this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
571 points (99.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3286 readers
946 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes.

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Monday, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to use racial profiling in its militarized immigration raids across Los Angeles, halting an injunction that had barred officers from targeting Latinos based on ethnicity. The court did not explain the reason for its shadow docket order, which appeared to split 6–3 along ideological lines. In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor warned that the decision was “unconscionably irreconcilable with our nation’s constitutional guarantees,” opening the door to violent persecution of Latinos—including American citizens—by “masked agents with guns.” The majority did not respond to this extraordinary charge, perhaps because it is so obviously true.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 4 points 8 hours ago

To think the USA only just got rid of Jim Crow.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago

I saw this coming. The SCOTUS is already compromised.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Absolutely zero sympathy for the Latinos who drank the fucking Orange Kool-Aid and support Krasnov. None and I hope those dip shits get a taste of ICE.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

The court did not explain the reason for its shadow docket order

Cool that they can just do this.

[–] philosloppy@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago

yeah, it turns out unelected, lifetime appointees with the power to interpret the law with no oversight was a bad idea.

[–] aquafunk@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 18 hours ago

If they don't have to explain themselves, then they shouldn't expect one when the angry mob shows up at their door 🤷

[–] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 hours ago

Kavanaugh did, in a concurrence. I strongly disagree with his Opinion but at least he put words to paper. the others didn't, so I assume the conservatives are fighting about the legal basis for their ruling.

they will have to eventually explain themselves at least, once this case makes it to the regular docket.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 36 points 19 hours ago

It starts with Latinos, it won't end there.

Thanks there Latino's for Trump.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's up to armed communities to now protect ourselves from the federal government.

Buy guns before they start blocking access.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 10 points 14 hours ago

Become ungovernable

[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 20 hours ago

At least no Latinos voted for Trump, right? Right?

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 26 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

As a brown person. Yeah this is not new, America’s mask is just off now.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

What, you think people weren't just bidding on George Zimmerman's paintings for his artistic capacity? Incidentally, someone who would have been prime illegal ICE detainment material had he not signaled as he did to the MAGA crowd. I imagine he's their "one good Hispanic".

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 7 points 19 hours ago

If this shitcircus was only affecting the US i wouldn't care, but it's not.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

As an outsider I'm genuinely shocked. So much for the melting pot. :(

The fact that the conservatives didn't bother to explain their reasoning is entirely damning.

[–] ReallyAngryNerd@europe.pub 12 points 20 hours ago

Nazis gonna nazi.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago

"Because we can."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 135 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (26 children)

It's time to purge the Supreme Court. It's clear that they don't give a shIt about the law or the constitution. They are the activist judges the Republicans always whined about.

[–] Runaway@lemmy.zip 15 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I mean I think it's time to purge the whole govt and try again. The system is clearly broken beyond repair

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

Yes. When the wealthy and powerful have everything and the rest have nothing the rest burn the system down and start again.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Establishment dems are not up to it even if they could win now and they cannot. We need muscular populists that can build and run a political machine, new leadership across the board.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

The problem is, I believe, that a large portion of the US population likes the current cruelty and revenge based regime. They are seething with resentment at being made to feel stupid by the "intellectual elites", backwards by the "progressives", ignorant by the "woke", etc and eat up the "you are right to hate those people who make you feel bad" message the christofascists are feeding them.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

No one actually feels this way naturally, this is all propaganda made up by the conservatives. False grievances combined with forty years of hate radio has taught a large part of the population to hate everyone but their supposed "in" group.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You don't think that the red hats are seeting with resentment at being made to feel stupid by the "intellectual elites"? Why do they complain about the "intellectual elites" then? Why do they complain about the "woke" or the "progressive"? They are seething with resentment about being told that their intolerant, backwards, racist beliefs are bad. That's why they love the cruelty. They love Trump because he's spiteful and cruel. I watched a video where Jennie Gage, a former Mormon, white supremacist, Trumper said, "I loved Trump because he was mean."

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Let's be clear, I am not going to blame a large portion of the population for being lied to. I listened to years of Rush Limbaugh (not willingly) so I know where their made-up grievances come from. I have watched countless hours of Fox News, I see how they spin information.

Simply put, propaganda works. They are using the best of psychological to manipulate people. Do I hate it? Yes I do.

They have indoctrinated so many people I know and loved and turned them into haters who parrot their garbage without any critical thought.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Let’s be clear, I am not going to blame a large portion of the population for being lied to.

