this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
187 points (97.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34457 readers
1551 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Whether big or small. We all have that one thing from Scifi we wished were real. I'd love to see a cool underground city with like a SkyDome or a space hotel for instance.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rowinxavier@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Post capitalism.

We have automation for so much manufacturing. We have solar energy which is basically free after manufacture. We could spend a fairly small amount of time really working towards automating most resource extraction and processing.

We could have a really good standard of living not just in the west but globally and we could in the process resolve the threats of climate change but instead we have billionaires.

[–] PodPerson@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think if we had the tech to make replicators (Trek), we would easily be able to go full on post-cap, as that would essentially end hunger, our over extraction of earth’s resources, landfills, recycling, people not being able to afford basics like groceries, etc. I think we have the capability to do that now without that tech, but as a species, lack the will and compassion.

[–] rowinxavier@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

From what I have read there is no physical reason that we could not all have a reasonable standard of living right now with no extra technology. The reason for poverty is not a scarcity if resources, it is a distribution problem. Some people take too much and use systems like law and governance to enforce their relative position. Ditching individual wealth would solve most of the issues which prevent a good life for everyone. Being as most wars are ultimately about wealth and the same for borders it would be revolutionary.

[–] psion1369@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think a moon colony was possible at minimum the mid 90's. I only think bureaucracy got in the way along with a very stunted space shuttle.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Agreed, a lot of sci-fi infastructure is technically feasable its just the logistics and our lack of organisation as a species that gets in the way. We could also technically start on a dyson swarm and a lunar space elevator (not an earth one though) with modern technology and materials.

[–] psion1369@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I'm glad to see that we are moving forward with it, I just would rather it not be by Elon. But he has the tools to get it done.

[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca 77 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] astanix@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As long as shareholder value is the number one thing it just cant happen.

[–] rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio 32 points 2 days ago

OP says, "with our current current level of technology."

We have the technology to overcome any logistics issue pertaining to eliminating scarcity (and by extension, poverty). What we lack is the societal structure.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

so kill the shareholders, then they won't care about their value.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Hemp as a replacement for plastics and synthetic materials. Food packaging shouldn't have a longer shelf life than it's contents.

Sunchips was using PLA, which is a step in the right direction.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

Ah yes ... The Thunderbags™... You were not sneaking any snacks around those things.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We could be solarpunk. Like, right now. With everything using clean energy and plants everywhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 10 points 2 days ago

Library economy.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I don't forking understand why in 2025, taking pills is still the only way for me to get better for some illness. As someone who gets pretty bad anxiety about taking pills and who sometimes almost chokes on them, I seriously can't understand how we have pocket PCs but we don't have a way to just treat things without pills. Hell, I'll drink something that tastes horrible if it means I don't gotta test my gag reflex.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 222 points 3 days ago (4 children)
[–] smegger@aussie.zone 101 points 3 days ago (1 children)

RELIABLE public transport. I guess that's too sci-fi

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] M137@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Oh look, another 'Murican "only the US exists" type comment.

Public transportation is common worldwide.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Only the things scifi wanted to warn us about.

We already live in dystopia timelie.

[–] KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Telemetry free consumer products would be nice

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm on board with ethical and opt-in telemetry. Knowing how your users interact with your app is very useful, but not many companies can show restraint when money is involved.

[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

If my data was used to refine and improve the products and services I interact with I'd be fine with it but as it stands it's just used to help make my life hell and exploit my existence for cash.

[–] weirdbeardgame@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

100% this. Telemetry and market research are fine. Hell Some opt in, totally 100% disableable targeted ads are fine as long as they're not excessive and in the way. Flagrant selling of info however, does not spark joy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GhostPain@lemmy.world 115 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Socialized healthcare. A living minimum wage. UBI.

A permanent base on the moon. We should have had that 40 years ago, minimum.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

The moon base (and/or moon orbit base) isn't just cool, it would facilitate building ships in space that don't have to escape the gravity well. That and asteroid mining (to get materials for ship building) would be such a huge step to having a real presence off-planet.

Mine materials on asteroids, send them to the moon refinery and manufacturing facility, send parts up to lunar orbital ship building facility, send ships to Europa, Ganymede, etc.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Roof-top gardens everywhere! Like the launch arcologies in SimCity 2000. They looked cool as fuck.

[–] PlexSheep 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Plants on buildings bring some architectural and safety challenges, depending on how large they are. You need to somehow get dirt and water up, and the dirt can be pretty heavy. If something falls down into the ground it could hit someone and injured them. And also, with time, roots could lessen the structural integrity of a building.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No doubt, but I love the aesthetic

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

If you love underground, the world is your rooftop garden!

