this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
747 points (99.0% liked)

News

32233 readers
3515 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

I mean he probably got a promotion right? His bonus is gonna be so big this year!

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago

But if you make a mean comment about an open white nationalist Nazi who got 360 quickedscoped they want to dox your job. You can't make this reality up.

[–] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

Ofc he does. He said what all the right wing nutfucks think. Now they can say that part out loud, seeing that there were zero consequences for it.

Just throw it on the pile with all the other disgusting shit MAGAt morons do and say.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 18 points 7 hours ago

Classic "testing the waters" style vitriol.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 hours ago

They know how this works: wait a week for everyone to move on to the next thing. The only thing that has even slightly managed to defy this pattern is the epstein list, and even then it's still too early to tell.

[–] Naevermix@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Manufacturing consent.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 22 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Anyone on the left would have lost their job in a heartbeat.

It's time to stop holding those on the left to an entirely different, higher standard. It isn't working and it only gives the fascists more power. This country is absolutely pathetic right now. Time to start putting some feet down and holding the line.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

nO! tHe DeMocRaTs aRe PrO gENoCiDe!

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They are pro genocide, and also preferable to the alternative. Two things can be true.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world -4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

They are not pro genocide. They just understand nuance. You can be pro-Israel and anti-genocide. It requires mental capacity to also understand we can’t just abandon our ally because they have a shitty leader(s).

Should our allies abandon us because we elected Trump?

Purity tests are dangerous.

Do you really think Harris would be this hands off on Israel had she been elected?

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 hours ago

Democrats seem happy enough to abandon the the trans community. And UNWRA. Don't even need shitty leaders to be cut off.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I voted for Harris.
I think the rhetoric is different but the degree of permissiveness would be similar, yes.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

I guess we’ll never know.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Fired for thee, acceptable for me

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Charlie Kirk himself called for the execution of the president, nobody seemed to care about that either

[–] curious_dolphin@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Charlie Kirk himself called for the execution of the president, nobody seemed to care about that either

@mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca can you please link to a source for this? I gather Charlie Kirk had said many unsavory things, but this is the first I'm reading that he called for executing the president. I tried searching the internet, but the top articles I read did not mention anything about this (or if they did, I missed it).

For example, this article from thenation.com and this article from snopes.com.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 hours ago

Fox Und Fiends

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago

You fire Dowd because he made a very non-offensive offhand remark, which kind of turned out to be true, sure seems like he was a fan at one point, prior to making well reasoned point that a person who make a living fomenting political violence as a solution would unintentionally be on the receiving end of political violence from someone that shared his sentiment.

But hey, literally advocating for people to be killed due to being homeless and in need of mental health care, is perfectly fine.

SMH. Honestly the "Left" is absolutely pathetic in not pushing back and playing the damn game of Calvinball when the stakes are this freaking high.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

But if you or I get caught celebrating the death of right-wing influencers then we risk not only losing our jobs but also the weight of the federal government crashing down on us.

[–] AniZaeger@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The only thing I'm celebrating is that, for the first time in his life, Charlie Kirk finally leaned left. Maybe now he'll stop peddling that alt-right bullshit. Oh, wait... Too soon?

[–] ReHomed@lemmy.cafe 3 points 8 hours ago

It was never "too soon"

[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Can we "just kill" Brian kilmeade?

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Only if your name is Ade.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 4 points 9 hours ago

Foxes prefer their hens housed.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 35 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

~~Despite~~Because of his public call to “just kill” unhoused people, Brian Kilmeade continues to host “Fox & Friends.”

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You'd think he would get a promotion

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

Maybe he's interviewing to lead ICE

[–] WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world 17 points 18 hours ago

Hateful thoughts lead to hateful words which then lead to hateful actions.

Apologized aaaaand... Ya fired!

Just kill 'em

Nothing wrong here is there?

[–] Corelli_III@midwest.social 50 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

he's still on the air because he's a fascist on a fascist, pro-state news channel

the country is run by fascists

"despite"

the USA is a fascist empire this is normal in a fascist empire because this (a pogrom against the unhoused) is already occurring

for fucks sake outrage is very 2000-late, you're the fucking VOLK

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 89 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Someone should make a bot that responds to all of his socials with that clip for eternity.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

Challenge accepted

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 19 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It used to be that advertiser boycotts sometimes worked. They even worked on Fox News in the past. In 2009 all it took for a boycott against Glenn Beck was for him to say that Obama was racist. That resulted in a huge advertiser boycott, which then resulted in them cancelling his show. In 2017 advertisers pulled out of Bill O'Reilly's show, but it wasn't his hateful views that resulted in the boycott, it was the sexual misconduct allegations. Tucker Carlson's show was cancelled eventually too, there were some advertiser boycotts, but it really seemed like what hurt Fox was that they lost a defamation case that he caused and it cost them nearly $1 billion.

OTOH, often boycotts don't work. The boycott against Laura Ingraham didn't seem to work. Her show is still on the air. She was forced to apologize though. Jeanine Pirro was lightly punished with her attacks on Ilhan Omar, but her show was never cancelled. It stayed on the air until she became (and it's hard to believe this is real) the US Attorney for DC.

It seems like sometimes a loss of money works. But, it seems to work better if it's a defamation suit vs. an advertiser boycott. Still, an ad boycott might help.

Here are some lists of who advertises on Fox News:

https://whoadvertiseson.org/foxnews/

https://www.trueusa.org/boycott

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Fox News is able to survive advertisement boycotts more easily than other outlets because they charge a higher rate to cable providers to carry their channel. They know their viewership will sign up with the company that has their channel and not the competitor that doesn't. So all providers need to have it because their audience is huge. So they collect a larger percentage of their revenue from these companies than other channels do.and because of that, they don't need as much money from advertisers and can more easily absorb an advertiser boycott.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 hours ago

They also know that a lot of really old people have no idea what's on their cable bill and just pay when it arrives, even if they never watch Fox News.

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 73 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There’s no cancel culture for the piece of shit

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We've never been the target audience, so boycotting this dumpster doesn't really cancel anything. Their audience is fine with his rethoric.

[–] AniZaeger@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

As much as I like Michelle Obama, her idea of "when they go low, we go high" is really slitting is in the wrist right now. It really doesn't work when the low side's bar is non-existent. Personally, I've always been a fan of "when they go low, we curb stomp them out of existence".

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 2 points 7 hours ago

True, but they'll target others anyway. You're way to hard to influence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But Kirk or that United Health CEO or a politician or a business leader are all off the table. Calling for the killing of masses of undesirables is fine but don't dare suggest that for the people who decide to actually kill those masses.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago

I think to save the world, we should just kill Fox & Friends.

[–] waldo_was_here@piefed.social 8 points 18 hours ago

Is he on the list ?

[–] MisterCurtis@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think we should really put numbers to this and highlight the severity of his statement. According to numbers reported in The 2024 Annual Homelessness Assessment Report (AHAR) to Congress, he casually suggested killing around 771,480 people. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/pdf/2024-AHAR-Part-1.pdf

That's close to the population of Seattle. https://www.seattle.gov/opcd/population-and-demographics

Near the death toll of the American Civil War. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 3 points 9 hours ago

Brian would be perfectly happy killing the entire population of Seattle, as is.

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Disgusting this Nazi should have been fired on the spot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

cancel culture only goes one way it seems

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Can't make rent? Straight to lethal injection.

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Just kill 'em"

  • Brian Kilmeade
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›