this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
263 points (94.3% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1967 readers
465 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Excuse me while I go donate even more money to PieFed

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I'd say don't block anything at the top and let users filter their own feed as they see fit, except blocking communities is not very effective, in my experience.

More robust filtering and sorting for the user would be welcome. For instance, Reddit Enhancement Suite lets me hover over a name that has an "ignore" button for users, and a "filter" button for subs. That's very user-friendly and effective there. The same here would be a good addition.

I understand that the structure of Fediverse makes this more challenging.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 127 points 15 hours ago (9 children)

PieFed dev here.

The screenshotted post is very misleading. As you'd expect from a hexbearian. It is not a baked-in ban.

Hexbear is mentioned in the PieFed source code, as an initial default value for the defederation list. That list is quite long and includes various instances that have been a source of trolls, CSAM and spam in the past (mostly Mastodon instances). As part of the normal setup process it is assumed that instance admins will review that list and alter it as they see fit. They can change it any time by going to instance.tld/admin/federation.

Do not take anything a hexbearian says at face value.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

Correct me if I'm wrong, but this also wouldn't mean "one way federation" right? There would just be no synching at all.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

That's exactly what this is, an initial defed list. Even the way they present this is disingenous as fuck, calling it a "one way federation, silencing our voices" or some other weird phrasing, making it sound like some underhanded/hidden hardcoded piece just for them, when it's just a boring-ass defederation with one instance among many others. How difficult is it to say "piefed software defederates hexbear by default"? Everyone knows what that fucking means!

I honestly don't understand why everything has to be taken so goddamn uncharitably by the regulars on that instance. It blows my mind how they manage to always act in bad faith. Always.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I honestly don't understand why everything has to be taken so goddamn uncharitably by the regulars on that instance. It blows my mind how they manage to always act in bad faith. Always.

It's pretty straightforward, imo, they built a feedback loop into their insurance culture that encouraged social dopamine junkies to participate in toxic behaviors, valuing things like "dunking", othering, and dehumanizing the out group (non-hexies) over things like factuality, good faith, and not being dicks.

[–] Master@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago

Maybe you should bake it in then. Maybe you are not going far enough...

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 22 points 15 hours ago

Thank you for jumping in.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 16 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Based.

The only thing better than this was Nutomic whining that he needs more donations to feed his family (he literally said this) but absolutely refusing to just ask Dessalines to chill the fuck out with the tankie censorship shit.

[–] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 25 points 17 hours ago

It's just a default block on grad and hex when creating a new instance which can be toggled off. Keep coming crying with your ALTs Tankies no one wants to deal with your incessant propaganda.

[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

we need a fediverse-wide boycott of hexbear

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 27 points 19 hours ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 38 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (19 children)

Not sure I dig baking it into the code, that starts walking into the broken by design space. Feasibly the tankies developing Lemmy could do the same to any instance not painted the right shade of red.

I might propose instead a step in setup, or on demand, to select major instances to allow/deny federation from with a description of them. Impossible to keep a list of every new instance up to date, but catching the major hubs shouldn't be impossible.

Edit: For all those who replied along the lines of it being optional not a hard coded block, point noted. I should expect no less misleading a post from a pool of people prone to leaving out vital facts.

My understanding as it being an opt-out default defederation is still a bit grating since I tend to think of software as a neutral tool rather than promoting specific ideals, but it's far better than a fixed in state and does serve some purpose to shield new users from some of the most egregiously bad actors.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

You might want to take a look at this comment from a dev

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/21022924

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago

Sane defaults make self-hosting approachable.

[–] walden@wetshav.ing 6 points 10 hours ago

I might propose instead a step in setup, or on demand, to select major instances to allow/deny federation from

This is exactly how it works. I started a PieFed instance and made the decision (during setup) to trim the defederation list down to none. Users can block on the account level.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 8 points 17 hours ago

It's just a default ban that can be turned off if desired.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 29 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Fediverse wide

Do they think they have influence beyond the ML instances?

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 19 points 20 hours ago

think

There is the error in the logic.

It's exhausting wasting effort on those that put none in.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 15 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean I think that is a bad and unhealthy idea. If piefed.social, world or a particular instance wants to set it up that way then go ahead, sure, but I do think it should be up to the admin using the software to decide which servers this should or shouldn't apply to rather than what sounds like an opt-out scheme. I mean sure go ahead, code how you like, who am I to judge, but I'm only saying it in consideration of best practices.

If HB runs into the silly issue again that almost lost them their domain (and temporarily switched to chapo.chat), this code will be a maintenance burden just because of the developer's specific grudge.

I'm saying this as a user happy about the fact that my instance defederated hexbear and lemmygrad, there are cool communities there, but they are an insufferable bunch.

[–] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 14 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

I believe they further clarified that there are specific default filter sets that can be loaded when a new piefed instance is created, not that they are literally removed in code.

Here's the comments discussing it:

[–] HackerJoe@sh.itjust.works 10 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

centrist extremists

can't make that shit up...

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

Those are the liberals (the definition of a centrist imo, as opposed to a progressive who is the first notch on the left) who will gladly work across the aisle with a fascist to preserve democracy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›