That article was printed in the 1930s, test showed that the concept was flawed, and development stopped.
So to answer your question, the 1930s
this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
19 points (95.2% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
196 readers
189 users here now
Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!
Rules:
- Posts must abide by Piefed.social terms and conditions
- No racism or other bigotry allowed.
- Obviously nothing illegal.
If you see these please report them.
Related communities:
!forgottenweapons@lemmy.world
For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
I can't believe they stopped for something so minor. "Flawed concept", "poor test results", smh, Cold War military budgets would never have given up so quickly
One thing is sure though, had it been developed during the cold war, it would have had a cooler name.
And on that topic, here is one if the coolest named projects from the cold war, the Boeing X-20:
Self-stabilization algorhythms, sensors, and gyroscopes are in pletiful supply.
Considering the military-industrial complex's disinterest, you or I have as good a chance of making one, working out the kinks and getting it sold in mass quantities as anyone.
Sorry if that makes you sad.