this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
828 points (99.1% liked)

memes

17055 readers
2663 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 26 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Media viewer and the file browser are completely different programs with different support for media file types.

Not that this is an excuse for Media Viewer to not open webp files. Also asking you to pay for h265 support is extra ridiculous.

I just use VLC for everything.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 18 points 23 hours ago

They are made by the same company and sold as a unified software package under the name Windows 11 [edition]

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 15 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't have time to check all the comments, so here's a backup:

Just install GNU/Linux

;)

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

KDE Plasma let's me use .jxl files as my wallpaper. I can also take screenshots in .jxl.

[–] rustyricotta@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Same Plasma here. I'm using SHADERS as my background. Currently the Balatro menu shader.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rustyricotta@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago

It's literally just GLSL shader code. Procedurally generated animated background.

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The operating system support for JPEG XL is really there! By now even Windows supports it natively. Not only previews in the file manager, but also in the media viewer.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, I copied a .jxl over to my Windows 11 VM out of curiosity and was surprised to see it opened just fine.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 223 points 1 day ago (6 children)

This is MS we're talking about. Preview and Viewer are probably made by two different teams in different countries, sharing no code, and prohibited from communicating with each other, even if they know about the other's existence.

And famously they fired all QAs years ago so there's nobody to test before releasing.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

And famously they fired all QAs years ago so there's nobody to test before releasing.

It all makes sense now.

There's no QA to bonk people on the head.

Who the fuck's idea was Outlook (New)? Like half the features don't exist. And some of the actually useful new features simply don't work (looking at you," pop-out" reading pane view option. Where's my popped out reading pane Microsoft??? Did ya forget to test it? Turns out, yes)

[–] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 100 points 1 day ago

One leveraging the graphics engine from internet explorer the other using the graphics engine from ms paint 1.0

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The image viewer is probably just Edge in a trenchcoat by now.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I think way more of windows 11 is just edge in a trenchcoat than anyone wants to admit...

Can't get away from it at work and i hate it. All we need computers for at work is web access and file sharing, but they still won't budge from daddy Microsoft.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 22 hours ago

I wouldn't mind if all those Electron apps could use it to save space, but no. Everything still comes with 600MB of Chromium bolted to it like a tumour.

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 73 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

I work in big tech and this is my life. I envy anyone who thinks you're exaggerating, because that means they haven't experienced the joy of spending weeks trying to track down the team responsible for a bug and then months hassling them to fix it.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Oh, man.

I just stopped being hassled to fix a bug on somebody else's system (that mine interops with), by the same developers responsible for maintaining that other system, because the problem got bad enough to escalate until somebody responsible for both sides looked.

That said, I was just ignoring them. But hell...

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And if they do talk to each other, the different departments need to go through the whole hierarchy for everything and each manager puts their spin on it, so you get answers back from questions that were not asked.

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Here's a real and true story about how separate Microsoft teams communicate and coordinate:

Few weeks ago, some Microsoft team from the US deprecated some critical service used by other Microsoft products. They just shut it off without notifying anyone. Other teams from other Microsoft offices in the rest of the world found about this deprecation when their production builds started failing to log customers in to the applications that they need for their businesses. People were called in from their vacations, emergency meetings were held to play hot potato with responsibility. Clients were PISSED. I stopped following the drama before it was resolved.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

I loathe windows, but I did just double check because this sounds inept even for M$ -- Win photos will absolutely open .webp, but it's not the default program for whatever reason and it just defaults to edge / your_default_web_browser_here. Which is just impressively on brand for microsoft. Even when they have a feature they hide it to, idk, make themselves look even worse? Why not!

proof

(FWIW this is a clean install, I do not have any non-default codecs installed)

[–] gerald_eliasweb@reddthat.com 4 points 22 hours ago

THANK YOU. you just saved me so much time with the knowledge.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, it's sorted through WIC iirc. As long as you have the codec installed you should be able to open it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] shantismurf@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I know a bunch about computers and that doesn't add up to me either!! I hate the webp format.

[–] OboTheHobo@ttrpg.network 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Webp is honestly a really good format for what its made to do. That being said, windows support for it is lacking for some reason. I don't know why as it's been common for a long time now.

Also, you can always use ffmpeg to convert to png or jpg or whatever you want. Simple file conversions like that are super easy.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] trk@aussie.zone 25 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Irfanview is the answer.

I don't even know what the question was tbh, but I'm still right.

[–] shantismurf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Irfanview is always the answer!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 92 points 1 day ago (22 children)

Webp is the worst format ever.

Never mind that:

  • it supports transparency;
  • it can be losslessly OR lossfully compressed;
  • it's so efficient it can fit ẏ̷̛̀̏̎̇͜ǫ̷̼̰̳̹́̆̍̐͜͝ủ̷͉̱̻̤̬̯̈́ŗ̸̒ ̸̨̟͈̳͍̱̀̏̓m̵̺͎̋́u̴͇̥͍͐̇̀̇͊̌̚͝m̸̢̢͕̻̬͙̒͗̽͋͆̕͝ in less than 2GB;
  • it can be animated;
  • is more than capable of representing 1:1 any GIF image;

it sucks because the one image viewer I've ever had installed by the ubiquitous (= monopolistic) operating system everyone has by default doesn't support it.

[–] psoul@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I just converted all the images on my website to webp for faster load time. Very happy with it.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 18 hours ago

I was farting around with renpy and grabbed some free assets since I wasn't making anything important, and I noticed that each image was a full megabyte, so I converted them to webp and reduced the entire project from 20mb down to just a few megs (I don't remember specifically but I remember it was a significant reduction)

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 1 points 18 hours ago

Just use a proper Operating System and silly problems like that will go away.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

I kept a copy of the old Windows XP version of media viewer/pictute viewer, whatever the hell its generic name was becsuse at some point in, IIRC, Vista, they updated it to some piece of garbage that had an uglier UI, worked slower, had no options for slideshows, and didn't even support shit like animated .gifs.

Even that old ass program can open a .webp image.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Is this a Windows problem I'm too Linux to understand?

Seriously, everything on my computer -- Firefox, Dolphin, Gwenview, GIMP, etc. -- supports webp just fine.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I remember when you could’ve made this meme about PNGs.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 day ago (17 children)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›