linuxmemes

I'm not afraid of Ubuntu, I'm afraid of the need to use the the Ubuntu forums when I have an issue.

I use arch wiki btw.

+1 for Mint. It's what I give the elders when they need a computer.

Linnux?

Or mint, if you're a newbie

Honestly, i don't like debian and it's derivatives because they focus on stability, and that means packages in the repos get outdated really quick. I'd love a distro that combines a debian base and the rolling release model of arch.

That has ALWAYS been the case. I dont know why people are surprised now... ubuntu has alqays been backed by canonical. And it has always been based on the work of debian. What did people expect?

People have always been saying to just skip the corporate bullshit and go straight to the source... debian

Unfortunately there was a very loud group of people online shitting on debian, saying that it's too difficult or user friendly or whatever... may have been true 10 years ago, but not anymore

It's only LTS. Desktop users rarely use LTS. Great to have live kernel updates on a developer workstation and servers though.

Apparently you can turn those off but I haven't bothered.

If you're using proxmox in a production environment and making money it doesn't cost much at all compared to VMware. I see it as helping fund production of software that right now still seems very solid

Yeah, it's the Cognitive Bias fallacy. Reminds me of all the anti Linux users who continue using the "Linux wont be ready for the average user, because no average user wants to write a compiler from scratch just so they can compile their programs". If you don't like something, you don't like it. No problem, no reason to whine and cry about it. You like a different distro, great, go use it. That's how distro's work. Everything eventually helps everybody and you just pick a distro that gets you close to what you want. I started with Slackware 3.4, to me everything is great.

Why not RHEL then? It even has "enterprise" in the name!

Last I used Ubuntu you do indeed get an ad every time you apt upgrade You can still go into some config file and remove it though

I'm an ubuntu user and it was like that for a brief period but then they removed it after an uproar. I think. I double check it once I'm at my laptop

I'm not opposed to Canonical's monetisation model. I think charging for extra updates and packages is fine as a way to make money. But I can understand why people don't want advertising in their operating system, though I personally think that a simple line of text showing up on my terminal following a flood of package-fetching and script-running results is tolerable.

Oh wow, I didn't know that. Thank you for clarifying.
However I have to say I'm not necessarily against self promotion as companies and organisations have to sustain themselves but advertising your service every time the user updates or upgrades is way too much compared to KDE's once-a-year donation request for example (that can be easily disabled).

On another note I have experienced BTRFS and have seen the light, never returning to ext4 😭😭

... and live kernel security patches, removing the need to reboot out of schedule.

I've paid $$$ for that in commercial settings. Getting it for free is actually crazy.

It's for LTS releases only. So you rarely see it on desktop, but for sure will see it on servers. My previous job, I ran LTS on my work laptop and would laugh at everyone always getting a forced update right before scrum. This new job, I have to use WSL on this Windows laptop and guess what, I'm in forced update hell. I can understand that for some(or most) the pro message would be annoying, but I'd rather see that pro message 100 times a day then get a forced update at random times. Especially right before meetings.