this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
-21 points (26.7% liked)

Technology

41030 readers
51 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sepi@piefed.social 24 points 3 months ago

No, it's not.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 18 points 3 months ago

This feels written by an LLM trained on exclusively Wikipedia and apple marketing

[–] 01189998819991197253 12 points 3 months ago

Wow, they're really trying hard to justify their €2,000 sink into a nonrepairable phone.

[–] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This article gave me zero idea what a square front camera is.

Does it mean that the sensor is a square instead of a rectangle? I'm confused.

[–] sanzky@beehaw.org 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

yes. it is a square sensor that the phone crops automatically to be a a rectangle. so it can take photos on landscape or portrait no matter if the phone physically vertical or horizontal.

[–] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 months ago

Well well, isn't that amazing /s

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But.. why? Just give me the full image.

[–] sanzky@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I’m sure most people expectation are the standard aspect ratios. People want to go and upload it or share it without having to crop it first for the right framing

But probably there will be some third party camera app that will allow this (like they allow raw)

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

so in other words it's automatically removing some of my image in order to fake being portrait or landscape?

[–] sanzky@beehaw.org 4 points 3 months ago

I don’t see how it would be fake. people have cropped photos to change framing for a long time and no one called it fake.

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe if I used my selfie camera more often than never.

[–] xylol@leminal.space 7 points 3 months ago

I use it sometimes, when I need to connect a USB to the back of my PC I use it to see where the port is

[–] Kissaki@beehaw.org 9 points 3 months ago

This reads like an ad, with the romanticized stories.

We take photos to preserve memories, but selfies feel distinctive for their intimacy.

Feel distinctive; You sure it's not the wider view angle leading to morphed images?

[–] cercello@mastodon.bida.im 7 points 3 months ago

@along_the_road
Lowest of low bars here.

[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 months ago

I had something longer typed out, but this is just... So dumb

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 3 points 3 months ago

During the iPhone 17 launch event, Apple revealed that its customers took 500 billion selfies last year, a massive figure that shows just how normalized the practice has become.

Selfies were often mocked when they were deemed the purview of Instagram-obsessed teenage girls, but these days it's not unusual to see everyone from seniors to a gaggle of sports bros gathering around a single phone like an object of worship.

Yes, now everyone is Instagram-obsessed, not just teenage girls. The ageism and misogyny was wrong. The negative assessment of people being vain was not.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago

It's definitely a bigger deal than I think. Given that the baseline of selfie camera expectations is "nothing." So any utility would count.