this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
222 points (99.6% liked)

politics

25783 readers
2742 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive article: https://archive.ph/xcW8y

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Redditsux@lemmy.world 86 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This is nuts. You sure there's no civil war in US?

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 76 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This isn't the civil war stage. These deployments are to 1) normalize a military dictatorship and 2) force the antifascist non-loyalists to resign; from disgust of being pulled away from their families, day jobs, and lives to be used as political pawns.

All of project 2025 is about purging antifascist non-loyalists from every government institution. There's a much greater likelihood that the dictatorship and domestic authoritarianism will succeed when the dictatorship isn't being sabotaged by real patriots from within.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Need General's and commanders to step up. Defend the constitution, not the orange mango loser

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I have been wondering what the fuck the military leaders have been doing this whole time. I thought they had honour and shit, and cared about the idea of America. They literally signed up to fight for it.

Anyway, not American but hoping those folk have a come-to-Jesus moment soon…

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Generations of "service guarantees socialistic benefits equivalent to every other first world country" led to people overwhelmingly joining for personal gain, instead of "service" or "sacrifice".

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That makes sense since all I ever hear about is how well veterans are treated. Who wouldn’t want in?!

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Especially when your only alternative is poverty or medical/education debt.

Also the Trump admin have been hard at work implementing Project2025 from day 1, which involved purging all of the patriot military brass they possibly can. The average US general likely never even contemplated the thought of staging a domestic coup their entire careers, then they got canned; the ones that remain are probably wondering how they could possibly pull off a coup when the forces they oversee contain a significant number of brainwashed individuals.

The American MIC may simply be too large, distributed, and bureaucratic for any type of coup to occur.

[–] krunklom@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd imagine if they're going to act then they're waiting for some line to be crossed.

Not sure where that line would be but.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe a violent Insurrection trying to kill Congress and steal the country?

Oh yeah...

There is no line.

[–] krunklom@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And maybe trump was actually protecting people when he was balls deep in kindergarteners.

Some shit is such nonsense that even hypothesisizing is giving unwarranted credibility

[–] krunklom@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Alrighty then.

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

fucking lol

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A civil war implies two sides at war.

This is more of a dictatorship

[–] UnmetPlayer@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

The political term is auto-coup.

A government in power overthrowing the system that got them to power to hold on to their position.

[–] apenstaartje@lemmy.cafe 10 points 2 days ago

Whites aren’t getting shot yet

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 24 points 2 days ago

So that's what he meant by America First. Removing troops from all over the world to deploy them against his own people.

The tyranny, authoritarianism, fascism, it's all there clear as day. But I bet the media will pontificate over trees until nobody sees the forest anymore.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

US Troop Deployment Increases In Country

Oh hey I've seen this episode before.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

How are 35,000 people actually okay with doing this... :(

[–] Bonus@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Least Successful Mission Ever

[–] one_step_behind@quokk.au 7 points 2 days ago

I mean Vietnam and Afghanistan are still major failures for the US as well. They clearly are not worth what is spent on them.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Taco keeps on having America punch itself in the nuts.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

It's almost like it's what Putin wants.

Those are expensive, put them back!!!

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

And this is not full escalation yet, either. I bet there will be another «Reichstag fire», very soon.

Guess it's time for another surge