I'm not blaming them for being lied to. I'm blaming them for not doing the absolute minimum critical thinking to realize that they are being lied to. We've all heard the lies. Tens of millions of people listened to those lies, thought about them critically, and came to the conculsion that they were weapons grade bullshit.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Completely agree. There was a reason conservatives threw a shit fit two decades ago when high schoolers were going to be taught critical thinking skills. They fought tooth and nail to prevent it from happening.

Critical thinking skills and the skills of forming your own opinion and defending it with facts and logic should be taught in grade school. Instead most students are not introduced this until college.

Now you know why the right hates colleges so much and are so desperate to have their ideology taught as factual. They can't have anyone using critical thinking skills otherwise their house of cards will fall down.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Completely agree.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 5 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

People are mad and know they are being screwed if not by whom. The right is misdirecting their anger, while the Democrats do not even try to direct it playing the currents the right set.

With real leadership, it would make public opinion. It would Channel the anger towards its actual sources.

By allowing these Democrats to be the opposition we have surrendered the field and waste our efforts on doomed strategies.

People want reform, if we do not give it to them, the right will.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is tyranny. Literal and explicit, without exaggeration.

Understand that and act accordingly.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago

The court did not address the worst rights violations: the ice agents refused to return the victims' Real ID (driver's license) and they probably copied his phone.

Meaning after taking his ID they can then indefinitely incarcerate him for not having ID. They can also prevent him from driving because he does not have a driver's license.

And they added his data to a criminal database along with all of his social contacts and communication.

[–] lowleekun@ani.social 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The Supreme Court is a joke but the clowns are not really funny, more like sad and pathetic.

As it does not really matter what happens as long as "our side" wins, republican voters won't give a fuck. Also does not help that they are a bunch of stupid bigots that will cheer on this "decision".

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I bet all the latinos that voted for Trump are thrilled.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 14 hours ago

Man, the community can be incredibly dumb. I just had a coworker ask me yesterday for advice because one of her friends is being harassed by a 'boss' and can't say anything because one of the threats he has on her is about her immigration status. Then during the rest of the day, she's making pro trump comments.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 14 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The judges are owned by the federalist society, groomed and chosen from law school for siding with the party and the half century plans to end the republic in all but name for a one party plutocratic state.

Prez just hijacked the party, and whipped them into line again recently disparraging the very association that put them there.

The in crowd is rightfully worried about getting thrown out of the club. They also probably have some scandals on these judges the society holds to encourage their allegiance.

Much as the fitting historical parrallel, the borgia pope in the 16th century, the one machivelli based his prince on, the spanish pope nominated cardinals that he had compromised with prostitutes, and compromised existing ones.

We need focus on the federalist society, they are calling the shots or at least making the draft picks. They are also up to expanding the same secret society model to other areas, a federalist society for everything as Leonard Leo sold it, and got gifted I forget a billion or several from some chicago magnate dickhead in his old age, ul-something, ulrich maybe idk.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

For us it begins at the grassroots. We don't have billionaires willing to create a national organization. So form small liberal groups, and then network them together. I'm serious. I started a group for queer men last year, now I am taking over the entire progressive scene in my state by creating an overarching organization that connects over a dozen key players (ACLU, Prides, migrant and trans organizations). If we did this in every area, and then networked THEM... well shit we'd have a base of power and even fundraising capabilities. IDK what else to do.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

That's awesome.

Thank you.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 4 points 21 hours ago

That is exactly what we need. I live in Deep Red country and I can tell you most people agree on the problems Society faces. We have just been led into different causes and solutions to those problems. With people cooperating on what they agree on, the divisive culture War politics would hardly register with the majority.

First and foremost, people want to be able to make enough money to live a dignified life, and do not support allowing the rich to steal their lunch. They also will support equal rights by and large in an honest accounting of the problem.

We really need such a sort of citizens Union like we are speaking of sort of here, but also a Consumers Union to cooperate on the goods we are sold, and more than anything we need a sort of investors Union, where people can't pull their money to create companies that are not run solely on the profit motive in areas where the private sector is unwilling and unable to provide for society's needs. Investors could be offered a fair rate of return while still working towards other goals as well. Especially like Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare and internet cooperatives, alternative energy, etc.

I would like to see a university where people could invent new things while learning in conjunction with others where they could get a share of any innovations that resulted from it being developed by one of these benefit corps. on the investors union.

Instead of throwing obscene amounts of money down the drain to these bloated corrupted educational institutions, that money could be used to actually do things.

It is a little late in the game for all of these aspirational goals but it will never be easier than it is now despite 20 years ago being the right time for these.

load more comments
view more: next ›