this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
202 points (97.6% liked)

News

32054 readers
2114 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

After Mark Zuckerberg told President Trump that Meta would invest $600 billion by 2028, the CEO confessed to the president that he 'wasn't sure what number [Trump] wanted to go with.'

It's not unusual for tech company CEOs to make the journey to Washington, DC, and announce billion-dollar investments to curry favor with politicians in power. Apple CEO Tim Cook was in the Oval Office last month, a piece of Apple-shaped glass and a 24-karat gold base in hand, to pledge another $100 billion in US investment over the next four years, for a total of $600 billion.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg perhaps had that number on his mind this week when he joined his fellow Silicon Valley heavy hitters at the White House for a dinner with President Trump. Zuckerberg was seated next to the president, who at one point leaned over and asked him, "How much are you spending, would you say, over the next few years?"

A flustered Zuckerberg responded, "Oh gosh, um, I mean, I think it's probably going to be something like, at least $600 billion through '28 in the US, yeah."

"That's a lot, that's a lot," Trump said.

It is indeed. Once the discussion concluded, Zuckerberg leaned over to Trump to privately admit the president had caught him off guard. "I'm sorry I wasn't ready...I wasn't sure what number you wanted to go with," Zuckerberg said in a revealing moment caught on a hot mic.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] carlossurf@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

Guaranteed normal people wont see a cent of that

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 96 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not unusual for tech company CEOs to make the journey to Washington, DC, and announce billion-dollar investments to curry favor with politicians in power.

It should be. It has always been disgusting how normalized corruption is in this country. It's not surprising or shocking, but it's no less wrong.

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago

We are only as low as we are in corruption rankings because we legalized it. PACs lobbying etc

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 28 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Rolling blackouts, coal ash dumped into drinking water reservoirs, fossil fuel smog thick in the air, clearcut forests that would help clean the air, and "safer nuclear,” oh and peak oil was a while ago... Rationed water that may but likely won't, be safe for cooking, drinking or bathing...but ai surveillance and eternal war are worth it!

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 minutes ago

If you haven't heard, coal ash, fly ash, isn't really a thing anymore since they discovered that the ash, similar to volcanic ash, can act as a pozzolan and be used 1:1 to replace carbon intensive Portland cement for concrete, up to half off the cement mix. Since then the ash that is now valuable has been used for that instead of just being dumped. The old stuff in ponds is less useful but might be used after some light processing.

https://www.thespruce.com/fly-ash-applications-844761

https://www.concrete.org/frequentlyaskedquestions/faqid/688.aspx

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 hours ago

"safer nuclear,”

Why the "air quotes"? Nuclear remains the most efficient, powerful energy source, and is vastly more resilient to disaster than even before.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

but ai surveillance and eternal war are worth it!

Don't forget the thrill going up every confederate's leg because they owned the libs!

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

Wouldn't this be soo much easier if we just charged them all a proper amount in taxes?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] hector@lemmy.today 10 points 16 hours ago

Mark cuckerberg with our supreme dicktaster.

[–] ronigami@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

Always was. Hyuk hyuk

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trying to understand.

At the meeting - when interviewed by the press - Zuck mentioned 600b.

Then - after that questionnaire between Zuck and the press was over – he leaned over to Trump and was like – paraphrasing: “was 600b good? Don’t recall if that’s what we discussed”.

I’m assuming this is a bit of non-news - but am just trying to follow why it is news. Or if every hot mic capture is just juicy news.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Proof that these announcements are bs for the sheep. We already know that but the sheep do not.

600 b is more than the intrinsic value of zucksempire, not a chance they invest that, and if they did it would be for stuff that would make them more at our expense.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

600 b is more than the intrinsic value of zucksempire

There is no such thing as intrinsic value.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 8 points 14 hours ago

There is though, the real assets that have value, the time value of future earnings from their assets minus a risk premium.

Market value is what is a worthless number in most all contexts outside of hostile takeovers and arbitrage plays on valuations by parasitical private equity and hedge funds.

For instance, tesla owns properties, machines, can turn out so many cars for how much with whatever risk of not.

Meaning they might have an intrinsic value of 10 billion, probavly less now with the whole nazi thing.

Market cap of a trillion for tesla is meaningless, that money does not exist, realizing actual money from the stock progressively lowers the value.

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)

trump was getting these tech ceos to say big investment numbers into the camera so that trump could say that he is the greatest president ever. The estimate that zuck gave was very high, and the fact that he later said ‘was 600b good?’ In the ‘hot mic’ moment suggests that the number was inflated to appease trumps ego and that these numbers are not real.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

I would say it wasn't to appease trump himself, but to influence the people watching this.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Next week Facebook will layoff a couple thousand workers and then the elites will see the markets tumble and be like "wtf America, why are you doing this to yourself?"

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Heavy Hitters" that's cute for a bunch of flesh light pussies.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 22 hours ago

I really hope the Internet invents a parody product that embodies that fully, The Fasc White® fleshlight. Bundle it with tiki torches and a Best Buy ensemble so these backbirths go into battle with full hands.