[–] MissingInteger@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago

A moonbase.

[–] arararagi@ani.social 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I never stopped dreaming about flying cars, I just think it's not gonna happen because a crash would easily kill people just sitting in their homes.

[–] PlexSheep 14 points 2 days ago

I am grateful everyday that cars cannot fly.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

Helicopters exist, they are expensive, loud, require pilot training and skill, and still crash sometimes.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Compared to aviation, road vehicles have virtually no structured regulations.

Even road rules are considered optional by many drivers. Lots of people drive without a licence.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Abolishing the concept of money. Probably won't happen but it would be pretty cool.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 73 points 3 days ago (8 children)

the end of scarcity. that's a totally bogus concept that capitalism uses to keep the rich in power. we produce far more than the whole of humanity would need to feed and cloth themselves, and we have more houses empty than there are families. we could end poverty right now, we just choose not to.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Here is something we don't have that I think we could: Automated vegetable farming.

I've seen these watering gantries that are fixed at the center of a circular field and then rotate radially around that point to water the field. Could you use that as a rail with an effector arm on it that can plant, weed, tend, fertilize and harvest the field, such that in goes seeds and out comes vegetables? Without the liability of free roaming robotic tractors and combine harvesters. Surely the issue here would be software.

[–] Yaky@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Those are called pivots, and what you are saying seems plausible: there are vision algorithms to recognize and selectively spray weeds (see Bilberry ), recent prototypes with light-pressure grabbers to gather fruits and soft vegetables.

Even for harvesters, there are projects to automate harvesting and swapping the grain trucks (see Outrun ). GPS-guided (or assisted) tractors are already a thing.

Agriculture has some interesting innovations, but it often gets bogged down in corporate acquisitions and monetization.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm into hydroponics as a hobby grower and there are certain techniques for veggie growing that are set and forget. You plant and harvest only, no weeding, no watering. As far as I understand, traditional techniques are still cheaper though

I'm into vegetable gardening as a hobby, my land is essentially beach sand, the only thing that grows in the local dirt is tetanus, so I grow in raised beds and import or make all of my soil. What kind of hardware and rigging does a hydroponic garden take?

[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 47 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Arcologies.

Dense housing with good soundproofing, atop commercial space, in a walkable neighborhood.

Wouldn't need rent control if there was more houses.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 66 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Universal healthcare and living wages for everyone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Brain operated electronics.

Eeg headbands detect brainwaves and are used in diagnosing mental illnesses. There is also expensive portable ones for yoga people that track your sleep cycle and give statistics.

You can VERY easily have it change the TV channel or move player in a VR game. In fact there is an old starwars toy where you lift some ball by powering a hairdryer with your brainwaves for like $40.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago
[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Augmented reality overlaying historical photos and 3d models so you can literally see history as your walking.

Imagine being able to visit The White City that was built for the World's Fair in Chicago. Or seeing New York before sky scrapers dominated the landscape.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

While you're admiring a building which was there in 1925, you get run over by a car which is there in 2025.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

AR. Being able to just pop into someone's AR world and walk around as if I was in tge same physical location.

Bikes/Ebikes/motorcycles replacing cars for single-person transport in cities.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago (11 children)

The viewscreen from Star Trek. It's actually real but nobody really wants to use it.

Phones, tablets, and laptops have had video chat for years. Apple brought it to actual TV a couple years ago. The idea is you use the Apple TV set-top box, and you get a squared-S-shaped clip that mounts an iPhone to the top of a TV so the rear camera array can point out into the room. You pair the two, and your whole TV turns into a viewscreen, just like on the starship Enterprise.

I've explained this to a few people and the reaction is usually "okay why TF would I wanna do that?" So imagine a Thanksgiving or Christmas, or other "big family holiday" thing where you have that one person who won't participate because it's their partner's family's turn to see the kids or whatever... so, the Apple TV is like $100. And somebody is gonna have an iPhone. And these days, everyone has a TV, at least in the west, and they're 55" or bigger. So you get the TV in the corner of the room and you set it up so you're broadcasting the whole living room and maybe part of the kitchen or dining room, and you connect it to another family/part of the family who is doing the same. And your TV is now a window into that other living room, and people can go up to the screen and interact, or wave from across the room. Now if it's like Thanksgiving and it's based around eating, you could even run the end of the table up to the TV (so the TV is basically sat at one end of the table with no one in between) on both sides so when you look down the table, you're looking into that other room.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›