this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
70 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3293 readers
1122 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes.

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Have the day you voted for.

Good luck serving your corporate overlords when they buy your farm for pennies on the dollar and hire you for minimum wage.

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That just means more soybeans for the US, and because supply and demand is still an economic principal, the price will go way down.

/s hahahaa they’re gonna burn them instead of selling them cheaper.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I wonder if soybeans can be turned into ethanol.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 11 hours ago

I mean they can but just like corn or others takes more energy to turn it into that then you get back

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Soybean oil can be transesterified with an alcohol (usually methanol) in the presence of a catalyst to make fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) or “biodiesel.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transesterification

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Interesting.

[–] SacralPlexus@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

The situation echoes the 2018-2020 trade war, during which U.S. agriculture lost $26 billion, with nearly $20 billion in soybean losses alone.

Weird, we tried this a few years back it seems with terrible consequences. Why are we doing this again? Seriously who is starting all of these trade wars?

Oh.

Oh I see.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

Good. They get to feel the ramifications of their choice.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 7 points 2 days ago

Global supplies are good so china can buy elsewhere, but that means someone normally buying from Brazil (the most likely other country to buy from, everyone else is a footnote in soybeans) has to buy from the us as Brazil doesn't grow enough for everything. it doesn't matter what us foreign policy is though, nobody was going to buy all of last years soybeans and this years harvest will just add more.

china typically isn't buying much from the us now anyway even in a normal year, they buy in seasonal patterns and generally would be looking for a few more months unless they were desperate which they wouldn't be with supplies this high.

things are not looking good for farmers, but trump's stupid trade policies are not the important factor here. They are not helping, but they are not the most important story.