this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
905 points (99.5% liked)

World News

49656 readers
2548 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The artwork, which shows a judge hitting a protester with a gavel, was confirmed by the elusive street artist.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 10 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

One of two security officers outside the building said they did not know how much longer they would be required to stand guard, adding, "At least it's not raining."

There's nothing I love more than hearing British people complain about being forced to do the one job that they have. Miserable sods.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

he should have painted Keir Starmer's face on it

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 160 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That’s a good piece of art

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 77 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just dropped this in another thread, best copy I've found of just the mural:

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not showing for me somehow

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Yeah I was gonna say, that's a fucking awesome piece! What do they do in situations like this? Paint over it?

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 90 points 1 day ago (5 children)

They cordoned it off and covered it with tarps or sheets. They don't want to paint over it or destroy it because it's instantly worth a fortune and nobody knows exactly what to do, which is part of the genius of it.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 22 hours ago

It is just delicious how their knee-jerk reaction of "lets hide it" reveals so much about their mindset and how much that mural hits the target as critique of the true role of their profession in present day Britain.

They reacted as the guilty do, not the innocent.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 62 points 1 day ago

Yeah I saw in the article that they covered it up and posted guards. Kind of ironic if they end up removing the section of wall and making a ton of money selling it.

"Look, Banksy thinks we're committing atrocities! We're gonna be rich!!"

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

it’s instantly worth a fortune

The whole point of Banksy is most of his public work cannot be resold.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"He no longer sells photographs or reproductions of his street graffiti, but his public "installations" are regularly resold, often even by removing the wall on which they were painted"

The latest articles have also stated that the art will be preserved for it's "historic value" which is even more funny. They don't want anyone to see it, they find it offensive and deeply troubling for calling out abuse of power... but they are going to spend a fortune to preserve it or resell it in some way.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 19 points 1 day ago

To a degree, people will cut out chunks of wall to sell a banksy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hector@lemmy.today 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah they plan on painting over it. They covered it up and put two policemen to guard it to make sure nobody looks at it.

[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not dystopian or anything.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The UK is about just as fucked up as the United States is right now in a lot of ways, their leader is just don't say stupid shit constantly. They have basically made it illegal to protest, not just on the Gaza on a lot of stuff, environmental, global warming, and the judges just took away the defenses protesters were using, not allowing them to say why they were doing it. And they are hitting him with these huge sentences is not like it's months in jail we're talking years or more.

Just to give you an idea of where they are at there was another recent case where a woman that took some abortion pills that she got from the doctor as per their laws was charged under some like 19th century law with some huge felony charge. She got not guilty but not for lack of trying on the prosecutor's part.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And they're not even ruled by the conservative parties. This is the good outcome!

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm absolutely baffled at Labour. The Tories were a complete clown show, and it should have been trivial to put up some serious opposition against them, but they never did. Only when the Tories really burned out, did Labour win, and they're immediately giving us Tories-light. The same shit, just toned down 20%.

When does the UK start voting for better parties? Replace the Tories with LibDem and Labour with the Greens. If I lived in England, I'd be upset I couldn't vote for SNP. Every other party is better than these two.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 2 points 19 hours ago

Let me tell you about the tale of Neoliberalism and the center "left". Our story begins in the 1980s, but it really takes of in the early 2000s. At the time a bloke named Tony was ruling the UK as prime minister and he had a fine Atze ruling Germany, whose name was Gerhard...

Together they dismantled social security, raised taxes on their people, and lowered taxes on their rich friends. They sold much of their realm to their rich friends, at a staggering discount. They said this would be best for the people and the global markets would demand, but also reward as such...

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And they got into power because everyone was going "oh shit, we don't want another Trump", then just run full steam ahead into issues that will piss off their base. Someone who hasn't been kept up to date could be excused for thinking the party restricted trans people and arresting peace protesters en masse was the more conservative party.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

They followed their conquering of the Labour Party leadership thanks to a campaign of slanderous accusations of anti-semitism against the previous leader which was done with the help of Israeli-linked Jewish Groups in Britain, with a purge of Leftwingers from the Labour Party.

So it was pretty much expectable that they would be authoritarian rightwingers since that's exactly how they behaved and they associated and got support from exactly that kind of people (having basically been gifted power by the Zionists back when people still thought accusations of anti-semitism coming from Jewish rightwingers were genuine rather than politically weaponized claims of racism).

Mind you, they only won because Britain has First Past The Post and (which is not really a Democratic member of parliament allocation system) and the Reform party split the Tory vote making them lose the top place in lots of electoral circles.

The system in Britain is rotten and the stink has risen enough to be unbearable.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 1 day ago

Guess we finally found who we're not allowed to criticise.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] shane@feddit.nl 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While the mural does not reference a particular cause or incident, its appearance comes two days after almost 900 people were arrested at a London protest against the ban on Palestine Action.

This seems nonsensical to me.

If it were in reference to a particular issue, would that make Banksy a "terrorist?" Maybe it's better to feign uncertainty at the BBC.

[–] Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 61 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The West is dismantling every shibboleth, every sacred cow, in service to genocidal Zionism.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 22 hours ago

There's a lot of West in the West.

That said, you're exactly right for certain Western countries such as Britain, America and Germany.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How does one confirm a true Banksy from a fake when nobody knows who he actually is? How do you verify the Banksy who confirmed it's legit is legit?

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are posted by their Instagram page: https://www.instagram.com/banksy/

I don't know if all their works are on there though

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Kind of funny for someone like Banksy to still have to join somewhere like Instagram.

[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I get your point, but if you're doing political activism, you need to meet the people where they are

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

People do know who he is.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Cut it out and send it to the Louvre Museum.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Or to Athens. You know both the birthplace of democracy and the origin of the stolen Elgin marbles.

They are owed an even larger apology due to the rape of democracy that's taken place.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

What, because we allowed women, commoners and slaves the vote?

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Mainly because of the 'philosopher king' infringement tbh.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] klu9@piefed.social 52 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Nitpick: it's Parliament who proscribed Palestine Action, not the courts.

[–] Boo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 94 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It is the courts upholding it though.

It took like two months now that Palestine Action are allowed to get an appeals hearing in November iirc.
Courts could have decided for the proscription to not be applicable until a proper hearing takes place. Instead it was upheld.

Yea the decision to ban it went through so fast it was hard to have a defence, but the appeals are all delayed now they have one.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Cross nitpick: Just because the courts are following Parliament's 'law' in no way negates their complicity in doing wrong.

See Nazi guards following Hitler's rules for reference.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›