this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
217 points (82.0% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

7975 readers
117 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Maybe it’s the retro-futuristic style or reminiscent of sci-fi and cyperpunk, but I genuinely really like the design.

I would never buy one due to the MYRIAD issues plaguing the stainless steel body, interior build quality, or give Tesla money. But still a cool looking car, if nonfunctional truck.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iconic_admin@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

Nice, an unpopular opinion. Good on you.

It looks like the truck that a person who’s never used a truck would build.

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 3 days ago (4 children)

From some angles it looks cool, but from others it's not very well designed. When it was first unveiled I liked the boldness, but in the end even the design comes apart rather quickly.

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 9 points 3 days ago

Exactly. The aesthetic itself isn't the problem (although not at all what I would want my vehicle to look like), it's just really badly executed. Some features like the headlight bar looks cool from certain angles, but all the proportions just feel wrong, the silhouette is awful and it just looks so enormous and stupid in person.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Have you ever looked at one from behind? Goofiest, ugliest shit ever from the rear.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I bet you like the St. Anger snare too, you absolute madman. Points for being unpopular.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 11 points 3 days ago (6 children)

It's actually futuristic, which would be neat if Tesla's owner didn't think that the societies that cyberpunk works depict are something to strife for. Plus, that kind of edgy design is hostile to cyclists and pedestrians.

[–] Oka@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

All cars are hostile to pedestrians and cyclists

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

True, but it still makes a big difference whether the car is deadly at 30 km/h or already at 15 km/h.

[–] fluckx@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

~~It's also hostile to all other cars. The lack of crumple zone makes it a hazard to everyone and everything except the person in it.~~

Edit: I stand corrected, see below

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 10 points 3 days ago

I will second this very unpopular opinion. I don’t quite like the Tesla truck but I like that fresh direction. I think with some minor tweaks it could look a lot cooler and still keep the polygon sci-fi vibe. If it wasn’t being killed I bet future versions of it could have been really neat.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 2 days ago

i agree, but i think they ruined it by curving the front (probably for practical purposes)

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago

I like the way they cool. Too bad about everything else.

[–] Xella@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

I don't like the truck as a whole but the shape is peak Nintendo 64 and I love it. I wish it was a better vehicle so I could own one.

[–] barfplanet@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

My 2yo daughter saw one in a parking lot and said "that one's magic."

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I think it looks decent with a white or black skin, I'm not really a fan of the silver look

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I think it looks pretty good from the side, but from pretty much any other angle it's just an ugly box.

When it was first revealed, I was a fan of the design (not that I was going to be buying anything from muskrat) but the more I saw of it the less I liked the looks.

It's kind of like they spent the whole time designing it from the side view, then ran out of time before they were going to reveal it and decided to just connect the two sides with some rectangles and straight lines.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It would make a cool Hot Wheels diecast if the proportions were closer to a normal vehicle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fair take, and well stated. Looks are subjective, so can’t really fault someone for liking the look of something I think looks overdone at best. Extra points for recognizing that it was clearly designed by someone who has never needed a truck for anything more than helping someone move or hauling expensive weekend toys.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 5 points 3 days ago

Agree on liking the retro-futuristic vibe!

Sure, it’s impractical for aerodynamics and problematic for crashes, but vibe wise I like it. At first, I thought it was bold that someone would look at an old sci-fi magazine and go for the aesthetic. But, you know, sci-fi cover art doesn’t need to deal with practical issues. While here, it really feels like they overlooked quite some other problems to sacrifice them to “the aesthetic”. I think one can still like the design while thinking it is a bad idea.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›