this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
20 points (83.3% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1458 readers
103 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I was not posting on their instance communities much recently after I promised to pause. The first modlog warning did not reach my inbox on a mobile app using Piefed.ca then the head admin responds a bit too aggressively then makes 3-day warning bans from communities that they personally moderate.

Original warning that I was not notified about in my inbox:

Callout by top admin of Beehaw:

3-day warning bans.

Sources:

https://feddit.uk/post/35173969

https://web.archive.org/web/20250909023333/https://feddit.uk/post/35173969

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 hours ago

If the narrative presented here is true, then I agree with PTB. And from the presented information, it appears likely. However, there are alternative explanations that haven’t been definitely ruled out, like a delayed ban for past behavior.

If a mod from Beehaw sees this and wants to clarify the reason for the ban, that might help.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I'd think it's common sense to set a dang number so you can easily point to it and say: you broke this very clear rule on the max frequency of posts.

[–] shades@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago

"When metrics become targets they are no longer metrics" /s

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 22 hours ago

Par for the course for Beehaw, they've been known to be overbearing and controlling, apparently even when it isn't any of their business. PTB.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

You're better off off there

[–] Nima@leminal.space 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i don't think they called you out. they just made a request that you not flood the instance with multiple posts.

and the temp ban has expired already. i don't believe this to be a power trip.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 14 points 1 day ago

The instance banning of someone for being active outside their instance communities is not okay when I followed the callout.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I wouldn't say this is power tripping bastards. They communicated, they're in a dialogue with you, and they did a very temporary ban inline with their communication with you.

[–] Blaze@lazysoci.al 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know.

Beehaw has always been kind of their own thing, especially defederating LW and SJW.

I wouldn't call it power tripping to want to have a smaller amount of posts per day.

!technology@lemmy.zip is probably a good alternative if you want to avoid the over-centralization on LW. Blahaj should have another one for LGBTQ+

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It’s okay to want less posts per day on their instance but it’s not okay to instance ban someone for being active outside their communities.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry, where does it indicate this is about posts outside the instance?

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

was not posting on their instance communities much recently after I promised to pause.

I was frequently posting us news on !usa@midwest.social instead of !usnews@beehaw.org and yet I was still banned.

Why ban someone who complied with the admin’s comment.

The worry is that this could become permanent because I like posting articles I find interesting. Thanks for asking me to clarify.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The communications you posted are all about beehaw though. What makes you think it was about other communities? Did they explicitly say that?

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

However the ban came out of nowhere for posting outside their instance.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That’s one possible interpretation but the modlog doesn’t explicitly state this.

Did you make any posts on Beehaw between the above conversation and the banning? Maybe they still considered your reduced rate of posts too high. If not, then I agree that would be very weird.

Either way, I think this is a good argument to have an explicit rule regarding what constitutes “too much” rather than relying on common sense which is highly subjective.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago

That’s one possible interpretation but the modlog doesn’t explicitly state this.

The modlog doesn't have to state it for it to be the case. Intentions can be masked.

Did you make any posts on Beehaw between the above conversation and the banning? Maybe they still considered your reduced rate of posts too high. If not, then I agree that would be very weird.

I barely made any posts due to the earlier conversation.

Either way, I think this is a good argument to have an explicit rule regarding what constitutes “too much” rather than relying on common sense which is highly subjective.

I agree with that. However a remote poster posting outside their instance should not warrant a ban on their instance for this.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You check the pages of the related comms:

https://beehaw.org/c/technology

https://beehaw.org/c/lgbtq_plus

There's only 1 post from me on !lgbtq_plus@beehaw.org on the front page.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 11 points 1 day ago

It looks like I was instance banned:

[–] kip@piefed.zip -3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

YDI. avg 25 posts a day just on this account is spambot behaviour. how are you called sunshine when you never see any

[–] UniversalMonk@anarchist.nexus 1 points 4 hours ago

Everyone complains that Lemmy doesn't have enough content. So you're mad when people post content?

IMHO, the more posts, the better as long as it's not advertising.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

25 posts is relatively normal for social media usage

[–] kip@piefed.zip 2 points 12 hours ago

Might not be too unusual if it included replies/comments but this is just top level posts