this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
22 points (75.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1571 readers
11 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://lemmy.ml/post/35472063

The original post is about a supposedly privacy focused keyboard that sends your voice and messages to OpenAI for speech to text. I posted saying I use the FUTO Keyboard as it's open source and does voice to text on-device. There unsued a discussion about if the FUTO Keyboard is open source, as the license prohibits commercial use. After people sharing thoughts on this for a day, the mods removed the thread for being offtopic and promoting proprietary software. Even if you think that the license prohibiting commercial use makes it not open source, it certainly doesn't make it proprietary.

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SwooshBakery624@programming.dev 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I posted saying I use the FUTO Keyboard as it's open source

It is not.

Even if you think that the license prohibiting commercial use makes it not open source, it certainly doesn't make it proprietary.

It does. If the license doesn't meet the OSD and the FSD, then it is proprietary, because,

“Proprietary software is another name for nonfree software.” - Categories of Free and Nonfree Software.

YDI.

[–] Blaze@lazysoci.al 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

~~Seems to be a misunderstanding on their part about the license?~~

Edit: seems like the mods indeed checked the licence

In any case, !privacy@programming.dev is the second most active community on the topic

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 months ago

YDI, should have read the sidebar. If it doesn't allow for the four essential freedoms or whatever the OSI definition is, then it's proprietary software.

Source available proprietary software != free/libre software!

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

I use Heliboard, an actually open source keyboard

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Perhaps "source available" is a more apt term for this kind of license

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

Source available proprietary software

[–] thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

"proprietary bullshit"

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I suppose I was today years old when I learned that the general consensus among software people is that proprietary software means software with any restrictions, not just software which is entirely black-boxed.

I was unaware of any ongoing conflict about FUTO and thought that it was a widely supported alternative