this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
158 points (89.9% liked)

History Memes

362 readers
987 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
158
Crossdisciplinary (media.piefed.social)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by PugJesus@piefed.social to c/historymemes@piefed.social
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry Pug, I have to down vote for the awful and distracting censorship. I know you likely aren't the one who did it, but damn is it hard to read because of it.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

S'alright, I get it. If I'm too lazy to hunt down the original (and I absolutely am too lazy), I deserve the downvote.

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well now I feel bad. At the very least it was a good find.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah, don't feel bad, I got no shame about being lazy.

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Like to see some quality accountability around here, refreshing honestly.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 54 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I find the censoring so distracting that if this weren't so interesting I would've never been able to keep reading

[–] scrion@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thank you, I was just about to comment the same. Was this posted for toddlers? Is there not enough censorship already? Are we self-censoring now?

[–] addie@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago

Picture will have been screen-grabbed from a site that doesn't allow swears. What would the internet be, if it wasn't just screenshots of the same four sites, shared between them?

"A picture of text" is less accessible than "text as text" - harder for a screen-reader to convert it to audio, or to automatically translate it. Bit of a flaw of lemmy to only show the first paragraph-or-so of a text-only article, which means picture posts will keep turning up.

[–] KurtVonnegut@mander.xyz 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

For the sake of transparency: fucking, fuck, fucked, shit.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can't just fucking swear on this good Christian comm

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

We're not christian yet! We're barely out of the Julian era!

[–] neutronbumblebee@mander.xyz 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

With the leatherworking example this article below provides details and source. Except for the asking a leatherworker bit which seems inaccurate. The scientists actually made new experimental copies of the tools to confirm what the bones were used for based on the wear to surfaces. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/aug/12/neanderthals-invented-tool-leather-lissoir. They did note that "Similar tools, called slickers or burnishers, are still in use by leather workers today, meaning the instruments may be the only known examples of modern tools that owe their existence to our ancient Neanderthal relatives.

"There's a good case to be made for Neanderthals inventing this one aspect of modern human technology," said Shannon McPherron at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig. "It's the first time we've seen Neanderthals use bone in a way that uses its unique properties."

"These bone tools are identical in outline, profile, and use-wear to lissoirs. Lissoirs are known from the early Upper Paleolithic of western Europe including the Châtelperronian, Proto-Aurignacian and Aurignacian but are also found in the late Upper Paleolithic through to historic and modern time periods Lissoirs have a standardized shape and vary in size depending on the species used; they are an effective tool for producing and smoothly shifting pressure over a small area"

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 21 points 3 days ago

My personal favorite

And the journals quickly recognized her expertise. John Humphrey, the editor of the Journal of Roman Archaeology told the Wall Street Journal: ”I could tell even from the first version that it was a very serious piece of experimental archaeology which no scholar who was not a hairdresser—in other words, no scholar—would have been able to write.”

Interests, professions, hobbies, and traditions all bring valuable insight that cannot be ignored in historical research. For archeologists and historians, to reach out to a specialist is wisdom; to have a specialist reach out to you is a blessing.

The editor, casually reading the paper and then realizing that 100+ years of translators have fucked up because they weren't also hairdressers

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We still don't know what those knobby holed dodecahedrons are for

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Butt stuff.

[–] Jimbo@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Send this to the guys outfitting units with the M7

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

Trying to tell whoever is in charge of procurement in the US military "If it ain't broke, don't fix it"?

A Herculean task!