

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Ah, yes, the classic …

  • noise and keyboard

  • moist and keyboard

  • morse and keyboard

Re: edit

Yes! Embrace the typo. Elevate it to art!

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

moist and keybread

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What’s wrong with the MacOS UI? It works pretty well, and is pretty easy to pick up. Some of the biggest complaining I heard back in the day is that the close/min/max buttons were on the other side and someone who can’t handle that doesn’t have an opinion worth entertaining. Most of it was just a extreme refusal to learn out of spite which is more embarrassing for them than an argument.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

I don't hate macOS, and I don't even know if I consider it worse than Windows, but here are a few things I dislike.

  1. Overuse of icons with no clear way to turn on labels combined with a weirdly high time for tooltips to appear makes things confusing.
  2. Finder doesn't have a way to just go up a directory or easily type/get the path of the current folder. The home folder is not in the shortcut area by default.
  3. "Alt tabbing" between windows behaves very differently, though it's not necessarily worse, just different. Command tab switches programs. Command back tick switches windows of that program. So if you want to switch between windows of a browser it is a different shortcut. This one is entirely opinion based. But still, there's no way to change the behavior.
  4. Notifications go away after a very short time period or stay forever. There isn't an easy way to get them to stick around longer without making them stay until you dismiss them. It'd be nice to have a middle ground between a few seconds and forever.
  5. Closing a window doesn't necessarily close a program. Like the "alt tabbing" thing this is opinion based too, because these approaches both technically predate the other approach. Sometimes you close a window and it has a dot on the task bar meaning it's still running. It's very odd.
[–] Soup@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
  1. I’m not really sure why this is a major sticking point but if you truly cannot find apps because their name isn’t showing then you just need swipe for launchpad and start typing, they’ll show up. If you have that many apps that look the same I’m really not even sure what you’re up to or how you pulled it off.
  2. Correct, this is ass and I have no clue what the hell is going on. I think there is a way but it should be easier, and the default, and it is incredible that it’s been like this for so long.
  3. Sounds like a you problem. There are so many ways to make do it the way that works best for you and with their trackpad, which is objectively better than any other trackpad out there, it’s super easy. You can pull fingers together to show everything on that desktop or uses a few fingers to swap between desktops. You can keep stuff on the side of a desktop, too. There are so many options to make it work and pretty much all of them respond to a simple wave of your hand.
  4. What an odd complaint. It’s a notification just to tell you something is happening that you should then go look for, and you can swipe and see them all so I really don’t understand what the big deal is. I have mine for always on because I can be forgetful, and my phone is set to remind me of texts 3 different times over the course of 0-4min so I don’t miss them.
  5. Yea, sometimes you need to fully quit a program. I can’t exactly say why it does it that way instead of making closing the program instant death but it’s never really bothered me. There Windows programs, for example, that also need to be fully closed but they won’t tell you and will just have a bunch of stuff running that you can see in task manager. It’s not an exclusive quirk it simply just that MacOS doesn’t try to hide it.

Look, despite being largely completely unremarkable in either any positive or negative ways I will concede that Finder does have that major issue in #2 but the rest really aren’t issues, I’m sorry.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 31 minutes ago* (last edited 27 minutes ago)

I mean, I never really said it was a big deal, I made it very clear. Why are you being so defensive about it lol. Are you a UI designer at Apple or something?

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

Finder is ass, no feature to get filepath, no feature to open location in terminal, no way to go to parent folder (the button that looks like it does this actually is a "back" button that takes you to previous location).

Also you can't quit Finder for some reason. On my Debian VM I can quit Dolphin. Finder is probably embedded to show files on the desktop. (I've never understood having the desktop be a directory, seems like bloat to me.)

Overall the DE is a lot worse than Plasma:

  • Why isn't the Dock (taskbar that eats 300 to 1200 MB of ram) a screen edge for moving windows
  • Why won't you let me customize stuff
  • Why are app actions in the DE top bar rather than the window name bar

It's also a walled garden that intentionally makes compiling apps for it hard for small devs (you need to be verified by apple to have your app not be flagged as "probably a virus")

The only good thing about MacOS is that it is a very stable OS that rarely needs fixing.

I'm installing Asahi Linux as soon as it supports DisplayPort over USB-C.

[–] CodeBlooded@programming.dev 6 points 8 hours ago (6 children)

Arch user here who enjoys Gnome because I started my Linux journey over a decade ago with Ubuntu. Tell me which desktop environment I should be using. Which desktop environment will make me question why I’ve spent so much time with Gnome?

[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

GNOME is a great desktop environment. Ignore the people here who are whining; there's always a bunch in any DE-related Linux post, regardless of the DE being discussed.

But, just to add to the discussion, KDE is the only real alternative as far as feature parity is concerned (that isn't just a fork).

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

They all have pros and cons. If you like how it works out of the box, you've already won.

I ran Gnome for years with a collection of plugins and hidden gsettings to make it windows95-esque. Bottom bar, left apps, small bars, multi-screen, stacked windows, full time and date in the tray.

And every gnome update, a plugin or two would break, and I'd go find someone else's plugin that did the same thing, but wouldn't break.

Finally, I tried KDE on a new install, and it was exactly how I wanted it out, out of the box.

It's been a long time now. For all I know, Gnome supports all that up front in config.

but if it's how you want it, that's all you need.

[–] suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The issue is that GNOME is incredibly opinionated and makes it very difficult, if not impossible to configure some basic functionality that every other DE has options for. GNOME will work for you if you want a DE that works exactly the way stock GNOME works, but as soon as you want to change anything, you run into a brick wall. Nearly any other Linux DE can be configured to look and work similar to GNOME, but GNOME can't be configured to work like anything other than the vanilla GNOME the devs insist you must use. It's the antithesis of Linux IMO (modularity, reconfigurability, config-file-driven) and acts more like a MacOS skin.

[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 9 points 8 hours ago

If Gnome has worked for you the past ten years then keep using it.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago
[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

Just use Linux Mint.

[–] BootLoop@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What distro? I've been using GNOME on Ubuntu and Debian for the past five years and I don't recall ever seeing a donation notification.

[–] MyCodeZero@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago

That is because it's new to gnome 49, debian and Ubuntu aren't bleeding edge to have them

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I got exactly this notification on Arch last night

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

GNOME on Arch just feels so wrong to me...

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I use hyprland by default but especially apps running under wine don't really like tiling window managers, Wayland , or both.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I mean no judgement, don't get me wrong. No need to defend yourself in any way. The whole joy of Linux is setting up your system how you want it. That totally checks out though.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 31 points 1 day ago

Don't be a loser with no defuser!

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm not sure why people enable any notifications on their desktop in the first place.

[–] jonathan@piefed.social 257 points 2 days ago (3 children)

To be notified of things that they want to know about.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hubi@feddit.org 65 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Whenever I start a game on my KDE desktop, the notifications get muted automatically. I have no idea why, because I really don't remember setting it up. Maybe it's a standard feature that was added at some point. It's honestly pretty great though.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›