this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
385 points (96.8% liked)

memes

17365 readers
2480 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
385
submitted 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) by Bad@jlai.lu to c/memes@lemmy.world
 

[a creepy orange character smiles absent mindedly]

"Actually the guns exist to defend yourself against a tyrannical government" mfers when I ask them to actually defend us against the actual tyrannical government

https://thebad.website/comic/bro_left_freedom_on_read

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

the thing is that according to their view, what's currently happening isn't a "tyrannical government" but something they needed or something.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

Make no mistake the 2nd amendment people will be defending ICE and you will be staring down the barrel of their rifle if you fight back.

At this point the 2nd amendment is just a marketing tactic to convince more people to buy guns and they are currently leaning hard on groups who have not traditionally armed themselves.

After they are done arming both sides we can commit to civil war and they can finally purge the government of all dissenters. This is all part of their plan. So go buy more guns!

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 4 points 4 hours ago

It's virtue signalling. Every single accusation

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

Countries with armed citizens have more draconian and tyrannical states than those without.

[–] CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

I think most progressive gun owners I know are on crazy high alert worried mode and wondering about the next few years are going to go. I know spikes and shit will happen but political assassination is pretty prevalent these days. States are starting to sidestep the federal government.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 16 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

If I was going to stand by the 2nd amendment, this would be why. The problem is that weapons are too advanced now. Some dude’s AR-15 is not going to stop a tank.

The only thing the 2nd amendment does now is let people hunt and murder children at school.

[–] __hetz@sh.itjust.works 1 points 59 minutes ago

The 2A crowd opposed to the current regime isn't declaring war for the same reasons the people bold enough to cry out loud "please, now is the time to shoot these people" don't find the stones to do it themselves. Nobody wants to be the first. Nobody wants to risk winding up in a sting trying to recruit/join others. Nobody wants to go it alone and end up a crazed, lone gunman that maybe clips one head off the hydra before their own brains are splattered by a sniper team and their family is left with a closed casket and the shame of whatever propaganda gets cooked up to explain their actions. "He was a bad dude. A real bad guy. It has been said he had terabytes of transvestite furotica and a pet cat named Karl. He once took a picture of a rainbow. A disgusting man." Then, two weeks and two fresh heads later, the media cycle has moved on and the world is just a little worse than before.

It's not worth it if they're still comfortable. It's not even worth it if there's a sliver of hope to continue eking out a tolerably miserable existence - "at least I'm not dead." They'll carry on until there's a knock at their door then either go out in a hail of gunfire or hand over their arms and freedom because "False, indefinite imprisonment? At least I'm not dead."

That was mostly directed at OP, who is welcome to show us how it's done. To your own point - Years ago, and probably still, "tanks and drones" was a routine troll over on /k/ and the answer to it is always "Asymmetric Warfare." You don't go toe-to-toe and fist fight the wrecking ball swinging toward you. You blast the tracks off the crane. You hydrolock the engine. You make people too scared to sit in the operator's seat. Guerilla tactics, sabotage, etc.

You also don't police with military drones. You surveil and exact precision strikes. The second the American military launches missiles at Americans in America, we'll have that civil war that nobody with a brain actually wants. In our current political climate I genuinely believe that would kick things off. Point of no return, war were declared, hope you stockpiled canned goods and water because the supply chain is getting disrupted.

As for tanks, you can ruin the streets with them to stick them on the corners but it'll only be a show of force - an intimidation tactic. Tanks are rolling shields for infantry and other equipment, with a few bullet hoses and a big gun to blast encampments and other tanks. They also need those same foot soldiers, willing to kill their fellow citizens, to defend them from folks flinging molotovs or dropping DIY explosives down the barrel.

If you've got a water jug of pre-1982 pennies, that you haven't been bothered turning into pizza and beer or selling for the slightly higher scrap value, and you never stared at it and thought "I could smelt these down into cones because... I just really like the shape of cones," you're not trying hard enough to break the illusion that you're already defeated.

[–] VeryInterestingTable@jlai.lu 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

2nd amendment people thinking they have a chance against the US army. Maybe update the law so it is legal to own nuclear weapons so you can keep your government in check.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Arm the unions with missiles you say?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Lol, they are with the Army not against them.

[–] treesquid@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

This is the most ignorant shit. The AR-15 doesn't stop a tank. It's not supposed to stop a tank. When people are armed and everywhere, they can attack logistics everywhere. They can cut off fuel supply to that tank. They can prevent the crew from exciting that tank. They can take out the infantry that is supporting that tank and then plant a bomb on that blind-ass rolling bunker. Small arms are still enormously important in warfare and all you're proving is that you know absolutely nothing about warfare.

