this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
191 points (97.0% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historymemes@piefed.social

3484 readers
1 users here now

THIS COMM HAS MOVED

!historymemes@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 53 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

"Let's give a teenager complete autocratic power, what could go wrong"

[wild parties ensue]

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago

“With Trump, it’s like there’s a child in the White House!”

An actual child in the White House: weekly Minecraft LAN parties

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 34 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Let’s not lose sight of who wrote that: his detractors in the Senate. They had every reason to delegitimize and demonize him

[–] froufox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i see no demonization in the points listed

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

A conservative Roman senate would

[–] xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Imperator Caesar Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Augustus

They literally just mushed all the greats' names together. How often does this happen?

[–] huppakee@feddit.nl 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In Spanish language places a lot of people are called jesus, in Islamic places a lot of people are called Mohammed. I'm not saying i think it is a normal thing to do, but history disagrees with me. People have been name-dropping any way they can for ages now.

[–] xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

True but how is it more like "Vishnu Abraham Hesus Muhammad de Buddha" or specifically among Roman emperors.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Constantly. Most Roman Emperors adopted the names of previous Emperors to show how part of the 'imperial family' they were.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

I can't help but think that second-to-last bullet point, especially taken together with the last one, would have been ill-advised given ancient Roman surgical capabilities.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Of course they were killed by the Praetorian Guard.

[–] Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca -5 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I like the sentiment, but they were underage for most of there reign (14-18) so kinda ick to sexualize them

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 51 points 2 months ago

What? No one is sexualizing them, they were sexual. They had 4 wives. They had a reputation for "sexual promiscuity". This information is directly from the linked Wikipedia article.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

“I never wanted a meme sexualizing a teenager.”

“How about a meme validating a teenager?”

“Aye, that I can do.”

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 months ago

You can go complain to the ancient historians from whom we got the "sexualised" story of Elagabalus...

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 14 points 2 months ago

Did puberty hit you at 18?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 12 points 2 months ago

it's impossible to sound like a well-adjusted human that is allowed in polite society when saying this but i still feel it has to be said: the meaning of "underage" is a legal one, not a biological one, and it varies a lot across the world. in my country, we commonly call people turning 15 "pants-age" (bad translation) because it's the age of consent. that's just normal here.

assuming the rest of the world, especially when going back through history, shares 21st century north american sensibilities is not helping anyone.

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 months ago

bro had a boring teenage time :(