448
Trump says he plans unconstitutional executive order to mandate ID for voters
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
448 points (98.7% liked)
News
37047 readers
2705 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Keep going
Can he just go back to being dead?
that photo is from tuesday. not sure he ain't
He can fuck on off. That’s up to the States.
And admission to the capital is up to the don now.
load more comments
(4 replies)
I like the way the headline implies that he openly admitted that the order would be unconstitutional.
He'll be dead before the next election.
Bet your house on it.
No thanks, betting against this man hasn't worked out for me yet, and I'm much too poor to spare the roof over my head when reality bends over backwards to appease this man again.
You guys own houses?
I do but only by right of conquest. Or whatever it's called when your parents die and leave you the house they had their parents help them get.
load more comments
(3 replies)
House owning guys are betting on shit,,get in
load more comments
(1 replies)
Grant imahara who actually had something to give to this world died in his '50s unexpectedly from an aneurysm.
Don't bet your fucking life on it with how karma doesn't work
Yeah, because there won't be another election while that shit stain is still alive
load more comments
(3 replies)
Cool, and he also will release the unredacted Epstein files like he promised.
Only if we beat it from him like a pinata.
Why not both?
So sick of just one fucking asshole in this country able to torment millions of us.
The use of executive orders to rule by decree is itself unconstitutional.
Um, so this IS the party of "small government", yes?
Hey Donny, that's great and all, but where are the Epstein files? Inquiring minds need to know!
You don't have to have proof of identity to vote in the US?
In states that do not require an ID, you still need to present a document with your name. It is then compared with the voter registration database. The argument against requiring an ID is that ID's aren't free in the US, which can cause a financial hurdle for many.
Sounds like a solution would be some sort of national ID card provided for free?
Republicans and conservatives, historically, have been the biggest opponents of a national ID because they don't want the federal government tracking them or asserting any control over anything.
Until trump, anyway...
load more comments
(1 replies)
Yes, but that would actually be a good thing so it's never happened.
And there's additional hurdles for more targeted populations, like access to the place that gives you the ID, and the capacity to prove your ID to that place with specific documents that may ormay not exist. It's on purpose.
Heck, personal ID is not free in my country, either (I paid 43€ for a renewal last week), but it is mandatory, so everyone has it. Americans could do it even cheaper if they wanted.
With so low levels of identity proof in the US, don't complain about identity theft. Here, you simply can't open a bank account with just an SSN drawn from the darknet and a self-printed electricity bill. Having a proper ID has many uses, way beyond identifying for your right to vote.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Papers please
Glory to Arstotzka.
I have. Is all good, yes?
EOs arnt laws.. Congress still has to make them into laws.
There's the legal tactic of: do now and ask for forgiveness never. It works really well when there are no legal consequences.
It works really well when there are no legal consequences.
There are other consequences than legal ones.
none so far i would say.
But it isn't even a legal tactic. EOs mean nothing. They are not laws.
They obviously mean something until they are stuck down, and even then...
Yup, flood the courts and demand appeals whenever judges block things. The goal is to overwhelm the system in the short term. While judges and lawyers are busy setting court dates that are weeks away, the regime will carry on as if the EO is legal.
I Will Be Doing An Executive Order
President of the United States.
Trump is way too fucking lazy to press the shift key before every word. I just do not believe that he writes his own tweets. I'd like to see just one video of him visibly typing out a tweet that is then published. I'd bet that if you cross-referenced when his tweets are posted with his golf schedule, you'd find that at least some of them are written by somebody else.
Can we 100% confirmed that Donny actually made this statement and that it wasn’t a body double? And also RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES.
Also there will be underwear inspections and all underwear must now be worn on the outside of pants.
This was the plan for the "Real ID" all along
He does care fuck if it is "legal" or "constitutional". Those terms do no longer exist as criteria.
I'm very ill.
I can't see California ever enforcing this
Soviet Anthem Intensifies
view more: next ›