this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
217 points (82.0% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

7975 readers
123 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Maybe it’s the retro-futuristic style or reminiscent of sci-fi and cyperpunk, but I genuinely really like the design.

I would never buy one due to the MYRIAD issues plaguing the stainless steel body, interior build quality, or give Tesla money. But still a cool looking car, if nonfunctional truck.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rezad@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

raccoons' reaction seeing a cybertruck:

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

the aesthetic is fine if it were like 40% smaller

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Some of the original renders I saw were so much better…

[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oof. That looks even worse to me.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I’m not sure how it could look worse than the current version.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That looks like a giant sante fe.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah I guess it kinda does.

[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

When the Cybertruck was revealed in 2019 the announced price was starting at $39,900.

The specifications were great.

Cyberpunk was about to be released.

Teslas were still pretty cool.

The Cybertruck looked like a giant Delorean electric truck.

Elon Musk had said some questionable things, but was still "Elon Musk" from Iron Man 2 and Star Trek: Discovery.

If the Cybertruck had actually been offered for sale in 2019 for $39,900, I would have bought one. Without hesitation.

In 2025 I wouldn't be caught dead in one because I don't want anything to do with the politics of Tesla and Elon Musk.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Don't forget Elon "Volunteering at a soup kitchen" Musk from the Big Bang Theory.

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They also fall apart, frequently suffer major breakdowns, and are deathtraps

[–] TheMinions@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

It looks like garbage. In like every way. And I'm a car guy. It's not political. It's a big old pile of "not worth 120". I can buy two Toyotas with more satisfaction in style and performance.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago

I've heard dudes in maga hats say it's fugly.

So truly unpopular, have an orange arrow.

[–] aedelred@lemmy.world 153 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Upvote because that truly is an unpopular opinion from what I’ve seen and I think they make the Pontiac Aztec look classy.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

The Aztec was also a huge disappointment in that the concept car design and features were outstanding but very different from what was eventually delivered

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 38 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (8 children)

They make PT Cruisers look like a sick ride.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

you're pushing it, probably because it broke down

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

I guess the Cyber Truck could be cool if it fit in with any of its potential surroundings. Everywhere it goes it just stands out like a sore thumb. There is no city or landscape that matches the aesthetic. It's like seeing a suped up F350 in the middle of NYC. Even if you like those giant trucks it will always look out of place in a big city. Or like seeing a Lamborghini way out on a dirt road in the boonies. It just wouldn't look right. I don't think there are currently any places that exist that match the aesthetic of a cyber truck. It makes me feel like when a high graphical game doesn't render an object correctly and it comes in low poly.

[–] bss03 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At one point I really wanted to get a Delorean -- the angles, the materials, the doors, all very cool; plus BttF is a nice trilogy that reminds me of being a child. The cybertruck hits a lot of the same notes, so I can understand.

But, honestly, even my current car has too much central monitoring, data collection, and even control than I wanted. I really only bought it because my (the current) previous car was quickly dying.

I knew from Teslas claims and their other cars that there was just too much of that fiddly bullshit involved. So even without considering Elmu, a cybertruck was a clear No.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Why not buy a nice pre-2015 car with none of that data collecting crap installed? You have a lot of good options. Swap out the stereo with a modern one for Android Auto/Apple Carplay and you're good to go.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 73 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, you’re using the community for its intended purpose.

[–] alt_xa_23@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

An unpopular opinion? In my unpopular opinion community?

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

Then go buy an 80s car with an actual good angular design and convert it to electric.

Some similar aesthetic options:

  • VW Scirocco or early Golf/Rabbit
  • Early Lotus Esprit
  • Delorean
  • Fiat X1
  • Triumph TR7
  • 80s Alfa Romeos
  • 80s Lancias (Beta, or Delta for instance)
  • anything from the late 60s to late 80s designed by Giorgetto Giugiaro

They are angular wedge designs, but done with care and thought to manufacturing, some safety (at least from sharp edges), and almost all of them are aesthetically pleasing.

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The difference in "ability to avoid serious injury or death in a crash" between an 80s and modern car is the hangup for me. Particularly in a country where I have to share the road with comically huge pickups and SUVs.

As a cool weekend "drive around a bit" car: sure. But not as a daily driver.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah I hear you, it’s a hang up with me as well. Driving one is a lot like riding a bike or motorcycle, it makes me hyper focused and cautious, especially during merges and stop and go traffic.

Having a decent EV setup would at least make it capable of accelerating and keeping up with modern traffic. Which, speaking from experience, would help, but not eliminate the treat by any means.

I stopped bike commuting after moving to a more rural area where lack of bike lanes, brodozers, frauhauspanzers, and cellphone distractions have made it too risky.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Ioniq 5 has a better 'cyber' look than the Truck. Like a fat hatchback.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

That was going to be my next suggestion, good call. I do like it, but wish they’d make a similarly styled sporty car version.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then go buy an 80s car with an actual good angular design and convert it to electric.

You say that like it's easy to do for anyone. 😅

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (5 children)

As much as any one can buy a Cybertruck for $80k, yeah.

You can get an 80s car with a dead motor for less than 1/10th a cybertruck

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Have you seen one in person? They look... Not great in pictures, but like... Passable as a curiosity. In person? Monstrous and ugly as fuck. Also the bare steel is just a horrible choice.

load more comments (4 replies)

I maintain they look a lot better painted or wrapped, Musk knows this, and deliberately figured out a way to make painting the 100k pieces of shit the buyer's financial responsibility.

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

They should have made it look like the truck from Halo.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just curious if you've seen one in person or just online.

Cuz I didn't like how they looked online. But seeing them in person was just a whole another thing. I've seen a few, My personal opinion is the proportions are just off in every way. It's bigger than you'd think but also it looks like the cab is a lot smaller. It reminds me of toy vehicles you give like 5-year-olds. If it was just an RC car, I probably be fine with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 43 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (23 children)

Meanwhile, in actual Cyberpunk media. I disagree with you so hard that I deeply regret I only have one upvote to give. Well done.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Nah.

It is too simplistic.

Too low poly.

Unrefined.

Too anti-functional.

Almost like some ketamine addict drew it on a napkin and then stuttered 'M - Mm - Make it like, lo- look like this' to some unpaid intern.

It is, imo, an idiot's take on retro future as a style guide.

........

in contrast, we have....

DeLorean.

This Hyundai N Vision 74 concept car.

The modular Slate E Truck.

Those are retro future, look better (imo), and also ... the DeLorean both actually exists, and also actually works, and the Slate truck seems to have at least a decent shot at actually existing.

EDIT: Whoops, I was out of date with my info, looks like the Hyundai N 74 also will actually be produced.

Notice how these look like they could actually maybe be in the background of a shot from the OG Blade Runner, or Akira, or OG Ghost in the Shell... or would not look very out of place in Cyberpunk 2077?

......

All that being said, I do want to join the chorus of people saying this is a great topic for unpopular opinion, lol.

load more comments (4 replies)

I'm glad there is more variety on the road because of it. I think it's ugly. But the fact that every car has turned into a grey CUV is boring.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's a saying in Brazil, "Everyone has their taste and asshole" (Gosto e cu, cada um tem o seu), because some people have a shit taste

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›