this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
844 points (99.0% liked)

Greentext

7098 readers
1505 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

They're trying to pivot to world domination.

Total enslavement of humanity, automated by their tech companies.

I'm not kidding. -_-

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 hours ago

Corporate welfare of course

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago

By that point the earth will be so polluted they will make profits by selling us clean air/02 in canisters, clean water, food an housing. Those of us that can't afford it will just die.

[–] Sektor@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

So poor people will become disposable?

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Solution: pay the politicians to declare a costly war, draft the poors, throw them into the meat grinder, they die off, AI owners profit by having everything be cheaper because all the poors died off.

[–] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Honestly there's no need because world population growth is declining anyways, so in a generation or two, even with AI, they're going to have the opposite problem.

[–] Ronno@feddit.nl 8 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Not just that, even as a company I would be seriously anxious when I know my business can be fully run by AI. That means that others can replicate your business very easily, which generates lots of competition, resulting in a race to the bottom. Which might even be good for consumers somehow.

[–] camelbeard@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

And as a second point, we all know that when companies or people depend on AI the price to use that AI will go up to the point where it is almost as expensive as having actual people doing the job. All these billions poured in AI need to be earned back, so now your business will fail unless you basically pay them whatever they ask.

[–] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

It will get to the point where they will simply take your business away or make you dependent through carrots and sticks or whatever.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 15 points 16 hours ago

These "people" in charge of corporations genuinely forgot that the workers they underpay are the consumers who they on rely to give them money.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Capitalism is a rabid dog, that only managed to serve the middle class well in the past because it was kept muzzled and on a tight leash.

Successive, and successful attempts to ‘unleash the beast’ have left us bit, and apologies for mixing metaphors here, but there is probably no way left, to get the genie back into the bottle:

Undoing 50+ years of damage would take time, especially when faced with resistance from those that stand to benefit most from the current broken system (think the Top 1% of the 1%), and that is time that we simply do not seem to have.

[–] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Dude I'm afraid this is just going to lead to the end of the world.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

For what it’s worth; the world will survive and adapt. Whether that means the extinction of humanity, is a whole separate matter altogether.

Our species entire existence is a mere blip compared to dinosaurs for an example.

[–] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Well, actually, our descendants will survive and adapt to the new Middle Ages when civilization collapses along with AI.

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 17 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Falling rate of profit by karl marx predicted this. Self destructive nature of capitalism

A socialist revolution is the only solution and it will come.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago

you'd think so, but what is being actually done to achieve this? As far as i have seen, people dont seem to have interest even in their own well being if it requires any attention span and they lap up any and all propaganda to the extent you are considered kind of crazy if you think corporations might not have your interests at their heart.

If the revolution is coming, it wont have any supporters because vast majority will just side with the corporations or plain not care. Not saying this to deter anyone from doing something but to point that winning back peoples minds is the first step that needs to be taken if anything is to be done at all.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

A socialist revolution is the only solution and it will come.

Not the only. The rich still can lead us to fascism. The only problem is that fascism has its own internal contradictions and history won't stop there.

[–] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

But the near-global technofascist dictatorship were on the threshold of is going to be vastly different than anything we've seen before. How do you resist a technological panopticon?

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

By smoking pot and breeding like rockstars

[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world 38 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The executives sell the corporate plane piece by piece while still in the air, then jump out in a golden parachute while the remains of the company nose dive to a fiery end.

[–] RealSpiderLane@lemmy.zip 17 points 23 hours ago

This; look at how short-term they’re already thinking.

They will see the writing on the wall long before they actually have any genuine fear for business. And they’ll take the money and run, just like they already do now.

[–] diptchip@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

The greedy would be considered mentally ill if logic could dictate. They care more about what they own than how others think of them. They can't take it with 'em.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

The closest thing to an endgame in capitalism is slavery.

[–] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Oh, by the way, there could be quite an interesting slavery where people become peasants again with cheap identification marks on their bodies like cattle, like tattoos, and there will also be biometrics.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 20 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Oh, you have no idea. If you don’t have a job (or 5), then you’re going to prison for being a vagrant. Or they do some dystopian shit where you are in the equivalent work labor camp, where you are provided basic life necessities in exchange for paying off your debt by working based on your skills. No skills? Manual labor in farms or construction.

People really have no idea what we’re complacently walking into. If you’re not rich, and I mean a few million american dollarooos or trump bucks… say next 10 years…? You’re fucked.

[–] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

You're damn right, in that case it's better to gather a group of people and go build villages far away from civilization and live in them so that these bastards with their drones don't get us.

Well, if people remain in civilization, some will be led to the slaughter, and others will be forced to take the mark like cattle, and they will be like sheep awaiting slaughter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 26 points 23 hours ago (11 children)

Kill off all of the poors they no longer need and live in a utopia being served by robots.

[–] Kvoth@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

The time machine by hg Wells. The rich force the poor underground into manual labor until both evolve and the poor start eating the rich

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] OmegaSunkey@ani.social 4 points 16 hours ago

isnt that the plot of wall-e

[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The idea is just to get there first. If you make it one quarter before your competition then you get a a really good quarter.

Long terms plans don't matter to CEOs. Long term stability is not rewarded by capitalism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cnlwhs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 20 hours ago
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nobody is thinking beyond next quarter.

[–] Sektor@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

China does.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

What's funny is that virtually everyone acknowledges it. Even Trump acknowledges it when he said that "China thinks in decades". But the Western capitalist culture is too strongly ingrained that the instinct to be greedy overrides any rational sense.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 5 points 18 hours ago

i find it especially grating that the people who parrot things like "give a man a fish / teach a man to fish" are the same people who will sell off company land and buildings to a landlord who then charges them rent for it, because "wAOW LOOK HOW MANY MONEYS WE MADE IN THE QUARTER WHERE WE SOLD ALL OUR SHIT!"

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It is all a con. There is no endgame. They aren't thinking that far ahead. And when the reality hits them it will land on them like a cartoon piano. They'll never see it coming.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] philosloppy@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

the short-term plan is to slurp up all the stuff while they can. The long term plan is that there is no place for plebs in the automated future. The unwritten prologue to their sci-fi adventure is us commoners being abandoned to starve on a poisoned and resource-depleted mud ball as the intrepid billionaires go off to explore the cosmos with their robot pals.

[–] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago

Well, these billionaires won't survive long in space, and AI is a voracious thing. If the world's population drops to 1 billion or less, it will save their asses for 50-200 years at most, and then they will all probably die or create digital copies of themselves that will also disappear. Honestly, I have no idea.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Honestly you're giving them way too much credit. There's no long-term plan. They're incapable of having long-term plans. Most these people can't think past next quarter.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You pay me $10 to punch you in the face. I pay you $10 to kick me in the balls. We just increased our country's GDP by $20.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›