this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
152 points (99.4% liked)

politics

25585 readers
2899 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I just got my tariff and duty bills in at my job for late august. Many of the aluminum parts we sell are 50% more now. I just lost THOUSANDS on already processed orders because of these illegal tariffs.

I really wish all the business's would sue the nazi regime for these tariffs as they are illegal and never approved by congress.

All of us are about to see some CRAZY price hikes on aluminum and steel products. Hope you all have been saving since November when we all knew the US was done for.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I just saw some bubbleheaded dumbass on Faux talk about how we have to "dig out from four years of Biden being feckless" or some such craziness.

I mean, I guess we should all thank our lucky stars that only a certain set of special people can see what a hot mess the Biden economy truly was, even if normal people could see all the stats for themselves...it must be a special vision they have, much like RFK being able to see "mitochondrial challenges" in others.

Also, if Kamala had won, we might have had a genocide in Gaza or something, I'm told, so there's that...

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 49 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Anyone else looking sideways at this? Trump fires the chief responsible for jobs numbers, and now they've suddenly got "new data" to argue that it's all actually Biden's fault? Looks like cooking to me.

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't trust a single goddamn thing that comes out of the pedo nazi's fascist regime.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

100% same. I stopped using .gov sites when researching anything.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The CDC covid site just got a face lift, and on first visit, looks to be much less helpful.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Not "than realized" but "than lied to"

[–] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I posted this a few months back and it is still anecdotal but in the Houston metroplex I have noticed a significant amount of commercial for lease signs and it seems to be increasing with time. That is concerning because commercial real estate is often built on credit (mortgages) then the tenant's payments go to pay the loans. When occupancy goes down, the ability to pay that loan goes down until its unsustainable and it goes into default.

If you default on you home loan of say $300,000, its your problem and the bank has recourse and gets your asset. When a commercial loan of $5,000,000 defaults and no one was renting it already, the bank gets the asset but it's not "worth" anything other than the building/land and it is harder for the bank to recoup that value.

When that happens en-masse, that's a problem for the bank... Which makes it a problem for the economy, and it becomes a problem for all of us. This has been going on for a while and no one is doing anything about it. The cliff looks to be approaching.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I've noticed the same. But weirdly they are also building more industrial buildings, just in different areas. I assume because it's cheaper to build a new building than to deal with an old 40 year old one.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

It's going to be a global quagmire. France is basically underwater and the EU probably isn't strong enough to bail them out. China still has property finance problems, even if they did a good job keeping it out of the news.

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 14 points 3 days ago

People have been doing something about it. That's what all the weird return to office intiatives were about. City governements are scared that the downtowns will spiral into collapse so they coerce all the companies that still have downtown offices to get their employees back and spending money at restaurants and such. If the restaurants go out of business and store fronts sit vacant, then there would be no reason for companies to pay a premium for downtown office space and the whole thing collapses Detroit style. Commercial real estate failed to price in remote work, and the covid shutdowns made it obvious just how overpriced and overleveraged it all was.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Biden was trying to get commercial property owners to convert empty office space into apartments, so that was an attempt to correct it.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I never saw any policies on this, do you have an example?

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It was less of a policy, more of a suggestion that went nowhere IIRC. The issue is that commercial property is difficult to convert to residential due to plumbing and building standards (state and zoning laws).

For example, you could never put a residencal floor in the empire state building (or any other tall office building) because you would have to gut the building to put in enough toilets to meet regulations and that would likely be too costly for a landlord to consider.

[–] Postimo@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

It's not just toilet regulations though, its like volume of water from showers, sinks, and shitting that is much higher for residential buildings. Even assuming that no one has in unit laundry.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago

Online shipping has been killing brick and mortar for years, and the pandemic stepped that into high gear.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Stagflation.

Learn about it. Educate yourself and prepare accordingly.

This is gonna suck immensely. For all of us. Unless you're on the top line of our K shaped economy. Ask your parents or grandparents about it.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There's a difference between stagflation of the 1970s and what's happening now.

In the economics of spherical chickens in a vacuum, stagflation should be impossible according to the Keynesian models. If people have jobs, they have money, and that causes inflation. If people don't have jobs, then they don't have money, and inflation should come down. They're counter-cyclical. A situation where you have high unemployment and high inflation shouldn't happen.

What they missed then was a single commodity--oil having a manipulated price due to OPEC--causing both high unemployment and high inflation.

The really big problem was what to do about it. The US wasn't able to strongarm OPEC into dropping oil prices. If the Fed were to raise interest rates, that would bring inflation down, but make unemployment even worse. Drop interest rates, and unemployment comes down, but inflation goes through the roof. What the Fed ultimately did under Volcker was to say fuck it, we're raising interest rates until inflation is under control, then back it off to bring unemployment under control. It was tough medicine, but it did work. Probably saved capitalism at a time when the Soviet Union still could have won the cold war. Not that the hardcore libertarian capitalists ever gave him credit for it.

The difference now is that we have a very clear reason why it's happening: Trump's tariffs. Unlike the situation with OPEC, the US has complete control over that factor. There would need to be negotiations with other countries to drop reciprocal tariffs, but since tariffs hurt in both directions, most are going to be amenable.

All we have to do is get rid of the insane idiot in charge of things.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’m pretty old and had not heard of it. From Wikipedia:

The term arose from the economic recovery post the COVID-19 pandemic,

[–] logi@piefed.world 5 points 2 days ago

Good info. Thanks. But I think he meant to ask the oldies about stagflation.

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Most of the time span for the report came before President Donald Trump took office, indicating the jobs picture was deteriorating before he began levying tariffs against U.S. trading partners.

Meaning those numbers are old af and it’s a lot worse than that.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Liberals really didn't like leftists trying to point out the bad economy last year.

Good thing telling all the leftists to shut up and get in line worked so well...

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Economy was bad

Leftists said economy was bad, campaign on improving bad economy

Neoliberals told everyone economy was good, to shut up if you think bad

Economy was bad

People mad at Neoliberals for lying

[–] chuymatt@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago

The ECONOMY was GREAT!!

The economy does not include middle class and down (ie, all the working class).

[–] toast@retrolemmy.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Elaborate

< just generally points at everything >

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 days ago

Come on. Be serious.