this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
122 points (100.0% liked)

World News

687 readers
662 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person, don't post hate.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hey Republicans. Where does this train end, if y’all refuse to get off as the lawbreaking gets more and more egregious? Is there any point at which you will disembark?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Only once it affects them personally.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

And only if it really affects them. 5-10% off their net worth is nothing compared to the power they seek.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

Not even then.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Can…can we encourage that outcome somehow?

[–] glowie 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not a Repub, but this isn’t unique to one party. Biden fell under criticism for something similar by bombing Iranian-backed militias in Syria. No matter the president’s political affiliation, they all are war pigs.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Both sides, huh? That’s what you’re going with? Sorry, but Biden’s presidency wasn’t a blatant fascist systemic takeover and dismantling of our systems of government. Trump’s very much IS. So that’s a little bit of a differentiator there.

[–] glowie 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now that’s a completely different set of issues and arguments lol. I was discussing purely the “illegal” wars that each president has carried out during their terms, upholding the Military Industrial Complex standard.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is reality. One can’t hope to gain anything useful or non-detrimental from cherry picked comparisons. And I would argue even then we are not looking at the same types or severity or blatantness of egregious disregard for the rule of law. And that’s not even taking into account the underlying goals, and intentions, and motivating factors for these actions, which are frankly dialectically and morally opposite.

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

Agreed. We compromised our way into full fascism, people need to draw lines and refuse to cross them or nothing will change. Healthy boundaries make the world go ‘round.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

A snowball's chance in hell of the GOP's fascist bootlickers letting this pass - or enforcing it on the off-chance it does come to pass - but it's good that Rep. Omar is bringing this up.