this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
139 points (93.2% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1465 readers
129 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/35891683

I have changed the original title of this post, as it is imo, thanks largely to discussion in this thread, with a lemmyusa mod, unnecessarily incendiary.

Original Title:

"lemmyusa.com is engaging in vote manipulation, suggest defederating unless it is addressed"

Mod Abuse:

https://lemmy.world/modlog/1432313?page=1&actionType=All

The instance has 3 active subs, it's unlikely the admins are not also the mods engaging in this.

Banning anyone who downvotes is a clear attempt to foster a chilling effect on dissenting opinions. The mods and admins of this instance are putting their thumb on the scales in order to make their ideas appear more positively received than they actually are.

Thanks for your attention to this.


I realize that doing a cross post here is... unorthodox, and this doesn't drectly involve my own interactions, and I am technically breaking a number of the rules of this comm...

... but I think this is worth the discussion and consideration of, and potential further investigation from this comm, which essentially functions as a de facto place for discussing things like this.


Further context / info I have been able to gather:

Here is a direct link to their own modlog.

https://lemmyusa.com/modlog

Their dedicated legal page:

https://lemmyusa.com/legal

Their described 'sidebar rules' appear to only be:

We're keeping it simple:

Be thoughtful, act responsibly, and treat others with respect.

No NSFW content.

Everything else seems to be in the Legal / TOS / Privacy Policy section.

My preliminary, most charitable interpretation of mod/admin activity here... is that they can and will essentially ban anyone who posts on their instance and is not a lemmyusa user, as any other user would not have agreed to their TOS.

???


Further, this instance appears to be hosting an account that is impersonating SatansMaggotyCumFart, a fairly well known, mostly parody/dedicated 'bit' account here on lemmy...

The profile description of their version of SMCF claims to be 'the only real profile!', and is using a clearly AI generated avatar/profile pic... and uh, to me at least, it seems very unlikely this is the actual SMCF.


UPDATE:


Ok.

After some conversation in this thread, I should add:

There is, and there was at the time this all started, a rule in the comm that much of these downvote bans took place in, which reads:

'No Serial Downvoting.'

Personally, I find this rather vague.

How many dowmvotes, in what timeframe, across how many comms/comments/posts, etc?

I am also still uncertain to what extent these actually are dedicated, persistent, serial downvoters, vs just a whole lot of randos seeing something on their feed and then downvoting it and moving on.

I get the intent behind trying to stem a mass wave of negativity, nobody likes a wave of mass downvotes and hostile comments...

But on the other hand, there should probably be a bit more clarity and specificity here, less heavy handed actions for less comitted and persistent behavior.

IMO, a balance has to be struck between allowing people to genuienly freely express their opinion via downvoting, but at the same time, there are clearly also cases where people or groups of people basically just downvote all comments or posts from a specific user or in a certain comm or pertaining to a certain topic, etc.

I myself am fairly confident I have managed to attract at least one person who downvotes all my posts/comments on their instance, simply because I am on their shitlist, apparently.

So ideally... we could maybe have a constructive conversation about that.


As to the SatansMaggotyCumFart profile on lemmyusa being an impersonatory account:

We've got one mod from lemmyusa here saying he really isn't sure, and personally blocked him, I think from his own user standpoint, not from the standpoint of himself as a mod.

IMO, the account still strikes me as likely another person, impersonating the actual user... I of course cannot be certain, but the profile still strikes me as very sus.


Finally, I am least personally going to strongly discourage any one reading this from popping in to lemmyusa and going out of your way to downvote every single thing on there simply because it is on that instance.

They are already in more or less lockdown mode, call that a win if you must.

I did not intend nor do I want this very post to act as an attack vector.


UPDATE 2


SatansMaggotyCumFart, the real one, has appeared in this thread and confirmed that the lemmyusa profile is indeed an impersonation, is not them.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

!conservative2@feddit.org too

They have someone impersonating/mocking me promoting conservative comms: @QuantumTickler@lemmy.myserv.one

I certainly wish they'd stop.

[–] TheSilentNickel@feddit.org -3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

gosh, lots of drama in this post and the other post about me. Sorry if i bored u guys. I'm still gonna keep banning for serial downvting. Sorry it caused so much drama, but i'm going to stick to what I was doing even tho there were some good conversations here. I just wanted to put this out to you all in case I get banned here.

Some people made fun of me for my typing: No excuses but from slight brain injury and missing finger (both issues from car accident when i was little) but i'll take more time to type better. Dont feel sorry for me, just wanted you to know im not as bad off as i type. haha I ain't got nothing to complain about and i'm inspired to type better now. My thinking is ok, just motor movement is skippy is all.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 27 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Okay, so this is clearly a MAGA instance. But why did they tag it as conservative2? There's not even a "conservative" on lemmyusa.com

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

There are a number of ( lemmy ) instances that have a 'conservative' comm.

