this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
54 points (98.2% liked)

Linux

13123 readers
637 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What a terrible system. I have a couple of computers where the vendor provides good update support, but for most of them this is not the case and you're pretty much stuck with the firmware you get. To tie Secure Boot to such a flaky set of distribution channels seems like very poor planning.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Or it's on purpose to force the purchase of new hardware.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 7 months ago

It is always about the money.

[–] khleedril@cyberplace.social 1 points 7 months ago

@floofloof @cm0002 Poor planning my ass. This was the plan all along. They [expletive] know what they are doing.

[–] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago

Would this not also be an issue for Windows users? Or is the Windows boot loader signed with a different key?