this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
433 points (94.1% liked)

Science Memes

16461 readers
2758 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] x0x7@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Don't tell them that. They'll kidnap us an wire us into a human AI net all to generate pictures of boobs at lower cost.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Save power: imagine less boobs.

[–] Arfman@aussie.zone 5 points 15 hours ago
[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 65 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (6 children)

Watt is not an energy unit.

[–] MrSmith@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That's, like, your opinion, man.

[–] absentbird@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People say this, but almost every time the time interval is left off it's hours.

Either way, the numbers in this meme are clearly made up. Most image generation uses fewer than 10 watt hours.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 47 minutes ago

Maybe it's comparing the total power rating of the brain to a data center dedicated to AI

Which is also a stupid comparison because the data cenrer will be processing a lot of parallel requests. That's why you want the unit to be energy rather than power in this case

Or maybe it's all made up.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

People say this, but almost every time the time interval is left off it's hours.

This is new for me. Must be some engineering thing. I'm a physicist and and I feel guilty if I leave out some units just because, lol.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it’s about energy transfer though. transfer of titty whats to watts to my mind.

[–] HumanoidTyphoon@quokk.au 10 points 1 day ago

That’s just science

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its continuous to keep the image active in your mind :)

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That'd need watt hours though. Meme is only showing the instantaneous power required to conjure the image for an infinitesimal amount of time - you cant do any useful 'work' with it unless the time is accounted for. Watt seconds maybe.

What makes me skeptikal of this data though is that the correct sciencing term for a billion watts is the well established 'jiggawatt'. In this context I'd have also accepted the Canadian spelling 'jigglewatt'.

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

not "infinitesimal time." continuously. think of it like this: to continuously think up perky tits, it takes a human mind 12 watts- brain is a 12 watt computer. time interval is proportional to the number of titty images/length of titty video. and im psure an individual instance of titty ai doesn't come out to 2.7 jigglewatts- im like 80% sure i can get a (small) titty generator to run on my lil 50 watt phone. not testing that assumption today tho.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah no. Imagine it like a computer and screen. To render an image it will momentarily consume a bit more power, but as soon as it has been rendered it will still continuosily consume a stable amount of x Watt to keep running and displaying the picture. For continuous stable operation of something with no specified time, Watt is the correct unit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 7 points 1 day ago

Watt would you suggest?

[–] Steve@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And the text dosnt specify a time interval, whats your point?

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

That watts by themselves mean nothing with regard to energy consumption.

[–] REDACTED 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also, it literally is an energy unit used in measurements. It's meant as a continious power. Ie. Your active imagination consumes around 12 watts of power, not "rendering one image"

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] REDACTED 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Power is energy per unit of time. Energy is power over a period of time. A lightning strike is about 1 GJ of energy. But it happens in a split second, so the power is far higher, say 100 GW. That is the output of 100 nuclear power plants. But only for 0.01 seconds.

TNT is even more extreme. It can detonate in microseconds, so release its energy in a fraction of a millisecond. 1 kg contains about 4 MJ of energy, released in about 10 microseconds, a power of about 300 GW. That is about as much power as all of the USA combined needs.

[–] REDACTED 1 points 13 hours ago

Power is energy per unit of time

Thanks.

[–] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

You are off by a factor of ~250, it's 1.21 Gigawatts

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Ah damn you got me there...

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think I just burned a kilowatt of energy thanks to this meme. 🤤

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] four@lemmy.zip 4 points 23 hours ago

No, they just imagined ~800 tits. Maybe even at once.

The image in the post also uses watts where watt-hours might be more applicable, so we are already more in the realm of memes than science

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hour…

You’re being very generous. 😅

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Kilowatt is not a unit of energy.

[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago

No wait time either. I did it while reading the sentence.

[–] Mambert@beehaw.org 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Some of us have aphantasia. AI fat perky tits is an aid to the disabled.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 13 points 1 day ago

BI (biological intelligence) has luckily devised ways to get photographic replications of real fat perky tits through transformations of electromagnetic waves right to your retinas and thus into your brain. And it still takes less energy than AI.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 14 points 1 day ago

I really enjoyed those fat perky tits thanks fossilesque

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

I would have preferred a pic of the titties rather than a fibre optic brain.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The AI provides exponentially better results, if you are me

[–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Yup agreed, but mostly it's the aphantasia, you insensitive prick

[–] Lightcrater@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

Skill issue

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How much does it cost if οne person imagines it, generates an image, shares that, and 10k people see the image, and avoid imagining it?

[–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 4 points 23 hours ago

10k * 12 < 2 billion

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Must be nice, phantasics.

load more comments
view more: next ›