this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
15 points (94.1% liked)

Selfhosted

51862 readers
556 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Question to all the experienced folks here:

I'm restructuring my home setup to have the following

  • NAS, likely truenas, lots of storage, with shares to hold all data like photos and Linux iso's
  • small server, probably proxmox with Ubuntu vm, running most of the services (reverse proxy, oidc server, pw manager, etc)

The 2 services I'm indecisive about are nextcloud and jellyfin, since they directly rely on the big files. Would you run them directly on the nas, or on the vm with volumes mounted over the network?

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

I'd upgrade the NAS to full server status and run everything from there. For most people, there's not much point in separate devices. It just adds a point of failure.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago

Either works fine for most homes. for most homes everything on the nas makes sense as that saves energy vs a second always on box. For enterprises you want them separate because you can't get cpu's powerful enough.

[–] GreatBlue 3 points 1 month ago

If I had a dedicated NAS and a server for the services, I would choose the consistent path and keep it separated. So I would run nextcloud and jellyfin on the server and let them access storage on the NAS.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

I run separate systems - OMV-based NAS for storage, and a small Proxmox cluster that runs all of my services.

The NAS provides NFS mounts for any relevant service. Works fine.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I keep my Linux ISOs on mergerfs over NFS via open media vault. All of them are easily replaced so I don't bother backing them up.

Nextcloud, paperless, and photos get their whole image backed up on proxmox local, and a remote PBS. I'm the only user so the sizes are quite manageable.

[–] theit8514@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

With TrueNas you can do it two ways: ISCSI disks that are mounted to the VMs or via NFS. With ISCSI you won't have access to the data from the TrueNas side as the data will be stored as a volume file. With NFS you get the best of both worlds as you'll be able to access the files via other TrueNas services like SMB/SFTP. I have my Jellyfin/Plex running via NFS and have few issues, though I've not tested it with large 4k/8k videos yet. I mostly run 1080p.