this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
615 points (94.6% liked)

politics

25783 readers
2742 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

She’s embarked on a nationwide tour with Vermont’s Independent Senator Bernie Sanders, held town halls outside of her district in upstate New York, and raised $15 million

Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a progressive who has cemented her popularity with young voters, is reportedly considering running for president or the Senate in 2028.

Ocasio-Cortez, 35, made a splash when she was elected to represent New York’s 14th congressional district, located in the Bronx and Queens, in 2019. Now, the Democrat is reportedly considering taking the next step in her political career as the party searches for its next generation of leaders, Axios reported Friday.

Members of Ocasio-Cortez’s team have recently been positioning the progressive lawmaker, known as AOC, to either run for president or run for a Senate seat.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago (1 children)

“Plotting” is an infuriating word choice.

I’d vote for her. I’m not interested in entertaining any arguments about electability. The least electable person in the universe has won the presidency twice. If enough people vote for her she is electable.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

AOC concocts DEVIOUS scheme to repossess burger from McDonalds using PRIVATE bank account funding

[–] bss03 3 points 2 days ago

AOC buy lunch at McDonalds.

AOC funds animal murder with her own monies.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

" is reportedly considering running for president or the Senate in 2028."

Stupid clickbait title.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Good! I hope she comes with some fire, sound policy ideas, and a tight campaign

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Title is a lie. It says right in the body "president or Senate". Downvote and report.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also: "plotting"? What the fuck is this? Has running for president suddenly become illegal??

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

it's subconscious conservatism sneaking into the headline.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 157 points 4 days ago (4 children)

"Plotting"? Wtf is this wording?

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 94 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 12 points 3 days ago

I'm picturing that family guy skin shade card, but the top says "decisive executive leadership" while the bottom says "plotting/conspiring."

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, such dastardly plans.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 123 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Plotting, eh? How diabolical of her.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 107 points 4 days ago (4 children)

She'll have my vote. ...assuming there is actually a 2028 election. And that we're not extinct by then.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] grooveygroovester@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think both oligarchs and corporatists alike will fight far too hard to take her down. The US would need a far more fair and democratic procedure to elect someone that would change the paradigm like AOC--especially since Citizens United.

[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

But why is there such this defeatist attitude any time someone remotely not terrible tries to do something? It’s like we’re doing the fascists work for them with talk like this. I get that fuckery happens any time someone kinda different or kinda maybe good (for a politician) steps up, but that can be overcome with more support. When the margins are thin, it’s easy for them to cheat. When they aren’t, it’s fucking not. So let’s stop making the margins tighter with this kind of talk

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 48 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

If this is "plotting", then I am all for this "villain" to win. The wording of the headline implies that AOC is a bad thing, when we got...waves at orange fuckwit

Anyhow, if given the choice between AOC and Newsom, AOC all the way.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (7 children)

I've always interpreted it more as 'plotting a course'.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 58 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Usually it is said that someone is 'contemplating' or 'planning' a run for office, but since it's about a woman the headline says 'plotting' because that sounds underhanded and nefarious and the media wants to get the framing in place early.

That said, I think it would be better for her to run to replace Schumer in the Senate. A better chance to win and could do more good there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

She is one of only two people I would be excited to vote for.

The other person is Jon Stewart.

I want Dolly Parton.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago (4 children)

She needs to go for Chuck’s seat instead

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 66 points 4 days ago (6 children)

More likely she’s running for senate.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] dumples@midwest.social 16 points 3 days ago

I was very disappointed no Tim Walz in that list of other potential candidates. He was the best part of the Harris / Walz ticket

[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 45 points 4 days ago

Look if she comes out of the box swinging, and I mean haymakers both left and right, she could do it. The DNC has to have an honest to god real primary and not the horse shit they pulled with Bernie or the last-minute Harris takeover.

If AOC wins a primary and is nominated, hits the ground at a full sprint, doesn't pull punches on either side of the political spectrum, prays to Jah, and crosses her fingers she could do a Billy Clint or Obama. She is going to have to learn to play the Saxophone, confess to smoking weed and inhaling, slow jam the news, and probably host a full episode of SNL not just appear as herself in a sketch. If she did all that and she convinces Jesus to come down from on high and endorse her she has a 50/50 chance.

Oh, and she'll need a gun for her purse like that bargain bin Barbie from Colorado or the dude from Georgia's 14th congressional district.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Yes please if only for her age. I want old people out of power and I mean that across the entire spectrum including Bernie sanders. He would be great in her cabinet but we need young people FFS

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I feel like shit typing this but I'm afraid America will not vote for a woman, each time it's resulted in disaster.

Sure I'll vote for her, but frankly we need a sure thing, we got a lot of mess to fix, starting with shoring up our constitution against bad faith actors and arresting and prosecuting fascist criminals.

Disbanding the heritage foundation, impeach and remove supreme court justices, reverse citizens United, and remove voting rights of all those pardoned for J6.

Fox news should be made an example of with laws preventing their type of misinformation and propaganda and they should be destroyed.

Scientific fact will be the rule and the standard. Education and our core of government will be free from all religion. Any church or religious organizations in politics will be taxed and disqualified from government.

So many people need to face consequences and I hope you all have a list and are keeping score.

The gloves are fucking off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago

Whatever, I’ll wait for the official announcement. Love AOC but not getting my hopes up. Wait till there’s actual news.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Very quaint of them expecting an actual election to happen in 2028

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I like her. She can't win. Go for Senate.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

Any democrat who runs on a populist message that doesn't just pander to working Americans can win the presidency... just not the primary.

[–] berno@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

She won't win a run for POTUS. Try Senate first.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Here's to hoping AOC is another Mamdani during the primaries.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

IF there is something to run in 2028.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago

If AOC is the candidate, it will be the first time since Bernie that I will phone bank, knock down doors, canvas ...... Whatever it takes.

She is one of the few people in politics that I can get behind.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sigh.

Look. I like her. I like her fighting spirit. I like that she gives a shit. I like it all.

But when is this country going to learn? Look around you. Our culture is trash. This country is overflowing with racists and sexists and incels. Look at where we are right now.

We've tried to elect a woman twice in a row. They were both WAY more qualified than their opponent. And they lost. I voted for both of them.

If we run AOC, they'll run a white male bigot. And they'll win. Again. Using the same tactics.

Know your audience.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm not sure the racists and sexists and incels are gonna vote for the Democrat candidate even if it was a literal clone of Donald Trump, solely because it's the Democratic candidate

[–] nuggie_ss@lemmings.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

I'd vote for her in a heartbeat.

Probably one of the few candidates that have a chance with the democrats that would get me out to the polls.

If they nominate someone like kamala harris or joe biden again, it's all over.

This is of course assuming it's not all over already because they ran spineless crooks who don't represent the working class.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (13 children)

If they nominate someone like kamala harris or joe biden again, it's all over.

If they nominate someone like that, you should still go vote for that person and continue to fight for change, because the alternate is still far worse. The reality with US politics is that unless one of (or both) the two major parties implodes, the president will be affiliated with one of them. If one of the parties does break apart, it will guarantee a win for the other party.

If there is one thing the right does very well, it's to whip it's voters in line when election time comes. They may bitch and moan, but they'll vote for the (R) regardless.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›