At one point, one of those was run by a genuine conservative mod... but they then abandoned it.

Then another person... it may possibly have been SMCF, but I am not sure about that... took it over and then ran it as a parody of itself, for a bit.

Then a 'conservative2' popped up as another 'genuine' comm.

All the above is my best vague recollection and should not be considered highly accurate.

Nonetheless... if something actually did play out along those lines... this fits the reddit style MO of meta-drama based naming conventions.

It would also fit with the general online right wing agitator MO of intentionally sewing confusion as to who is who and what is what.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The main role of a moderator of a small community is to grow that community, be that providing content, or weeding out any negative influences on participation. A safe space for whatever the community is about.

Drive by voting usually is neutral with the +/- cancelling out, but for niche topics the drivebys can have a impactful chilling effect on the actual community growth and participation, so its reasonable for the moderator to remove negative drivebys from the community. (For now, until subscriber only communities becomes a federated standard in lemmy 1.0)

I've written in more detail on this philosophy here

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Briefly skimming that... one idea that comes to mind would be if maybe users have more ability to fine tune but also customize not just one 'feed', but many.

Like different playlists for spotify kinda.

Don't just have comms I'm subbed to.

Let me sub, but also, let me as a user, sub to it, and put it in my minifeed that i name... politics, or news, or tech stuff, or, happy animal pictures, or whatever.

Afaik, you could do that all clientside, maybe not in lemmy itself, but certainly via a frontend app or some other kind of way of viewing lemmy.

You can do what I just described with NewPipe, for youtube viewing without ads.

So this way, instead of 'all' 'local' and 'subs', you have like 'custom subgroup of subs 1, 2, 3, etc'.

Having that paradigm on its own may significantly alter the perspective of the average user toward 'i am responsible for the kind of stuff i see' and thus take a more active role in curating their own content, as opposed to just expecting someone else to do that for me, and complaining/lashing out when i see things that i dont like.

[–] Blaze@lazysoci.al 7 points 1 day ago

PieFed has that, it's called personal feeds

https://anarchist.nexus/ is a PieFed instance associated with your instance, dbzer0

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Like different playlists for spotify kinda.

That is a really great idea! Multiple feeds depending on your mood

Let me sub, but also, let me as a user, sub to it, and put it in my minifeed that i name… politics, or news, or tech stuff, or, happy animal pictures, or whatever.

piefed kinda has that with topics

You can do what I just described with NewPipe, for youtube viewing without ads.

And freetube!

Having that paradigm on its own may significantly alter the perspective of the average user toward ‘i am responsible for the kind of stuff i see’ and thus take a more active role in curating their own content, as opposed to just expecting someone else to do that for me, and complaining/lashing out when i see things that i dont like.

Or have clients suggest an auto-block for communities the user persistently finds disagreeable.

[–] Blaze@lazysoci.al 3 points 1 day ago

piefed kinda has that with topics

Personal feeds too

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Glad you agree the broad concept is a good idea!

I would be... wary though, of auto suggesting blocks.

At this point... I don't think I at all trust any kind of algorithm influencing how a user experiences 'social media' or 'a mass of randos posting any and everything'.

I am very much of the mindset that the system needs to teach the user that the user is responsible for themselves.

Give them tools to manage that, show them how to use them, but do not influence their actual tastes in any way.

... we have to stop putting the training wheels on everything, the result of doing that for 2 decades is gen Z doesn't know what a file in a directory is, gen a is basically illiterate.

we have to tell people to think for themselves.

...

edit

ah. i had a knee jerk reaction.

you meant an auto block thingy that is entirely local to the user.

... ok, that seems more sensible.

... you can see though that at this point i basically view algorithmic manipulation of content to be evil black magic, lol.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 18 points 2 days ago (7 children)

In my mind it's pretty simple.

  1. Federating or not with a MAGA instance needs to be on the basis of issues a hell of a lot more impactful than any kind of Lemmy voting misdemeanor or anything.
  2. I actually think that keeping open lines of communications with people under certain authoritarian structures does more to tear them down than any amount of "isolating" them can. It's why I don't have a problem with engaging on lemmy.ml for example. If people can never hear the counterpoint, then it's that much easier for them to continue the mental picture of whatever horribly skewed strawman counterpoint their overlords are telling them is the counterpoint. I don't think defederating from lemmyusa to "punish" them for being MAGA is the way to do it.
  3. I do think if they're going off instance and being obnoxious, then just booting them is probably the answer. No one's required to degrade their own Lemmy experience for the sake of these folks.

They're always going to be able to manipulate things on their own instance to try to interfere with strategy number 2 above. Lemmy.ml does this, presumably lemmyusa would do the same, just banning anyone from off instance that for whatever reason tries to engage with sensible stuff. But they can't ever do a perfect job at it, and I don't think other instances should be assisting them be pre-emptively shutting off that line of communication.

That is my 2c

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›