this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
305 points (93.9% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1967 readers
415 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Excuse me while I go donate even more money to PieFed

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (19 children)

Not sure I dig baking it into the code, that starts walking into the broken by design space. Feasibly the tankies developing Lemmy could do the same to any instance not painted the right shade of red.

I might propose instead a step in setup, or on demand, to select major instances to allow/deny federation from with a description of them. Impossible to keep a list of every new instance up to date, but catching the major hubs shouldn't be impossible.

Edit: For all those who replied along the lines of it being optional not a hard coded block, point noted. I should expect no less misleading a post from a pool of people prone to leaving out vital facts.

My understanding as it being an opt-out default defederation is still a bit grating since I tend to think of software as a neutral tool rather than promoting specific ideals, but it's far better than a fixed in state and does serve some purpose to shield new users from some of the most egregiously bad actors.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 9 points 23 hours ago

It's just a default ban that can be turned off if desired.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 10 points 1 day ago

I don’t know if this is the answer, but it sure sounds like a step in the right direction.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fediverse wide

Do they think they have influence beyond the ML instances?

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 19 points 1 day ago

think

There is the error in the logic.

It's exhausting wasting effort on those that put none in.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

There's a lot of .ml users who make accounts on sjw and fail at radicalizing those users.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I mean I think that is a bad and unhealthy idea. If piefed.social, world or a particular instance wants to set it up that way then go ahead, sure, but I do think it should be up to the admin using the software to decide which servers this should or shouldn't apply to rather than what sounds like an opt-out scheme. I mean sure go ahead, code how you like, who am I to judge, but I'm only saying it in consideration of best practices.

If HB runs into the silly issue again that almost lost them their domain (and temporarily switched to chapo.chat), this code will be a maintenance burden just because of the developer's specific grudge.

I'm saying this as a user happy about the fact that my instance defederated hexbear and lemmygrad, there are cool communities there, but they are an insufferable bunch.

[–] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I believe they further clarified that there are specific default filter sets that can be loaded when a new piefed instance is created, not that they are literally removed in code.

Here's the comments discussing it:

[–] HackerJoe@sh.itjust.works 9 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

centrist extremists

can't make that shit up...

[–] blx@lemmy.zip 5 points 23 hours ago

I actually lol-ed at that

[–] socsa@piefed.social 4 points 22 hours ago

If I don't make it back, tell my wife... Hello.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why bother with the 1 way federation, though?

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So your users can go on their instance, I guess? That's not a great reason. Cut them off or don't.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Agreed, there is no good reason for a one way federation with a trash instance.

Even if the idea is that they have communities that aren't horrible, the taint is strong enough that the same communities should just be promoted on non/less shitty instances.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it’s the other way around, actually. It sounds like hex users are actually receiving posts from outside but it’s their own content that is being blocked

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

IMO, it's not great regardless of which direction it's going. Fuck ML'ers, but it isn't really necessary to create one-way engagement with them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago

What gets me is that their users are so smug. It's really off-putting.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ech@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Am I missing something? Aside from the "baked in" claim, how is this different from defeds on Lemmy? It's always one way, ie the instance that defeds can't see content from the other instance, but the target instance can still see them.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It is indeed the same, some comments in that thread make it look like some people discovered defederation today

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 5 points 22 hours ago

Ok, that's what I thought. Which is funny because I learned how it works after learning that hex admins (generally) defed mutually to avoid a one way issue, exactly like they're freaking out about here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good luck with that they/them in Russia.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it's fine, once in russia they will be in the communist utopia of their dreams, at which point all will join into one gestalt consciousness.

due to morality laws, that consciousness will be identify as a cis man.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›