this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
487 points (87.9% liked)

Technology

75191 readers
2533 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

archive.is link to article from allabout.ai at https://www.allaboutai.com/resources/ai-statistics/ai-environment/

(page 3) 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

This is my main issue with it. I think its useful enough but only if it uses about the same energy as you would use doing whatever without it. Most conversations I had with someone trying to convince me it does not use to much power end up being very much like crypto ones were it keeps on being apples to oranges and the energy consumption seems to much. Im hoping hardware can be made to get the power use lower the way graphics cards did. I want to see querying an llm using about the same as searching for the answer or lower.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Generating bullshit that isn't really that useful.

Remember when the Apple Newton "revolutionized" computing with handwriting recognition?

No, of course not, because the whole thing sucked and vanished outside of old Doonesbury cartoons. LOL

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

A lot of these studies they list are already years outdated and irrelevant. The models are much more efficient now, and it’s mainly the Musk owned AI data centers that are high pollution. Most of the pollution from the majority of data centers is not from AI, but other use.

The old room-sized ENIAC computers used 150-200 kW of power, and couldn’t do even a fraction of what your smart phone can do. The anti-AI people are taking advantage of most people’s ignorance, intentionally using outdated studies, and implying that the power usage will continue to grow- when in fact it has already shrunk dramatically.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shame to see this clickbait blog misinfo here, but the anti-ai sloppers wont let that stop them.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -5 points 1 day ago (6 children)

As soon as you see water consumption being called an issue you know it’s not to be taken seriously. Water doesn’t just disappear.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›