What a terrible system. I have a couple of computers where the vendor provides good update support, but for most of them this is not the case and you're pretty much stuck with the firmware you get. To tie Secure Boot to such a flaky set of distribution channels seems like very poor planning.
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
54 points (98.2% liked)
Linux
13143 readers
1004 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Or it's on purpose to force the purchase of new hardware.
It is always about the money.
@floofloof @cm0002 Poor planning my ass. This was the plan all along. They [expletive] know what they are doing.
Would this not also be an issue for Windows users? Or is the Windows boot loader signed with a different key?