this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
217 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25651 readers
2300 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Aurora, IL

I am also told that at least one fire station had kept their flag lowered, and locked it in place, requiring the fire chief to come cut the lock. Also that there are people sneaking around lowering flags.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars 111 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

He (Kirk) is just not that important of an individual to merit this kind of national response. It’s not on the level of the September 11 attacks. It’s simply not. And, I would argue it further divides Americans than unites us.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He wasn't a politician, head of state, particularly well known, or unanimously loved person. The only person he represented was himself. Objectively speaking, There's no reason to lower the flag for him.

[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 66 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly, lowering the flag for him cheapens lowering the flag altogether.

It just doesn’t mean what it used to. This is when it changed.

[–] henfredemars 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's insulting. Regardless of your feelings on Kirk, this was hardly an attack on the whole of America. It was yet another school shooting. We have quite a few of those.

[–] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Arguably, a school shooting with only one victim is progress? I didn't quickly find statistics on average deaths per incident, but did see that there is over 1 incident per week average since 2021.

[–] henfredemars 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not every victim of a shooting dies from the injuries. I would argue one whole death is in the realm of shooting event deaths even with multiple victims.

[–] neoman4426@fedia.io 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Speaking of September 11, remember that Donald's response to the attacks, on the day they happened, was to do an interview where he bragged about how they made a building of his the tallest in the neighborhood. And as always with him, it was a lie as there were several taller buildings nearby.

[–] henfredemars 7 points 1 day ago

That's really gross. I had no idea he was so callous.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I sorta love it. Everyone who treats him with empathy is basically shitting over everything he said and stood for. Its an awesome catch 22.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

everything he said and stood for

Charlie Kirk stood for nothing besides Charlie Kirk. Kirk was a lying grifter. He would have loved everyone treating him with empathy, because he didn't ever actually care about empathy generally; he cared about hurting other people to his own benefit, and that meant eliminating empathy towards them.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well I mean taking his words at face value. Either you should shrug your shoulders and say thats what he gets and his kids have learned something. That would be following the charlie kirk preaching. Or you say its horrible and express feelings he would deride for anyone else. So charlie kirk would not be empathetic to charlie kirk if he was not charlie kirk.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know exactly what you mean. I just don't want people to lose sight of the fact that Charlie Kirk had no actual principles in any capacity. He said and did whatever helped him in that specific moment.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah I just bring it up because it makes me feel a bit better to see the lowered flags and such. Its like they are giving him the middle finger.

I say something about Charlie every time I see one. It's become a game for my friend group.

They aren't kind things, but that's only because he wasn't a kind man.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At first I thought you were referring to the Mayor. After reading the article, and re-reading your comment, I now get you were talking about Kirk. Suffice it to say, I was confused. 😅

[–] henfredemars 5 points 1 day ago

I edited my comment to enhance clarity without changing the meaning.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Most everyone, when he was shot, was like: "Kirk who?"

He's just a podcaster with some followers.

I just don't get how this jamoke is more important than Carter? Or Melissa Hortman, FFS?

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

In such a perspective everybody is educated to become a hero. In every mythology the hero is an exceptional being, but in Ur-Fascist ideology, heroism is the norm. This cult of heroism is strictly linked with the cult of death. It is not by chance that a motto of the Falangists was Viva la Muerte (in English it should be translated as “Long Live Death!”). In non-fascist societies, the lay public is told that death is unpleasant but must be faced with dignity; believers are told that it is the painful way to reach a supernatural happiness. By contrast, the Ur-Fascist hero craves heroic death, advertised as the best reward for a heroic life. The Ur-Fascist hero is impatient to die. In his impatience, he more frequently sends other people to death.

He was a general of the fascist vanguard and died while fighting. Therefore he is a hero and a martyr. Hortman and Carter were enemies of the party, and therefore deserving of the celebration and laughter at their deaths.

Hypocrisy and double standards are hallmarks of rightists.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

He was a state-supported Christofascist propagandist. He was important because he amplified the white nationalist hatred MAGA wants.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Or the kid that died due to a school shooting that happened on the same day.

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH 29 points 1 day ago

One good thing that comes with the half mast flags is that it reminded me every time I saw them that Kirk was dead and it made me happy

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 12 points 1 day ago

And I'd bet that before this many of these people only knew Charlie Kirk as a name in passing if at all, probably couldn't tell you where he stood on topics. But he's become a convenient martyr for MAGA, so therefore this is a hill the want to fight on. If we had anyone important to society in any way be laid in state at the Capital or flag lowered, it would be a daily thing with a backlog and the flag would stay down. Charlie wasn't even that level of important, he was one of many of the current Gish galloping con men pushing an agenda for money, celeb status, and maybe power if they were good enough.

[–] derry@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks for clarifying, glad hear it's the one in my state, no need to lower the flag for fascists

I hate Illinois Nazis