this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
379 points (98.7% liked)

politics

25651 readers
2300 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 49 points 4 days ago (3 children)
  • I can condemn violence.
  • I can support free speech, even if it's not what I like.
  • I can still despise that vile piece of shit.
  • I can still say he gushed hatred and misinformation.
  • I can still say society is better, safer in his absence.
  • I will not condone; but neither will I mourn.
[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yes, this is logical. However, logic doesn't create views, likes, clicks, or comments, so we don't need logic. We need anger and hatred for engagement. We need perpetual algorithmic attention or the machine will fail. The children whose bodies stop the rest of the bullets are mere meat for its consumption and your logic would starve it.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

He also gushed blood... fuck 'em.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Can I condemn the murder and still be glad this piece of shit got what he deserved?

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Yup. Wealthy white people are just mad that the rules of the game apply to them now as well. You're going to treat everyone who doesn't fit your ideology as disposable and less than? Don't be surprised if those very same people treat you the same.

The fear of Wealthy people getting gunned down on a random Wednesday is the very same reality Black Americans have been living with their whole lives. Welcome to America, I'm so glad wealthy people could finally join us.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Their risk of getting murdered is still a lot lower that for low income people.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

They didn’t shed one fucking tear for the two kids killed in Colorado on the same day. They jumped straight to murdering leftists before even knowing who the killer was.

And it turns out, the killer was ultra-MAGA.

Fuck the rich. Fuck the right. Fuck the rich right fucks.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Nah, im not gonna condemn this. He fucked around and found out. We are at a point in the U.S. where polite discourse doesn't get you anywhere anymore.

Once you start advocating for putting people in camps, and wanting to harm people for just existing, I stop caring about what happens to you as a person.

[–] Newsteinleo 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I find it hard to condemn this act of physical violence when Charlie Kirk was so willing to engage in acts of emotional and violence.

Although, having watched some of the things Mr Kirk said, I think the man might have had some mental health issues (dude was convinced angels and demons were influencing polotics), and I do consider myself a advocate for the mentally ill. So, in that framework I have say "This was the tragic result of a mentally ill man being miss treated by a society that does not value mental health enough".

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Mental health issues isn't an excuse for being a piece of shit though. You can have mental health issues and also be the nicest person in the world. This guy spewed hatred and violent rhetoric everywhere he went.

Being a nazi is not a mental health issue.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Tbh it was a pretty poetic and well-timed murder. I didn’t think it was that hideous.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If he were here I'm sure he would encourage us to not let politics hijack the narrative and remind us that some gun deaths are a small price to pay for 2nd amendment rights

[–] Saeveo@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

It's what he would have wanted.

[–] Chookitypok@piefed.social 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Okay, I'll condemn political violence against fascist enablers.

When the political violence exerted by states against their or other people will also be condemned ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah we literally just had the mobster in chief order a hit on 11 random civilians in a boat. If you believe in the sanctity of human life, isn’t that 11 times as bad? Yet the media hasn’t even bothered to report their names.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

No war but a class war.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 4 days ago

The whole white washing someone after they died is the most insane thing that society has decided upon. As soon as someone is dead, society says that all their sins are forgiven and we should not speak ill of them.

When someone dies, they don't magically stop being racist, sexist, transphobic, Nazi shit bag. Charlie Kirk was a piece of shit in life and still a piece of shit in death.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago

We can condemn political violence and this hideous murder

[–] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Smells like a Presidential Medal of Freedom. Because you know, hate mongers stick together. In other news, looks like a white Christian 22 year old male was turned in by his church... so radical

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ehh, I'm pretty sure I'm going to celebrate his murder, I dont care.

What, you expect me to condemn whoever killed Hitler next?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Well, since Hitler killed Hitler, yes. Not for killing himself, all the other stuff he did.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Right, I actually hate the asshole who killed Hitler.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

What about all the good things Hitler did? Like killing Hitler?

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

intolerance cannot be tolerated!

[–] Corelli_III@midwest.social 3 points 4 days ago

Its pretty funny that the do-nothing democrat clickbait websites like Common Dreams and Jacobin and Mother Jones are running this "we all have to cry for the nazi boy" rhetoric just because they know its good rage-click slop.

Just fuck off with this shit, idk why the kayfabe marks find this entertaining

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

The man actually dared anyone. He was proved wrong.

[–] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 3 points 4 days ago (5 children)

THANKYOU. His views were vile, his behaviour was repugnant, and no doubt the world is better without him. That doesn't mean it's ok to kill someone because their views are awful!! I'm horrified seeing how many people think it's ok to do this

[–] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Soo... who is disenfranchising these Nazis? Who is systematically taking away their resources? Because it looks to me like they keep getting stronger, and I don't know what else will stop them other than fear of death.

Don't forget, fascists ultimately want to horrifically murder anyone who doesn't blindly obey them. So if it must be either civilized people or them... sorry Charlie, you gotta go.

Or did you want to wait and sacrifice a few dozen more innocent people so we could have yet more incontrovertible truth that fascist ideologies always lead to fascist outcomes?

Would I overwhelmingly prefer he was deplatformed for his hate, ridiculed out of every spotlight, or censured through judicial means? Absolutely. 'Vigilante justice' on its own is no justice at all. But if this is a trolley problem, I know for a fact where I'm putting the switch. Do you?

In case you're not familiar: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

[–] Greddan@feddit.org 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Even he said it was OK and "worth it" if he got killed. He also said that people shouldn't have empathy.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He literally thought empathy was a new and made up concept.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's worse, he didn't think it was new. He knew it was a thing, and he was spreading the Evangelical (Christofascist) "The Sin of Empathy" rhetoric.

One example: https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/the-enticing-sin-of-empathy

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

I hadn't heard of that, thanks.

Regardless of what he may have actually thought this is what he publicly stated:

"I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that — it does a lot of damage."

[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

Yeah extrajudicial execution has no place in this world! (except for when, for example, trump wants to do it to venezuelans, or something like that. then its a good thing instead of a bad thing)

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's okay to kill Nazis. Because it's not just views. They are spreading violent rhetoric. He spread the white replacement and white genocide bullshit. He spread COVID misinformation. He said blacks were better off before the signing of the Civil Rights act.

He was a dangerous fascist mouthpiece. And now he's not.

Nazi lives don't matter.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 4 points 4 days ago

He would have been happy to kill trans people.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

Violence, politically motivated or otherwise, in unacceptable and has no place in our society.

That said, if it had to happen to someone, which even he believed was worthwhile, then...

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

The Grim Reaper did some cleaning.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Those that promote violence and end up violated, deserve it.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter. The Reichstag has burned. The Maine has sunk. Things are well and truly fucked, and most of the people around here are celebrating.

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

It would have been something else if this hadn't happened.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago

Was he even important? He was kind of a nuisance, a fool to make fun of, but did he matter?