this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
228 points (98.3% liked)

Cyanide & Happiness

808 readers
132 users here now

About

Hello fellow Cyanide and Happiness fans!

Cyanide & Happiness (C&H) is a webcomic created by Rob DenBleyker, Kris Wilson, Dave McElfatrick and Matt Melvin. The comic has been running since 2005 and is published on the website explosm.net along with animated shorts in the same style. Matt Melvin left C&H in 2014, and several other people have contributed to the comic and to the animated shorts

Read more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyanide_%26_Happiness

Hope you enjoy and feel free to contribute to the community with art, media, cool stuff about the authors, tattoos, toys and anything else, as long it’s Cyanide & Happiness related!

History

@MrSebSin@sh.itjust.works started this community and wrote:

About this community and how I post the comics… Many moons ago, I would ask my Dad to save the newspaper for me everyday so I could read my favorite comic strips. Of course these days you can read your favorite comics online instead of a newspaper, but I love the nostalgia of reading the daily comics. Anyway, one of my favorite current comics is Cyanide and Happiness and I will be posting the daily release from their website (https://explosm.net/) and a an extra or two randoms.

Related Communities

Subscribe to all the daily comic communities!

Fine Print

All comics posted are freely available online. In no way is the poster claiming ownership, copyright or anything else. This is a not for profit community, we just want to enjoy our comics, thank you.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The amount of money in his wallet is irrelevant to the underlying moral question.

[–] Idreamofcheesy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The question being: Is property inherently more valuable than a human life?

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The question is are you justified to use deadly force, if somebody threatens you with a deadly weapon.

I think that in most jurisdictions, it wouldn't be legal to take someone's gun and then shoot them with it. Once they'd been disarmed, they may no longer pose a threat. However, if you pulled out your own gun and shot them, this would be self defense, as they were still a threat when you attacked.

Morally, I think many religions claim they're objective and say that killing is wrong. However, they often carve out exceptions.

My own subjective morality in this case would agree that this is immoral, as the robber has been disarmed. However, its impossible to be sure they're really no longer a threat.

However however however.

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

No, nothing has any inherent value, we are the ones who assign value.

[–] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That's an easy one.

[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 21 points 2 days ago

But it really does highlight the moral in question better when it's a small amount.

[–] ProvableGecko@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Can't tell if leftist or libertarian

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think the joke is that he risked his life for 6 bucks. Not that poor people deserve to die ...

[–] MrSmith@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I think "the joke" is that people in the US will use their gun for "self-defence", even if all they have to defend is 6 bucks.

Sort of like that kid, that I don't remember the name of, who drove miles with an assault rifle to "defend" himself.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Who drove miles and across state lines

FTFY

You don't need his name. He doesn't deserve to be remembered.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, I didn't think of it from that angle, that's good!

[–] Karjalan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's both really

Stupid to risk your life over, insane to murder someone over

[–] Actionschnils@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

And calling yoursslf a hero for it

And the subtext to that is β€œLife is cheap” to some people.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Guess people have an inalienable right to assault me because I'm poor. I'll try to keep that in mind going forward πŸ™

[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago

It's the "I'm a hero!" at the end of the comic that sets the tone for what this is about.

By celebrating his act, self defense guy is showing that he specifically enjoyed it enough to celebrate his act afterwards. It's the difference between killing someone in self defense and killing someone in self defense then teabagging the corpse. Only one of these situations demonstrates a completely lack of empathy.

So, to address your comment directly, this isn't a comment about self defense and all its myriad variations. It's about the celebration of loss of life that happens whenever these situations come up.