this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
607 points (100.0% liked)

WomensStuff

624 readers
272 users here now

Women only trans inclusive This is an inclusive community for all things women. Whether you're here for make up tips, feminism or just friendly chit chat, we've got you covered.

Rules…

  1. Women only… trans women are women, and transphobic or gender critical talk isn’t allowed. Anyone under the trans umbrella (e.g. non-binary, bigender, agender) is free to decide whether a women's community is a good fit for them.
  2. Don’t be a dick. No personal attacks, no aggression, play nice.
  3. Don’t hate on groups, hatefilled talk about groups is not allowed. Ever.
  4. No governmental politics, so no talk of Trump actions etc. We recommend Feminism@beehaw.org for that, but here is an escape from it.
  5. New accounts or users with few comments may have their posts removed to prevent spam and bad-faith participation.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Is it clear?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 8 points 2 days ago

Also, if she SHOULD mean yes but says no she doesn't deserve it, for bad communication skills.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I knew a girl who said I wasn’t a man if I took no for an answer. She ended up raping me and giving me a disease but as a victim there was nothing I could do.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 8 points 2 days ago

Cool story, bro. One that totally happened, I'm sure. Maybe you should share it in a group where your posting isn't explicitly against the rules?

[–] zanyllama52 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Everyone deserves to be heard, especially when they so "no".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 48 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Every piece of love advice I received as a kid in the 90s and 00s was equivalent to "try harder" or "pursue" or "don't give up" and they made it sound so good. My poor wife... The early years couldn't have been easy for her.

[–] LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hey Quantum thanks for your perspective! We're a trans inclusive women only community so please dont comment again thanks for understanding 😊

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Are you sure they're not trans?

[–] QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm not. Blocking the community.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 4 points 2 days ago

I'm sure you'll be missed greatly. Everybody misses people who casually break the rules and then get pissed off when politely asked to abide by them. Their contributions would undoubtedly have been completely and utterly priceless.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

For enforcing the rules? Seems a little harsh

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You're not alone. Same. My wife is wonderful and I'm glad she challenged me to question some of my behaviors.

[–] LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hey Alec thanks so much for stopping by! We're trans inclusive women only so please don't comment again and have a lovely weekend

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Hey I'm a woman, why do you feel the need to say trans inclusive, and not just "women only" this is my first time discovering this instance. And it comes off as performative although I see you're drawing a line in the sand between you and the terfs-- but imo you're just acknowledging the existence of terfs more than validating trans women.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't think it's a useful strategy to not acknowledge the existence of terfs or trans people. In a lot of similar communities there is always the question of whether trans people are actually included or not, and even if so, who under the trans spectrum, which always makes me uncertain about my place.

And also, just ignoring problems such as terfs is not a solution. They exist whether their existence is acknowledged or not, sweeping things under the rug isn't helpful

Though, yeah, it is made clear in the rules, which I appreciate

Hey Mika welcome to WomensStuff we're really glad to have you. I say it for several reasons, including that we welcome all groups under the trans umbrella.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for all your reports in this thread guys! Really appreciate you helping the mods keep WomensStuff safe

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks to the mods for the unrewarding work of filtering away the incels, MGTOW, MRA, PUA, and "nice guys" that tend to plague any women's space.

You're welcome ZDL 😊

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

A gross retort I heard that's always stuck with me: "a boyfriend's a speed bump, not a stop sign"

🤮

Wish I could go back to my younger self just so I could tell that guy (and the others) to go fuck themselves.

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"just because there's a goalie doesn't mean you can't score"

🤮

yeah me too

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh wow! That's somehow even grosser than the speed bump thing! 😮

[–] hazl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"aaahhhhahaha okayyy...", also no. But I probably need to work on being more direct.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Yeah I do basically the same thing, it's rough when you actually want something but on the outside seem uncertain or reserved because you internally constantly think people hate you haha. And then it makes it difficult for the other person

Probably why I enjoy saying like "do whatever unless I say [safe word]". But still something that I need to work on, and actually be like, directly communicating. It's healthy

Edit: on a second read, I slightly misinterpreted your comment, but I'll leave it

load more comments (4 replies)

I'm drunk is not an invitation. Fucken maggots.

[–] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago (4 children)

"I have a boy/girlfriend" doesn't necessarily mean anything. Times have changed, folks.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"I have a boy/girlfriend" is supposed to stop you.

"Do you mind that I have a boy/girlfriend? " is meant to keep your interest while being transparent.

Know what is being said.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 5 points 2 days ago

This right here. Context is king, yo!

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I disagree with this sentiment that you are trying to convey. If language has to have intent assumed outside of context especially if the context is no -- "no" should just be said and that should be respected fully.

[–] Bongles@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

I mean if you're in a situation and they say "I have a boy/girlfriend" you could say "is that a no?" If for some reason you think it might not be.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 5 points 2 days ago

It must be nice to live in a world where there are zero men who behave like mental toddlers in the bodies of, well, men who become a real threat when told simple words like "no".

Most of us don't live in that world, but are insanely jealous of those of you who apparently do.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Should is doing a lot of work here. Sadly no isn't respected still.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If someone is daying it in response to you hitting on them, it definitely does mean something. Even if someone might potentially be open to poly in another situation, if you're like "hey you're cute, wanna hang out" and they come back with "i have a partner" then thats them blowing you off for sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 5 points 2 days ago

It never "necessarily" meant anything. But even today it usually means something. And specifically if it's being used in response to a pass, it means "NO".

But you probably already knew that, right? You're just arguing to be argumentative, right?

🙄

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago

Incorrect, even us polyamorous people understand its intended meaning.

[–] faizalr@fedia.io 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Respect women with attitude.

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I love this comment because I read it as show your respect via attitude.

[–] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 9 points 3 days ago

Love this!!

[–] quacky@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Here is my best articulation for why this image irks me

  • insecure pose is related to its brethren of other insecure poses, such as the peace sign ✌️😉✌️, tongue sticking out😜, duck lips😙
  • there is this weird lust for such poses
  • the brand clothing indicating commodity fetishism aka lust
  • the coffee indicating lack of self control and gluttony/lust aka addiction
  • expectation for others to read your mind when speaking indirectly, vaguely, or with innuendo
  • closed-mindedness to the world of opportinity
  • the sublte implication of superiority
  • the callous disregard for the other person
  • the lack of empathy
  • the excessive self-conciet and pride in oneself
[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Here's my best articulation for why this post irks me:

You are so fucking full of yourself that you are currently inhaling your own intestinal methane using the most efficient placement possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] quacky@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

One would guess that women drive consumerism, but the data shows that both men and women are equally materialistic and status-hungry on average in a population. The difference are the types of commodities they buy.

[–] klemptor@startrek.website 7 points 2 days ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›