this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
112 points (84.6% liked)

News

32434 readers
3960 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There it is. Democrats could easily walk back stances on guns and it would hurt them less than this pollster brained idiocy.

All democrats have to say is "government has more important things to do than regulate sports, there are sports commissions that have asked and answered these questions. This is politicians seeking another way to intrude upon our lives."

[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

This shit again? I can't believe we're still talking about this like it's an issue that matters AT ALL.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 16 points 1 day ago

And we all know, sports is the most important thing right now. Or ever.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 21 points 1 day ago

Why should I give a shit what a politician says about fucking sports, period?

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ooo yeah let's be concerned over the, what .002% of our population doing things they wanna do and being who they wanna be. Yeah that's a big talking point when 80% of the rest of the country can't afford rent.

Fuck. Just leave trans people alone already Jesus Christ...

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

I was about to say its's 0.75% for USA, but your are probably right once you factor in how many Trans people then have to care about getting into a sport.

USA seems to think every citizen plays or watches sports.

I have had coworkers and randos ask if I saw the game last night, so I have to ask which game? They mention a football/hockey/baseball game. I reply that I don't watch team sports. They then continue to talk about the game like I'm a decades old fan catching up on what I missed. At this stage I've tuned out the details and am actually wondering how their whole life centers around somebody elses accomplishments in a city they have never been to. And also wondering how they missed the cue that I'm not interested in sports.

But that is USA; identity based on guns and sports. Trans somehow becomes an attack on their identity.

[–] Kepion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 2 days ago
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 86 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’m also concerned for their safety and wellbeing. That’s why you’re concerned, right Mrs. Harris?

…That’s why you’re concerned, right?

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Anakin and Padme Meme

Concerned about, not for.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 64 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Fucking spineless weathervane. No wonder she lost. Focus group driven decision making.

[–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Out of all the trans issues you care about trans sports? It's almost like you want people to hate us. Who am I kidding that's exactly why. Fucking right wing shills in the DNC. Out of every issue with trans people, Americas by majority are supportive except for mf trans sports, because of course it's extremely stupid, especially if you aren't going to let kids have some hrt when they want to transition. No coincidence there. Of course that's what they will pick to run on because the DNC is controlled by the same fucking hateful dipshits that control the rest of the state. The DNC will do everything in its power to make sure the Republicans win because they know their voters are stupid enough to help them implement a police state and mass surveillance and turn America into an autocracy. Fuck the DNC.

Don't forget in the last election you didn't hear a peep out of the fucking DNC only for their candidate to pull out right at the end to guarantee trump a win. That should tell you how Americans really feel. The only people who vote Republicans at this point are a few mentally retarded people and some boomers with dementia. They lie about everything.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 2 days ago (15 children)

Oh look it’s not just Newsom and that rep from Georgia anymore. The spineless democrats are testing the waters now to see how throwing trans people under the bus will go.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

Everything that comes put of Kamala's mouth concerns culture war crap. I'm convinced she's just a MAGA sock puppet, because not only does she have no chance of winning over republican voters, but also now alienated democrat voters with this crap. Unbelievable!

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This ends up being very effective as a wedge issue for Republicans, because they can make shit up about the other side, and run against the lies they tell themselves, because the truthful situation is complicated and the lie is simpler to understand.

Some sports are strictly separated by gender, and some are not. Generally speaking, it's people who administer the leagues that make that decision. Everything from pro leagues down to rec leagues will have rules based on gender, and they are created by whoever administers the leagues to foster competition.

I don't feel qualified to know which sports confer a distinct advantage to people who go through male puberty. It certainly isn't all of them, but there must be some where it makes sense to exclude humans who have gone through male puberty from women's leagues. But, I don't feel most politicians are qualified to know that, either. People who know each sport best should make that decision, based on science and the knowledge of their sport, and politicians should just butt out. But you get better soundbites by lying about it and airing grievances about it than by being rational.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

It's only a wedge issue because of people like Harris. If she had a spine and decent values, she could have explained that actually trans athletes in sports are not a serious concern, because look at the data FFS.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Did no one actually read the article past the vaguely misleading headline?

“I agree with the concerns expressed by parents and players that we have to take into account biological factors such as muscle mass and unfair student athletic advantage when we determine who plays on which teams, especially in contact sports,” Harris reportedly wrote. “With goodwill and common sense, I believe we can come up with ways to do this, without vilifying and demonizing children.”

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My problem with the article is how much air Americans give to the topic of trans athletes in sports when Americans have more pressing problems. Healthcare, affordability of life, violence are real issues affecting Americans much more than sports games. I don't think giving air to this conversation is helping Americans.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

That's the entire point of all these "culture war" issues. They're used as distractions for more pressing matters, that the ruling class really doesn't want to address, because they know conservatives will be outraged by them, and progressives won't be able to just let people be victimized, for no reason. If the public tires itself out, fighting over topics like these, there's a better chance we won't have the energy to demand real action on more expensive things.

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Oh, so they are going to mandate weight and height classes across the board for all sports and stop separating sport by gender?

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Prior to Republicans passing laws to outright ban transgender athletes from participating altogether, they actually had standards in place for how long athletes had to be on HRT, before they were allowed to compete. By all physical accounts, this meant that those athletes had comparable muscle mass and bone densities to the gender they identified as.

