this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
457 points (98.5% liked)

Science Memes

16854 readers
983 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 94 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Now show the testing rate over the same time period!

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 2 days ago

Anti-vaxxers: No.

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

The axis makes sense with the label, they just didn't label every data point.

10 out of a 1000 to 30ish out of a 1000 doesn’t even seem like a massive increase, especially if it’s really due to something like a pain medication that is taken by a huge population. Which it’s not as it’s more related to improvements in diagnosing.

I guess they are just hoping people see bar go up and therefore bad.

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This graph will live forever, in intro classes, as an example of how not to do things.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Im confused, it's got both axis labeled and seems pretty easy to read.

Maybe points off for having the labels on the outside rim of the graphic.

Doesn't change the fact that classification of autism also changed over those years, but the graph itself is okay.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Guarantee you the people afraid of autism has no idea what it even is, other than "bad"

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a vast number of conservative parents who have said they would support abortion in cases of fetal abnormalities like "autism" because they're not pro-life or informed about anything, they're just scared. They're scared of hardships, they're scared of emotional labor, they're scared of the social stigmas around having to care for someone with special needs, they're scared they won't love a child who isn't normal, and will be judged for it.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not possible to diagnose an autism until the age of about four or five at the earliest so I'm not sure how they're planning to do that

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

They don't think in logical, reasonable systems, they imagine stories. The entire conservative mindset is narratives and feelings. That's why things like vaccines and tylenol go so hard for them, it's an easy McGuffin to comprehend and work into their mental storylines.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lies, damn lies, and statistics.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 35 points 2 days ago

Before you get more downvotes, it's a reference folks: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lies,_damned_lies,_and_statistics

[–] rirus@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

What's wrong with the x-Axis?

[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think it’s birth cohorts

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

prevalence of cancer has increased ∞% since 0 BC

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 11 points 1 day ago

It looks nepotism put a failson in charge of this graph.

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 9 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Can anyone decipher the graph for me?

[–] kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago

The line went up which usually good. The very best. We have the best lines in this great country. But Bobby said this isn't a good line so I said, I told them, we need to find out why the line is bad. And I've got people on it who say don't take Tylenol. So that's all that needs to be said. Don't. Take. Tylenol.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Can somebody smarter than me tell me what this is trying to say? There’s a bar for surveillance year and birth year. But, for instance, 2012 is on the graph twice with different values. What does it mean?

Edit:

I think I got it. The graph is of “Autism rates in 8 year olds over time”. And the X axis should just be year (in 2 year increments).

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 days ago (4 children)

2012 appears once as a birth year and once as a surveillance year. The graph says that they only ever surveyed 8-year-olds, since the birth year is always 8 less than the surveillance year.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

There is an 𝑥 axis and it's not too hard to comprehend, although I'd prefer the dividing character to be newline rather than "|", or only show the surveillance year.

Also, the "trendline" is sus, an actual trendline cannot always be above data.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

When people say autism they think of the nonverbal kind not the model train kind.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also remember that we only had diagnostic tools for adult autism beginning in the 1980s.

The rise of autism diagnosis does not necessarily equal a rise in autism.

load more comments (1 replies)

That's like saying we have more cancer now than in the past.

Sure, that might be true in certain scenarios (we're very good at creating new ways to give ourselves cancer).

The truth is that we're living longer, increasing the risk and likelihood of cancer, and we've gotten a LOT better at finding and diagnosing cancer and specific types.

[–] Plum@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

....................... did they adjust the data points to go from lowest to highest

......so the chart go up?

.....

*I wrote down the data on a napkin and it makes more sense. These fuckers made a Bad Graph.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Caffeinated_Sloth@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Military spending also increased from 2000-2022, ergo military spending causes autism.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›