this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
217 points (98.7% liked)

movies

1687 readers
437 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Renfield (2023) was a box office corpse—$65M budget, $26M gross—yet it’s a surprisingly fun splatter-comedy that deserved better.

Nicholas Hoult plays Renfield, Dracula’s eternally abused familiar. For centuries, he’s been the one covering up massacres, dragging corpses back to the lair, and nursing his master to health every time a vampire hunter gets lucky. The cycle never ends.

Now, he’s sneaking off to therapy groups, wondering if self-actualization is possible when your boss is the Prince of Darkness. That opening sequence even splices Hoult and Cage into footage from Dracula (1931), erasing Dwight Frye and Bela Lugosi as if Universal’s monsters had been quietly recast all along.

Of course, the main draw is Nicolas Cage. He isn’t just chewing scenery for the meme reels—he literally had his teeth shaved down so he could wear ultra-thin 3D-printed fangs and still enunciate through dialogue. Some prosthetic setups weighed twenty pounds, giving him a hulking, unnatural presence. His performance is theatrical, imperious, magnetic. The tragedy is that we don’t see nearly enough of him.

Hoult, though, is no slouch. His Renfield is a perfect blend of pained and pathetic, especially when he pops bugs for power. Those aren’t CGI snacks either—Hoult actually ate potato bugs, crickets, and caramel cockroaches on set. Director Chris McKay even joined him for solidarity, while Cage—who once swallowed live roaches in Vampire’s Kiss—declined this time. The running gag works because Hoult sells both the disgust and the absurdity.

The side cast adds texture. Shohreh Aghdashloo commands the screen as a crime boss in New Orleans, and Ben Schwartz revels in playing her inept, whiny son. Awkwafina, unfortunately, is stranded in the role of a hard-boiled cop—it’s a part that never quite fits her comic timing or voice.

What really makes the movie tick are the fight scenes. McKay insisted on gallons of practical blood—enough to paint half of Bourbon Street—and it pays off. Limbs fly, torsos burst, and the choreography gleefully turns gore into slapstick weapons. Even behind the camera, chaos spilled into real life: during production, more than twenty crew cars were broken into, a touch of crime mirroring the crime family on screen.

Renfield wasn’t the launchpad Universal wanted for its “Monsterverse.” Opening against Mario, John Wick 4, and The Pope’s Exorcist sealed its fate. But what survives is a film that reframes Dracula as a toxic boss and Renfield as a burnt-out employee desperate for freedom.

For that alone, it’s worth watching. And as long as Nicolas Cage keeps sinking his fangs into projects like this, I’ll keep showing up.

Where to watch:

Netflix: https://www.netflix.com/title/81642086

@movies@piefed.social

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the_artic_one@programming.dev 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What I love about Cage's performance in this movie is that he's not just playing Dracula, he's playing Bela Lugosi playing Dracula.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

It really serves nicely as a legacy sequel to the Universal horrors. I’d love to see a similar approach taken with Frankenstein.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago

My experience with this film was overwhelmingly positive but cut the other way.

What I saw was a deliberate and not-at-all veiled allegory for classic narcissistic abuse, its victims, and how victimhood can be self-perpetuating until you get help and break free. I would go as far as to say that it's both affirming, supportive, and informative to that end. There's even a not-so-subtle explanation as to why you don't see group therapy for this sort of thing (it's on purpose and absolutely necessary).

Everything else is fun acting, action scenes, special effects, set dressing, homage to old horror films, you name it, it's in here. It all serves the story's core premise brilliantly and keeps an otherwise dreadful topic - perhaps all to real for some of the audience - palatable for the film's runtime.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 10 points 7 hours ago

Movie was non stop hilarity. Nick was doing w/e that was. he felt so out of place but it worked. Benjamin Joseph Schwartz nailed his role and Hoult was perfect. Only problem was it was a bit too excessive with the gore. I thought it added to movie absurdity but others disagreed with me.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago
[–] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago

Good movie. Worst part: Awkwafina is in it.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I will watch absolutely anything with either Hoult or Cage in it. I thought Renfield was fantastic, and genuinely had no idea it performed that poorly sales-wise.

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago

Truly hope it picks up cult status. It's such a good movie.

[–] Okokimup@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago

Idk how people saw Nic Cage as Dracula and didnt fall all over themselves grabbing tickets. That shit is golden.

[–] razzazzika@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I wanted to see that but missed it in the theatwrs... i got the video game though. Not too many movies make video game tie ins like they did in the early 2000's, so I felt it was novel.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't know about the game. Is it any good?

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] razzazzika@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago

It's alright. It's really just a wannabe vampire survivors like game.

[–] kepix@lemmy.world -5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

awkwafina is fuckin the right producers, but she kills the vibe in seconds

[–] atomicpoet@piefed.social 8 points 8 hours ago

This is a warning. Be mindful of Rule #1. Dial back casual misogyny.

[–] B0NK3RS@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

I'm a little surprised because it's a really good movie and Cage and Hoult fit perfectly in their roles.

The success of a movie being measured at the box office is so outdated. With the cost of going to the movies what it is, I won’t go for 99% of movies, unless it’s something to justify the big screen and sound. Renfield looked good but it was one of those “I’ll wait till it’s streaming” movies and not one I needed to rush to the theatre and spend $50 for

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's a moment in the trailer where the support-group leader is casually inviting Dracula into the room, and Renfield panics as he's realizes what's happening. As soon as I saw that, I knew I needed to see this movie. 10/10 did not disappoint. Nick Cage as Dracula is just perfectly cast for the intended tone.

[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's quite a fun movie. Cage as Dracula is priceless.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago

Yeah it was not super awesome or anything but you come away having been entertained.

[–] viking 1 points 16 hours ago

Agree it was pretty fun, but I can see how it appeals neither to the typical Nick Cage fan, nor horror enthusiasts.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Hoult is a treasure

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

I think it was the marketing. I had never heard of it when it popped up buried in new releases on a streaming service. Based on this I assumed it'd be shit but something in me was excited to see Cage as a vampire. Glad I did; 8/10 for me.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago

lol I liked that movie.

[–] HelluvaKick@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I liked it, but man the narration gets a little grating and just turns all the subtext into text

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago

I don't really remember it being advertised much. And the few folks I know who saw it weren't familiar with Nic Cage's less mainstream action flick work so they were really thrown by his character.

[–] Corelli_III@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago

the problem isn't that it was bad, the problem was that it was mid