this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
519 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

74945 readers
2928 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

probably because i dont even care about 1080p tvs. they all look the same.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And of course the comment section with "16k around the coner, progress doesn't stop".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 5 points 6 days ago

I want 8K TVs, but only when there's abundant native 8K content to watch on it - otherwise there is no point.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'd buy a 8k TV, provided that it has no smarts, no WiFi, no TV tuner and its price isn't over 5% than a 4k TV

load more comments (2 replies)

I’d buy one if it came with every David Attenborough (or similar) nature documentary included. I don’t need 8k for games or movies or anything else but I’ll watch the shit out of whatever high budget nature documentaries are produced and put my nose against the screen to see the critter details.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 6 days ago

I can't even see the difference between 1080p and 4k.

[–] harcesz@szmer.info 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, and 640kb RAM Ought to be Enough for Anyone.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I hear anything at or above 8k resolution negates the need for anti aliasing entirely... But I feel that my pc would would be running at or around 10-15 fps for most games I would care about anti aliasing on.

Nice in theory, definitely can't handle that many pixels in reality.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I'll take one! Well, two really. One large one for TV/media viewing and one to replace my 43" 4k monitor. Quadrupling the resolution on that would be amazing.

The difference would be minimal on the media screen, TBH, but Ive seen them in person and can tell the difference. It's just not a big enough difference to warrant replacing what I have.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

LASIK actually made a huge difference in being able to appreciate the sharpness of 4K, but I doubt 8K is as big a leap.

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago (3 children)

4k is nice but at 1440p the diminishing returns are pretty obvious doubt 8k is somehow going to change that

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›