this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
4 points (83.3% liked)

news

71 readers
400 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A kg of Methane emitted has a 84kg CO2 equivalent.
The estimated environmental and social costs per ton of emitted CO2 is in the range of 200€.

84 * 0.014t * 500,000 * 200€/t= 117 million €

This means that the costs to society would have exceeded 100 million € if it had not catched fire and exploded.

So, unintuitive as it may seem, the overall cost to society has probably been lower because the pipeline exploded and not just leaked without catching fire...

Nonetheless, still tragic for the people directly affected by the explosion. I read that the government at least gave money for the rebuilding of the homes.