What else would you expect? Even between biological girls of the same age, there are significant differences between individual athletes. Once you include training, diet and other normal genetic factors...the differences between a trans athlete on HRT and a cis athlete is actually well within those standard margins. Any advantage they might have, comes from skill and training alone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"with goodwill and common sense, I believe we can..."

When the folks across the aisle you're champing at the bit to reach demonstrate goodwill and common sense, maybe you might have a ghost of a chance. Until such time, you're validating the position that trans women have no place in established sports.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chozo@fedia.io 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Jesus fucking Christ, sports shouldn't be a political issue at all. It's literally a fucking game, the government and politicians shouldn't be involved in this shit at all in the first place. We should care about as much about Kamala's opinion on the WNBA as we do about her opinion on Minecraft. The leagues are privately-owned companies, let them run their fucking company how they want (which up to this point, has been trans-inclusive).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

My first reaction especially given other things I've heard about this book was Wtf is wrong with this lady?

The full quote is not quite as bad as I assumed:

“I agree with the concerns expressed by parents and players that we have to take into account biological factors such as muscle mass and unfair student athletic advantage when we determine who plays on which teams, especially in contact sports,” Harris reportedly wrote. “With goodwill and common sense, I believe we can come up with ways to do this, without vilifying and demonizing children.”

Every time somebody brings up concerns over trans athletes I always think about these images of Katherine Switzer running the Boston Marathon:

I question why we have gender divisions in the first place, bc it's definitely not that society was ever concerned about fairness. The reason gender divisions were created in the first place, is the same reason we originally had racial based divisions until one day we didn't.

That guy wasn't physically assaulting Switzer and trying to stop her from becoming the first woman to run the Boston Marathon bc he was concerned she may be at an unfair disadvantage. He was trying to stop her bc back when the marathon first started somebody made "No girls allowed!" one of the rules, and this guy was uncomfortable with change. It seems pretty obvious now, that was just a dumb and unnecessary rule to begin with.

If this is all really about fairness like people claim, then maybe we should consider just nixing gender divisions entirely and moving to something like weight class or skill level divisions for competitive sports.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

There are plenty of sports where gender divisions basically dont exist until you hit the college level. Hockey is a prime example. There are all-girls select youth teams, but all teams that arent exclusively for girls are open to anyone that can hang. There are plenty of girls that play competitively with boys through highschool hockey. There are plenty of women who play with men at the adult level in beer leagues and the like. But at the juniors, college, pro, and olympic levels they are gender divided.

Realistically at the highest levels of play some division does make sense, as that is where the highest level of physicality is allowed, and generally that is the reason why it can be less safe for women to be playing alongside men. As well as the fact that few women would be playing college or pro hockey if there were not gender divisions.

That said however, I see no reason why the odd woman that can hang in upper levels hockey shouldnt be allowed to play, nor would they be barred from doing so if they could. Likewise I can see how forcing womens upper leagues of the sport to accept cis men who cant hang in the upper levels of mens hockey would push women out of the sport. So it makes sense that they have exclusivity there.

Its one of those issues where I have no issue with gender divisions at the highest levels, in the interest of allowing a professional level of womens sport to exist, but at the same time trying to apply that same logic to youth sports completely falls apart. All youth sports should be just be open gendered competitions. If you see open-gendered hockey at the 12-14 year old level the girls are often 1-2ft taller than any of the boys and physically the more dominant group, and yet no one says the boys’ safety is at risk over it.

Not to mention that lost in all of the trans fear-mongering is the fact that when people take hormones their bodies significantly change. If someone born male starts hormone therapy to transition, their feet will shrink, they will lose muscle mass, so on and so forth. So at the end of the day they truly have zero physical advantages over cis women they would compete with in sport. Women’s leagues in the upper levels of a sport make sense, but it also makes perfect sense to allow transwomen to play with them. People dont seem to understand that male physicality is the result of a continual supply of hormones making you look as you are, not solely the result of past hormonally influenced growth. If you cut off the hormones making you a big strong man, you will no longer be big nor strong

[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 2 points 1 day ago

There was even a woman goaltender for the Tampa Bay Lightning organization in the 1990s! She tried out for the team and was in minor league hockey for five years.

She did play in two preseason NHL games, in 1991 (allowing two goals on nine shots) and 1993.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I think divisions at the highest level are understandable, but does it absolutely have to be gender based division?

For contact sports like hockey, it would be interesting to see if you really went with a strict division by something like weight class how much would gender really change competitiveness?

Even in gender based divisions for noncontact sports like basketball, individual skill level can be more important than mass. Mugsy Bogues was a pretty rare case, but he was 5'3" and holding his own with guys that were well over 6' tall.

Maybe divisions with some combination of weight and skill level? Or some other factor? Idk I feel like we'll never really know until somebody is willing to try.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

Neoliberal garbage. This is why she lost to literal fascists.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 days ago

And behold the thing that I said was going to happen, has happened. More democrats engaging in transphobia to try to pry votes away from the fascist party by being fascist-lite.

Can we stop pretending the democrats can be reformed now? Their leadership has time and time again proven they do not give one fuck about progressive politics.

[–] higgsboson@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This comment section could be a case study about how China and Russia have used wedge issues to divide America. This kneejerk bullshit is why we have an orange goomba in the white house.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PenguinMage@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

There is no goddamn problem! Fuck sake I should not have to choose fascist asshole or shifty semi fascist.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›