this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
739 points (98.6% liked)

Microblog Posts

102 readers
492 users here now

Shareworthy Microblogs.

Blacklisted websites:

founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS
739
Old Web (infosec.pub)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Pro@reddthat.com to c/micro@reddthat.com
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Make a website! No one is stopping you.

I have a few.

No one visits them though haha

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

People are acting like the fediverse will someday blow up. These days, if you want any sort of recognition, you need centralized social media. An example is comedians. Social media changed that whole profession.

If the Internet were a high school, decentralized social media certainly wouldn't be the cool kids. They wouldn't even be as cool as the band kids. They would be behind the DND/anime kid table watching over wishing they could be there.

[–] NovaSel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I'll check it out. Url?

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Maybe we need to start webrings again

[–] De_Narm@lemmy.world 55 points 4 days ago (1 children)

While he's got a point, he's literally using a Ghibli AI picture.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh no. He's not literally perfect!

[–] josefo@leminal.space 2 points 3 days ago

I know right

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yes but unfortunately it’s riddled with constant US politics, which I understand why, but the early internet was far more blissfully ignorant in that regard, or maybe I just didn’t care cause I was younger.

[–] stray@pawb.social 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You didn't get invited to WhiteHouse.com via Yahoo chat when you were 12?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

It was just some dude called JD Vance talking about bombing stuff. Worst cyber ever.

[–] BootLoop@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The centralized stuff is riddled with US politics too. Wish we could make some fediverse stuff that is free of Americans and their political discussions.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Speaking as an American: do it, please.

US politics on Lemmy is a repetitive echo chamber anyway, and most of it over posts linking to attention farms. I'd much rather lurk Euro, South American, African, Asian, Aussie, whatever politics.

Honestly even the tankies are midly interesting to me. While they're pretty drunk on kool-aid, at least its different and new (to me).

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Tbh, the federated stuff also isn't fully decentralized. It still has quite a few of the pitfalls of a centralized system, even if it's setup on a distributed technology.

We are still relying on mostly one provider of software, there's still one network, large instances still have a ton of power (e.g. if a few large instances defederate a small instance, it's pretty much dead in the water).

If you want to really go decentralized, look back to the old stuff: dedicated bulletin boards and personal websites.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Tbh, the federated stuff also isn’t fully decentralized. It still has quite a few of the pitfalls of a centralized system, even if it’s setup on a distributed technology.

The wrong thing is distributed.

If an instance grows to some massive size (for whatever reason), it will just be the new Reddit, the new Twitter. If that instance gets purchased, the exact same issues await as on Reddit or Twitter.

It's the back-end that should be decentralised while the front-end (all the user-generated content) should be uniformly distributed with backups across the entire fediverse. That way, if an instance goes down, the content and user accounts don't go down with it.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So you are suggesting something akin to a classic distributed data storage system (e.g. something like a torrent) which is used as a backend for purely client-side frontends? Yeah, that could work.

Another option would be something akin to mailing lists. All the data is distributed among the clients and each client is responsible for backing up stuff they care about.

That would work decently for text-only messages, but with images and video, data and bandwith requirements would snowball like crazy.

It's not exactly easy.

I think the easiest option would really be oldschool forums.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, the main problem is the storage required. A p2p kind of setup but with the back-end capable of RAID10-like redundancy, allowing for servers to keep varied amounts of data. With enough distributed servers/clients, no single instance could grow large enough to threaten the whole system.

As for oldschool forums - I think they'd just be a slight downgrade to something like Lemmy. You CAN operate Lemmy like a forum, you just get all the extra stuff on top.

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Without ad revenue, these services rely on your direct support if you want them to continue. Please consider making a monetary or volunteering contribution to your favorite Fediverse instances.

Here is how you can support Lemmy.world for example:

https://lemmy.world/post/35524879

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We've come full circle. Paying for things used to be normal. People used to pay to host their own personal websites. In a world where it was normal to pay for things, it was also normal to pay someone to host your personal website.

There were BBS systems, IRC servers, etc. that used to be paid for by somebody, but the users didn't need to pay. Some geek just had enough cash to spare and liked hosting an IRC server, so she did. Or a school was knowingly (or unknowingly) hosting services that were used by a lot of non-students. The school admins didn't know, the computer admins liked using the services so they didn't mind keeping them running. In the early days, long before the dot-com boom ads were rare. That meant it stayed OK with the schools and stuff. Nobody tried to run an ad-supported IRC server, AFAIK. It just wasn't a thing.

Then "Free (with ads)" became an option, and people started migrating to "Free (with ads)" because, why wouldn't you? The earliest ads weren't all that obnoxious, and once they started getting obnoxious it was easy for the tech-savvy to just block those ads. Now we've started to see the error of our ways. So yeah, please host your own stuff, or if you're using something hosted by someone else, help out however you can.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Also today if you don't want a large "central" site like say lemmy.world, you could just publish your own from your home pc for free. If you don't live in the USA and have to pay for bandwidth I mean 😋.