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago

Do you think the army that sends the tank does not kow how to create and defend a defend a supply line? Or that a single tank "guarded" by a few infanterists will come alone to be taken out by a bunch of rednecks with their toy guns? And good luck with planting your bomb on that " blind-ass rolling bunker". That was not that easy even in WWII. Nobody in their right mind will try that with a charge that actually might pierce a tank and your home made fire cracker is much more likely to blow you to bits than anything else. You won't even come close enough to a tank to even think about attaching anything to it, anyway. They're not meant to stand around as targets for high-school ninjas, they move. That's their one and only purpose - to keep the front line moving and to avoid frozen lines like in WWI. And. believe me, if a couple of tanks are moving somewhere near to you, you'll run for your life,. Not even an antitank missile will be of any use to you on short distance,

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You’re definitely not wrong. I’ll be the first to admit I don’t know about warfare. Hopefully I never have to truly find out.

I just mean government has drones and tanks and other super firepower that a normal citizen doesn’t have, but when the 2nd amendment was written, we were on a bit more of even footing.

Because of that, I would rather have more bans and restrictions to prevent American gun violence.

If we were still in more even footing, I would be much more hesitant to place restrictions.

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You’re definitely not wrong.

Yes, he is.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Maybe but he/she is not wrong that I don’t know shit about war. I’ll give them that much at least. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Yeah these dumb fucks are the same people who were saying "there's no way we can lose to a bunch of peasants in black pajamas" in the 1960s. Or who were saying the regime couldn't lose in România in the early 90s.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Some dude’s AR-15 is not going to stop a tank.

You don't use the AR-15 on the tank. You use it on the people involved in the logistics chain. If that tank doesn't have a driver, mechanics, fuel, spare parts, etc then the tank is useless. Insurgencies in far away lands didn't have this option but an insurgency at home certainly would.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Can you cite an actual example from real life?

The Vietnam fucking war??? What?

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

actual example from real life might be how the soviet russia defeated the nazi germans when the germans invaded.

they didn't kill the german soldiers directly, instead they stalled them, cut off their food supply and then basically waited 3 weeks for the german soldiers to either freeze to death or starve to death.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Ask the US military how effective the tanks were in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Vietnam.

You know, the last three wars the US has been in and totally not lost.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

As someone who would have agreed with you this time last year, my new AR-15 may not stop a tank, but it can slow down the anonymous gestapo if they try to abduct my neighbors and loved ones.

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Also, like, its really hard to fight insurgencies, even when they're going up against superior firepower.

[–] ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org 24 points 10 hours ago (9 children)

I also felt like the "I'd travel back in time and kill Nazis" crowd suddenly became waaay smaller after a modern Nazi got shot.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 14 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

One of the best responses to kirk's death said something like "This is like writing an obituary of Joseph Goebbels that goes 'Gobbels was a gifted marketer and father of six children'"

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I saw this one 2 days ago: r2nvQp1

[–] Bad@jlai.lu 7 points 8 hours ago

Hey I did this one a while ago!

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

His wife also did some postnatal abortion with his children in the last days of the Führer bunker. Pity the Goebbels.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 28 points 11 hours ago (7 children)

Tyranny's only something to fight when you're not on the same side as the tyrant.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, meanwhile, it's a volunteer service thought police out there. If you don't fawn over CK, you lose your job.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RedPandaRaider@feddit.org 14 points 11 hours ago

Be the change you want to see.

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Serious actually why leftists should've been gun owners and not pretending to stand on principle when they're actually afraid.

We, unfortunately, live in an equal parts armed and divided society. Ever expecting that the people who side with the tyrants on everything would use their guns to help you is so unbelievably naive.

If you don't own something now, you definitely should. The fed goons ain't gonna disarm themselves for your house specifically.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago

I bought guns when I was a conservative because I wanted to fight what I perceived as a tyrannical government.

I retain those same guns as a progressive because I fear the government has now become tyrannical and will need to fight it in my life time.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The crazy thing is that this lunacy has infected the left.

I guess that shit is just in the water here in the US. It's an article of faith that gun ownership as a prophylactic against State violence. Meanwhile, showing a cop your gun is a recognized form of suicide.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago

I guess that shit is just in the water here in the US.

The United States was founded with the help of private firearms and it's citizens have always distrusted and disliked their own Government. What you're talking about is literally baked into the fabric of our culture.

Meanwhile, showing a cop your gun is a recognized form of suicide.

Meh, it's all about where you are. I could wander around open carrying a firearm here in Wyoming and have little or no trouble. If I tried it in a liberal area of the country, for example Denver, I'd almost certainly have a problem.

It's all about the culture of the area.

load more comments
view more: next ›