this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
22 points (92.3% liked)

Opensource

3895 readers
56 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MoreZombies@piefed.au 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It looks like less of a call for actual feedback and more a call for positive reinforcement for their decision to be on there.

[–] Lazycog@sopuli.xyz 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

And they are only answering the easy questions in that thread, just basically answering those "yes" answers with "but but but...you are wrong". When someone elaborates further or presents some good arguments they just stop answering.

I'm happy I moved to CoMaps when the shitty behaviour of OrganicMaps shareholders came into light.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 34 points 1 day ago

You should edit the post title to say "on GitHub" instead of whatever is currently going on there.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

TIL CoMaps is on codeberg

[–] illusionist@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm not a user. But in my opinion, it is more important to be seen as a small project than blindly following foss. Maintaining two repos is a lot of work.

I also use as much foss as possible, no facebook, etc. but if the added benefit is large enough, one should do it. I'd much rather have an osm app with a billion users on github than a thousand on codeberg.