this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
12 points (92.9% liked)

worldnews

2818 readers
1 users here now

Welcome! This community is constantly upgrading and is a current work in progress. Please stay tuned.

/c/Worldnews@sh.itjust.works strives for high-quality standards on the latest world events.

The basis of these standards comes from the MBFC, which uses an aggregate of methodologies, including the IFCN and World Freedom Indices, to rate the Bias and Factual Reporting of News.

These are non-profit organisations with full transparency of their funding and structure. Likewise, this community is also transparent – Please feel free to question its staff and the overall content of this community.


Does your post fit the standards? Check this thread!



Rules:


Disallowed submissions

Commenters will receive one public warning with only one strike if violating any of the following rules:

Thank you.

todo list:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Waffle 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Ultra Violette's Lean Screen SPF 50+ Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen, a facial product that Rach says she used exclusively, was the "most significant failure" identified. It returned a result of SPF 4, something that shocked Choice so much it commissioned a second test that produced a similar reading.

Other products that did not meet their SPF claims included those from Neutrogena, Banana Boat, Bondi Sands and the Cancer Council - but they all rejected Choice's findings and said their own independent testing showed their sunscreens worked as advertised.

[–] _core@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

"we've investigated ourselves and found us to be right"

[–] _core@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

A lot of the sunscreen companies using the same US based testing company strongly indicates it gave fraudulent results and that the companies knew this.