[–] excral@feddit.org 6 points 3 days ago

The "Old Web" never really went away. It always was and still is a niche. The difference is that back then the entire internet was a niche and the "Old Web" was relatively a big part of it. And, let's face it, most of those people that now use the "New Web" would have never and will use the "Old Web" and to be fair, that's fine. The Fediverse and the "Old Web" in general can be in a very healthy space without being main stream.

[–] hyperhopper@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (5 children)

"No algorithms"??

What do you think "Hot" is? What do you think "active" is? There is some ranking algorithm that picks what to show. If you want to be pedantic, even "top" or "new" are algorithms.

[–] henfredemars 45 points 4 days ago

Perhaps it would’ve been more accurate to say no mysterious, dark-pattern algorithms. The Fediverse has documented, simple algorithms that aren’t trying to manipulate the viewer.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I mean, that's a little pedantic. Those are simple sorts by post attribute, not individualized preference targets. And you explicitly choose your own sort, it isn't assigned secretly and dynamically.

It's the difference between getting junk mail in your mailbox and going through the card catalogue at the library.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 3 days ago

When they say "no algorithms", they mean "no personally tailored bubble for your interests, all done to keep you engaged and enraged, while scrolling past ad impressions"

Obviously there's an algorithm, even if it's just sorting by times voted on in the last hour. It's actually detailed here: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/contributors/07-ranking-algo.html

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Imo Fediverse and instances is unnecessary jargon that presents a barrier to entry to new users.

As the OP said, Newsgroups, email etc ARE decentralized and people have been using them for decades.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (13 children)

What would you rather call them? I feel like you might as well be saying that cruise control is unnecessary jargon and is confusing to new drivers… Okay but would calling it acceleration latch be any less confusing for new drivers?

The defining characteristic of a new user is that they are unfamiliar with the system. You are never going to be able to reason around those who don’t want to learn something new.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

Don’t forget BBS’s

https://www.scisdata.com/connections/issue-4/what-is-an-electronic-bulletin-board/

I ran a few back in the day. Then FidoMail became a thing which you attached as a front end to your BBS. I ran Canadian hub for a while. I also had a separate D&D program a friend wrote that ran with my BBS. To log into the BBS you would use a program like Telix.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FidoNet

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telix

About 3-4 years before internet became a household thing I ran a dating system on an IBM AT clone with 2 8 port serial plugin ports with 16 US Robotic modems with 16 line equiv main number. Could have 16 peops chatting in the forums. Hehe everyone thought it was run off a mainframe. I wish I could remember the name of the custom dating software. I remember it was from California. Had a ton of fun with that site.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The old web is still here.

You don't use social media to recreate it. You make a homepage and you put links to the sites you like on it.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

100%. I've been finding a ton of weird internet forums out there that are an odd mix of people. Fortunately, none of them are loaded with asshole 13 year olds, so it's already objectively better than reddit.

[–] NovaSel@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Where might I find these mystical places?

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I like https://wiby.me/. It's a search engine that only returns old-school pages. I like to click "surprise me" for random sites.

[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] NovaSel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is going to sound cringe as hell but what's neocities?

[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Why would assume being inquisitive as cringe ?? Anyways. It's a host as well as a social-media of sorts but for websites. https://neocities.org/!

[–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

This is the way.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I am completely in favour of supporting my local node with ad revenue. I feel it's a necessary evil, and that the decentralization chills out the aggression with ads. I would be completely amenable to viewing 10% interleaved clearly-marked anonymous ads that are removed from the 'print' view. I'd accept if those ads were tuned to suit the interests of the sub.

I'm grateful for my home instance surviving and for me that's an acceptable tradeoff.

Most ads are shit. Some ads will tell you about a new development - oura ring 6! Now without the slimeball subscription grift! - and some of those new features are actually beneficial.

And yeah, I get that we could disagree on this. I hope that de-fed, and a policy that ads are kept on the local node, will ensure there are nodes supported solely through donation with no ads, to serve its population how they prefer. I'd like that to be a differentiating feature and not "just find one without grade-school edgelordism" instead.

I'm worried that if we become dependent on ads, then we also become beholden to the advertisers. I don't want to have to have to use neutered words like "unalive." Give companies an inch, and they'll take a mile. I'd rather avoid the risk of ads controlling my internet completely.

But it seems we're on the same page about decentralization. There could be ad-sponsored instances for you and user-sponsored instances for me, and we can all get what we prefer. We all win when there are more choices available.

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago

I don't mind if my cable subscription has one or two ads, they need to cover all the fees for their TV licences

I don't mind if YouTube has one or two ads, delivering videos over the internet is costly

Give an inch, and they'll take a mile.

Adverts have been the bane of the internet experience since adverts arrived on the internet.

We must be like Edna from The Incredibles, learn from past mistakes, and take a hard stance against them.

No ads!

[–] goodboyjojo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

yeah, a agree with this post

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago

Glad to be a part of our open past and future with y’all <3

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

For those of us old (and American) enough to remember AOL, we're really just back to that. Open your Facebook (or corporate platform of choice), type a keyword, avoid the Big Scary World Wide Web.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] intentionallyBlue@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Commenting for the algorithm /s

load more comments
view more: next ›