theres only one party that thinks hunger is a political issue.
anti-science. anti-facts. anti-humanity
the regressive party strikes again
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
499 points (99.8% liked)
politics
25795 readers
2725 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yet they call themselves pro-life. They're pro-birth, but once you're born fuck you.
They love having more slaves
I think it was George Carlin that said they want live babies to grow up into dead soldiers.
Well, yeah - before you're born, they want you have a life; after, they tell you to get a life and quit whining. Sounds pretty "pro-life" to me!
(/s, because tone doesn't carry well in text)
Something something, "pro-life", something something. We've been here before, you all know how to fill in the blanks.
With blank checks to the causes that advance your own agenda?
.........what? Is that not what they do?
Pro-life doesn't extend beyond the womb.
^[Citation^ ^needed]^
Not if the faction that overwhelmingly calls itself "pro-life" is against feeding children once they're born. That's what it means when they decrease SNAP benefits and increase the administrative burden of accessing those (and related) resources.
Which is exactly what I mean.
My misunderstanding, thought it was a drive-by "nuh-uh" at first.
All good! And also I just saw my typo.
Just another hypocrisy from the far far far right.
Democrats haven't been so keen on addressing hunger. They refuse to address livable wages and keep bandaid solutions like food banks and charity.
True, but that kind of "both sides" is not helping. One side is hamstring by corporate donors and we need to primary the corpos out. The other side is actively taking food out of babies mouths, destroying public services, etc.
Both are issues, but one is truly heinous and cruel.
Can't vote your way out of fascism
That'll get rid of hunger the same way they stopped reporting COVID infections stopped COVID
Didn't researchers find that people getting repeated cases of COVID were seeing long term compounding issues with cognitive decline?
A.K.A. Repeated COVID cases equals more GOP voters created.
Yep, shaving off of up to three IQ points each time. More likely in cases of unvacinated infections.
They're cancelling it now because they expect food insecurity to get considerably worse in the next few years.
They're cancelling it now because they ~~expect~~ plan to make food insecurity to get considerably worse in the next few years.
It's almost like the largest employee in the country has had massive politically-motivated layoffs performed plus the entire economy upended with a slapdash constantly changing patchwork of import taxes on top of everything else currently at play to prevent economic growth
"We're not asking because we don't care what the answer is."
We know it's gonna be bad and we want to hide that
Oh. They do care.
Politicized by them
"I don't want to know about all the suffering I'm causing!"
I read "Annual Hunger..." and I thought it said Hunger Games for a moment and I WTFed at it.
But then again, we're not that far off from panem.
May the odds ever be in your favor...
Overly politicized? Whiskey tango foxtrot? How can FACTS about how many people aren't getting their basic needs be politicized? Wanting people to stay alive is political now? How are the clowns in the government this blatantly, cartoonishly evil? We're expected to respect "different opinions" when one side's "opinion" is some people don't deserve to live but they call themselves pro-life
Didn't you know? Reality has a liberal bias.
If it makes conservatives/ Republicans / Taco and their terrible ideology and policies look bad, that's "political".
Trickle down economics is just a golden shower on the poor. This final stage is from a gold plated child rapist that some worship as a sun god.
People are three days of meals away from revolution. Let's see how this strategy pans out, Cotton!
Gotta eat to live, gotta steal to eat. Otherwise we'd get along.
Reports are not just to confirm that good times are still good... They're for detecting and observing the bad times.
More conservative and Republican cancel culture.
So... Are there any independent watchdogs keeping track of all the damage he's doing? So that we can reverse this asap should we somehow manage to get someone at least milquetoast back in?
Honestly, I think it would be easier to just start over. There is a lot of systemic cruft from countless generations of ingrained politics and politicians, that have been strangling the possibility of effective reform. Until massive sea changes like getting rid of First Past the Post, Electoral College, and so forth has been done, things will just keep getting crappier.
well yeah. it should be politicized. if ur policy causes hunger ur a piece of shit, an enemy of the people and ur literally not doing ur job as a politician/party. Politicize that shit.
politics? Not here in politics town, says politics man.
It's like people who don't want chemicals in their food.
Everything is ~~chemicals~~ politics.
Politicized?
Politically inconvenient for the regime that cuts food aid, school meals, etc.