this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
816 points (98.8% liked)

News

32434 readers
3958 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] F_State@midwest.social 8 points 17 hours ago

“I support the Democrat in the race,” Talk about a backhanded compliment.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

It's about damn time.

[–] caboose2006@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love how what would have been mundane and not news worthy with any other candidates (democratic politicians endorsing a democratic candidate for mayoral office) now makes headlines with Mamdani. And by love I mean hate.

[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

It’s going to be wild when he gets in and starts making decisions that are actually quite popular and seeing mainstream dems fall all over each other to claim that they were with him all along.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world -2 points 16 hours ago

Please don't. Just go away

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Kamala Harris finally sees which way the wind is blowing.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago

so did HOCHUL, after she deriding madami, so i think they are doing it to save face.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Watch the whole interview, its so bad. She has terrible instincts.

Her "endorsement": I support the democrat, but there are other stars too, like <insert 2 names I literally never heard of> from other mayoral races. Just pissing on the most popular candidate in the country and taking 2 random mayors down with her, instead of "Mandami is great, and I'm really hopeful about these other guys"

She complains that "titans of industry" didn't step in to stop Trump. Her goal isn't to help the american people, but to "restore the guardrails of our institutions". Isn't her dad supposed to be a Marxist? Have they never been in a room for 5 minutes?

Turns out Newsom is as petty as you would expect, while Pelosi and Obama were so ideologically westwing-brained they were more concerned about Biden "having his moment" than actually winning.

Close friend of Trump and Epstein, Bill Clinton, seemed eager to support anyone who had a better shot than post-shitting-himself-debate Biden.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] coffee_nutcase207@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago (10 children)

I'm a actually not that cynical of it. In her book she was critical of who the establishment in the Biden administration treated her.

Worse case is she's endorsing him to make her self look good. But honestly I think it's great she did endorse him. It will go a long way with causal/centrist democrats and centerist independents.

[–] eronth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 2 days ago (8 children)

It's kinda how I feel about corporations supporting good things. People will point out that they're only doing it for money or whatever, but I don't care. If they all start supporting and normalizing good things, I don't care that it started for dumb reasons.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I studied environmental sciences in school, so the metaphor I think of is that of indicator species, which provide information about the state of an ecosystem. For example, the presence of mayflies indicates good water quality, since poor water quality disrupts part of their lifecycle. Similarly, corporations supporting good things indicates that they feel it is profitable to do so. It indicates the state of public sentiment, and I don't see how that's anything but good news.

Same with Harris (indirectly) endorsing Mamdani: Maybe she's just bending with the wind, but it's good news because of the way the wind is blowing.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

good business just backs both sides, hence why media like Time will release editions with "conservative"/democrat leaning cover-arts, for specific parts of the country.

anything and everything to keep people inside their bubbles

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

shes probably still looking for political career somewhere in the future, just not now.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago

I'm taking the broad position that last-minute endorsements of Mamdani are just saving face for the establishment. That window closes in mid-October or so.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

she has to, since most of the DNC sides with jefferies/schumer with israel and also the billionaires.

[–] HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip 147 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pretty tepid endorsement but somehow still better than many of her peers

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 139 points 2 days ago (20 children)

She tried to pivot to others in the party...

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 158 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 105 points 2 days ago (21 children)

It's still fucked considering she was better in every way compared to the other option. That said, yes she has zero charisma and authenticity. Her entire platform is consultancy-crafted buzzwords and ambiguity.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It was exceedingly obvious 2024 was a populist election, and she let Trump take that mantle and run with it. Bernie would have mopped the floor with these corporatists. This is why Mamdani is ascendant.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Please donate to Harris, it's the only way to win."

That's the only message I got from her. Lots of talk around other messages but the one they hammered home in all their canvassing, sms and such was MONEY.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nuggie_ss@lemmings.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, those few citizens not buying their bullshit can make all the difference.

It's why we should focus all of our efforts on making sure people like her never become the nominee, because that's essentially handing the presidency to the republicans.

Nominating hillary fucking clinton in 2016 over Bernie Sanders was bonkers. I don't think the nation will ever recover from that blunder, and we still don't put the blame where it belongs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 15 points 2 days ago

Just the worst possible instincts.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 26 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Isn't there overwhelming polling saying he is likely to win? Harris hitches herself to whoever is likely to win. That is her entire career.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Alternately, her endorsement is another way the Democratic establishment is trying to make him lose. 😉

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago

We all see right through you Kamala.

[–] frozenpopsicle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm sure it was based on her deep beliefs, and not a decision made by strategists for her. We are so fucked...

[–] Rekhyt@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't look a gift horse on the mouth

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Why would she care. She could likely apply for political asylum in say France and leave the country and never have to work another day in her life. She's 60, she doesn't owe anyone anything. She won't run for president, and I doubt she wants to enter another 4 years of VP from 64-68 years old.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 44 points 2 days ago

In the most unenthusiastic way possible. But it's better than an outright rejection.

[–] YoHoHoAndAVialOfKetamine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

Wow look she does lean left! /s

[–] jonne 32 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Only when she's not running for anything.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] nuggie_ss@lemmings.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People who have lost to donald trump need to be permanently benched.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 15 points 2 days ago (12 children)

The DNC:✍️Women✍️and✍️POC✍️need✍️to✍️be✍️permanently✍️benched✍️

[–] hector@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just because someone is a woman or minority does not mean that women or minorities will support them. Frankly it is rather insulting that you think it would.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's not what I am saying at all. I am saying instead of looking at the deeply unpopular messaging and policy of "secure the border", "most lethal military" and "part of a down-payment for first-generation homebuyers who have gone 5 years without a late rent payment and submit whole positive values for X, Y, and Z where X/(Y+Z)+Y/(X+Z)+Z/(X+Y) is equal to your SSN" that lost the election, the DNC will conclude the problem was Kamala's gender and race, and then proceed to ratfuck progressives under the delusion that republican-lite is more electable than improving the material conditions of the people who you want to vote for you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›