this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
356 points (96.4% liked)

Political Memes

9453 readers
2727 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Christ on a cracker, the context makes it even worse!

[30 comments in this is probably not an original comment anymore, but I had to write it out]

FWIW, I work with children, and I see every day that empathy is a learned skill. Usually learned at the same time they learn socialising with other kids. This person was probably failed by all adults around him in childhood. By the system. But that doesn't excuse going on social media and whipping the masses into a hateful frenzy.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Isn't Christ THE cracker? Wouldn't Christ on a cracker be two crackers?

I found Cheesus Christ on a Cracker

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So he had neither empathy nor sympathy...

[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Damn, somehow it's even worse with the full context.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Wait till you see the one about gun deaths and he reduces human life down to a statistic. As america spirals into authoritarianism with no recourse from the 2nd amendment defenders. At least cars do what they purport to do.

Everyday I consent to get in my car. I do not consent, to say, getting shot in a public location, like maybe, a university campus.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Everyday I consent to get in my car. I do not consent, to say, getting shot in a public location

I get that your main point is to debunk this guy's defence of guns, and that's a worthy goal, but this is motornormative bullshit. Cars kill thousands of people who gave no such consent, like pedestrians and cyclists. The analogy doesn't even line up properly. A more apt analogy would be to compare consenting to carrying a gun yourself being equivalent of consenting to get in your car.

And even that implies that you really did give full and uncoerced consent with viable alternative options. Which, if you live in a typical car-dependent American (or Canadian, Australian, etc.) city, you did not. Because your city lacks adequate public transport options, lacks safe cycling infrastructure, and things are too far apart to walk in a reasonable time. !fuckcars@lemmy.world

Guns are also bad and anyone who thinks America doesn't need radical change in gun culture and gun laws is fucking insane. But don't let that fact be a reason to also defend motornormativity.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

Wow, all those armed guards are really good at hiding because I never see them. I feel much safer now

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sorry to nitpick, but technically not a psychopath but a sociopath.

A psychopath recognizes that things like empathy and integrity and morality exist, and just doesn't care. A sociopath (like, by his own admission, both Kirk and the linked poster) doesn't even understand what they are or believe that they exist.

Aside from that - yes - it's deliciously ironic that the linked poster apparently sincerely believes that the context somehow makes it better, rather than, as it actually does, simply driving home the point that Kirk was a sociopath.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Im not convinced he didnt know empathy existed. I believe he uses these weak cliches as a piffy jumping off point while "debating." Sure, no one can feel the exact same way as someone but thats not what empathy means. I believe Charlie knew that but instead of conceding the point he would use appeals like this to get suggestable people to deny the reality of empathy.

He demonstrates this by admiting he knows the meaning of the word sympathy and how it is different from empathy.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just fyi, I think you might mean “pithy” unless you were going for an onomatopoeia

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mmm... yeah. I think you have a point here.

And on reflection, I don't know what possessed me to believe that Kirk was honestly relating his view on the matter.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Well sociopath or psychopath, we can both agree he was not mentally well.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

Exactly. The whole "just debating" thing is a load of wank. It's just a way to frame manipulative ideological recruitment.

Why was he going to universities to "just debate" ? Obviously, the purpose was to recruit supporters for his kooky agenda.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Psychopaths are perfectly capable of not knowing empathy is real, especially as they have never felt it. Sociopaths lack the kind of impulse control that Kirk regularly demonstrated and he also had a massive ego and an 'im Better than you' mentality that fits psychopathy much more than sociopathy. Kirk was more than likely a psychopath or extreme narcissist.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

Tell me you've never looked up these two words before without telling me bruh wtf, they aren't synonyms, they mean different things lmfao rest in dirt.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Empathy means you realise that you are fundamentally the same as someone else, sympathy comes from a position of power. It's a performance where you are pretending that you are feeling something so you don't appear as a psychopath.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think sympathy can be something you can try and understand but not fully grasp. I can TRY and understand why women are emotional during menstruation, but will I ever KNOW what that feels like? No I won't.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can you really not see what it's like? When I see how someone is reacting, I can understand and almost feel what they are experiencing, even if I don't experience it myself. Humans are pretty standard and come with common emotions and feelings.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Well, maybe it's my education on the subject. A women's hormonal cycle is completely different than a male's. Males have a 24 hour cycle and women can fluctuate depending on their cycle. So just with that alone I know their emotional system is run on a different hardware. I am not sure how I can relate much.

I have two sisters and listened, but do I know what it's like to feel like that? Nope.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Its not a performance.... its a neurological function of your brain.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you don't have empathy, I don't see how it's possible to have genuine sympathy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

Ok. Hear me out.

We lock the doors of cpac after lacing the water with mdma.

Afterwards we let them out. Those that survived will know empathy, the rest … well good riddance I suppose.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I guarantee he isn't feeling anything now.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 7 points 2 days ago

Pretty sure he felt a split second of surprise.

[–] quacky@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago

that second half is a philosophy of mind and is nontrivial. But I'm sure there is evidence out there of people geniunely experiencing pain or negative emotion when contronted with expressions of the negative emotions / pain

[–] 0ndead 10 points 2 days ago

This is where I get to say “Fuck your feelings”

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›